Interesting. I always took Claire Bloom's character to be...
Spoiler
…who’s in her bridal gown.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 05:03 PM
Interesting. I always took Claire Bloom's character to be...
Spoiler
Posted 02 January 2010 - 05:13 PM
Spoiler
Happened with Troughton
Well, there is 6B...
I’m of the mind that if it didn’t happen (or wasn’t referenced) on screen then it didn’t happen. My one exception is that I’d like to totally ignore the McGann movie. Nothing against McGann, but the McCoy Doctor had the streak of ruthlessness necessary to bring the Time War to an end. I can never imagine his girly haired replacement doing that.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 05:29 PM
And technically speaking 6B did happen on screen. Cases in point: The Two Doctors and The Five Doctors.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 05:36 PM
And technically speaking 6B did happen on screen. Cases in point: The Two Doctors and The Five Doctors.
I’ve heard this proposed before and I’m not convinced. My take is that the Doctors are plucked from a moment in their own timelines and returned there with only the current incarnation retaining memory of the adventure.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:20 PM
Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:36 PM
Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:37 PM
Yeah...
Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:57 PM
The movie also fires a photon torpedo through fanboy speculation on the identity of Claire Bloom’s character.
Spoiler
And technically speaking 6B did happen on screen. Cases in point: The Two Doctors and The Five Doctors.
I’ve heard this proposed before and I’m not convinced. My take is that the Doctors are plucked from a moment in their own timelines and returned there with only the current incarnation retaining memory of the adventure.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 09:18 PM
But the 2nd Doctor in the Two Doctors was unlike the 2nd Doctor onscreen in the 60's: he looked older, had a remote control for the TARDIS and -most importantly- was working for the Time Lords.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 09:31 PM
But the 2nd Doctor in the Two Doctors was unlike the 2nd Doctor onscreen in the 60's: he looked older, had a remote control for the TARDIS and -most importantly- was working for the Time Lords.
Simple truth is that Pat and Fraser were much older. Robert Holmes didn’t bother to explain it away. Instead he took advantage of the fact only viewers over twenty (and only a few of them) would notice that and where he fudged continuity. Otherwise you have to accept the Time Lords mind-wipe Jamie, return him to his own era, then undo it. All because his Highlander skills will be vital when the Doctor visits a space station to meet a genetic scientist.
This sort of fan speculation is fun but I’d hate to se it become canonical.
Posted 02 January 2010 - 11:29 PM
But the 2nd Doctor in the Two Doctors was unlike the 2nd Doctor onscreen in the 60's: he looked older, had a remote control for the TARDIS and -most importantly- was working for the Time Lords.
Simple truth is that Pat and Fraser were much older. Robert Holmes didn’t bother to explain it away. Instead he took advantage of the fact only viewers over twenty (and only a few of them) would notice that and where he fudged continuity. Otherwise you have to accept the Time Lords mind-wipe Jamie, return him to his own era, then undo it. All because his Highlander skills will be vital when the Doctor visits a space station to meet a genetic scientist.
Posted 03 January 2010 - 12:18 AM
Interesting discussion here and I agree with marktmurphy - Doctor 2 is nothing like himself in behaviour and characterisation and the working for the timelords thing is unprecedented within the 2 Doctor timeline of adventures we saw on screen. I give a certain amount of credence to 6B but Jamie's presence is a bit of an annoyance to that.But the 2nd Doctor in the Two Doctors was unlike the 2nd Doctor onscreen in the 60's: he looked older, had a remote control for the TARDIS and -most importantly- was working for the Time Lords.
Edited by Sniperscope, 03 January 2010 - 12:27 AM.
Posted 03 January 2010 - 12:50 AM
Interesting discussion here and I agree with marktmurphy - Doctor 2 is nothing like himself in behaviour and characterisation and the working for the timelords thing is unprecedented within the 2 Doctor timeline of adventures we saw on screen. I give a certain amount of credence to 6B but Jamie's presence is a bit of an annoyance to that.But the 2nd Doctor in the Two Doctors was unlike the 2nd Doctor onscreen in the 60's: he looked older, had a remote control for the TARDIS and -most importantly- was working for the Time Lords.
It's the same with Doctor 5 in the BIG FINISH audios and TIME CRASH - he's quite different as a character to the televised one...
Actually interesting quote here from the HORNETS' NEST CD (I guess it should be considered canonical)
MIKE YATES: it's the time lines, isn't it? you've gone and crossed over and back again and looped the flaming loop, haven't you?
DOCTOR: Have I?
Weird that! Mike seems to saying it in full knowledge of there being other Doctors since the fourth suggesting that only the current Doctor (10 at that time) should be able to visit him. Yet the fourth is here and has not crossed the time lines at all, as his cryptic reply implies. Can that mean that each incarnation continues on in alternative timestreams infinitely?
Posted 03 January 2010 - 01:29 AM
Posted 03 January 2010 - 03:21 AM
Which is another problem: unless that happens how come the 2nd Doctor in The Five Doctors remembers Jamie's mind being wiped? In The War Games he only gets told about it just before being sentenced at his trial. And how come the Doctor can steer the TARDIS to UNIT HQ? He couldn't fly it in his TV adventures. Plus the third Doctor arrives with some TARDIS homing gadgetry we never saw him with prior to Spearhead From Space.
6B tidies things up rather nicely and is a good little story in itself. I'm all for it, and Terrance Dicks himself has even written a book or two during the period. It's as close to official as you like.
Posted 03 January 2010 - 03:55 AM
Which is another problem: unless that happens how come the 2nd Doctor in The Five Doctors remembers Jamie's mind being wiped? In The War Games he only gets told about it just before being sentenced at his trial. And how come the Doctor can steer the TARDIS to UNIT HQ? He couldn't fly it in his TV adventures. Plus the third Doctor arrives with some TARDIS homing gadgetry we never saw him with prior to Spearhead From Space.
6B tidies things up rather nicely and is a good little story in itself. I'm all for it, and Terrance Dicks himself has even written a book or two during the period. It's as close to official as you like.
When Terrance Dicks wrote that scene in The Five Doctors was he laying the foundations of the 6b universe, or did he just make a mistake he hoped would go unnoticed?
Posted 03 January 2010 - 08:43 AM
I'm in complete agreement, here; I didn't get to see the Series 5 preview following the broadcast, but I fell in love with Smith's Doctor the moment he said, "Legs... I've still got legs!"Indeed, after Tennant's lip-quivering Farewell Tour, Smith's enthusiastic arrival was the perfect sobering slap in the face.... the way some people are talking about Smith stamping all over Tennant's grave by appearing at the end is more than a bit much! He's not "dead" - the Doctor has regenerated. Big difference and a crucial one.
Moffatt saying enough, you drama queen.
There's a brand-new writing staff, now, you silly goose! Davies is gone; Moffat's in charge, now, and it looks like he's bringing a new flavour to the series.I'm really not happy. Not happy at all. Doctor Who is officially dead to me. It's the writing that's done it for me. I'm so upset that I have to walk away from a show I once loved. RIP Doctor Who, may those who ruined you pay for their crimes...
From the Wikipedia page for The End of Time:Loved Smith's introduction. Brilliant send-off. So much better than I expected of Russell at this point.
Davies's script for the final episode finished with the Tenth Doctor's final line, "I don't want to go." He then sent the script to his successor Steven Moffat, who is responsible for all of the Eleventh Doctor's dialogue that follows.
Posted 03 January 2010 - 12:46 PM
Posted 03 January 2010 - 12:52 PM
I'm really not happy. Not happy at all. Doctor Who is officially dead to me. This past series was the final nail in the coffin for me, as I've come to find that ever since Tennant's second series, I've liked the show less and less until this two-parter came along and pissed all over what used to be one of, if not the best show on telly. It's the writing that's done it for me. I never had a problem with Tennant or any of the other actors in the show, but the writing has produced so many plot holes and embarrassingly poor explanations for key moments in time that just don't fit in with the pre-Eccleston era. I'm so upset that I have to walk away from a show I once loved. RIP Doctor Who, may those who ruined you pay for their crimes...
When Terrance Dicks wrote that scene in The Five Doctors was he laying the foundations of the 6b universe, or did he just make a mistake he hoped would go unnoticed?
I didn't get to see the Series 5 preview following the broadcast, but I fell in love with Smith's Doctor the moment he said, "Legs... I've still got legs!"
Posted 03 January 2010 - 07:17 PM
In terms of the new series then, is there anything you have in mind, anything you’d like to do with the music? Even just perhaps in terms of the title theme…
I’ll play it to you…
You’ve done it?
I’ve been working on it…
Note: Murray played me what is likely to be his new take on the opening theme… all will be revealed in 2010. In short, it’s marvellous…
Posted 03 January 2010 - 09:01 PM
No, I saw it on YouTube; I just wasn't able to see it right on the telly because I DVR'd End of Time, not knowing that BBC America was going to show the Series 5 preview during that dreadful-looking Demons show.Can you not see it on YouTube?I didn't get to see the Series 5 preview following the broadcast, but I fell in love with Smith's Doctor the moment he said, "Legs... I've still got legs!"
Posted 03 January 2010 - 10:35 PM
Posted 03 January 2010 - 11:23 PM
Posted 03 January 2010 - 11:30 PM
It's hard to believe that this is the same story as the novelisation, and it's increasingly clear that the Target range existed solely so that Terrance Dicks could infect the brains of a generation by conning them into thinking that all Pertwee stories were made on a budget equivalent to Ben Hur or Cleopatra. I applaud his actions in some ways, but he is entirely responsibe for that horrible feeling in my 13-year old belly when I realised that the Doctor's duel with Omega's dark side was not quite the same as the novelisation, i.e. rather than a massive arena with a scorching hot sun and a savage beast, there was a black BBC studio with an opponent that would not have been out of place on ITV with a Kent Walton commentary. Shame on you Terrance.
Posted 04 January 2010 - 10:26 AM
Well that's a shame! I had hoped (wished?!) that Gold would be gone with the change of producer - alas it was not to be... I want strange and atmospheric sounds - like Tristram Carey's THE DALEKS music or Brian Enoesque soundscapes, not more Hollywood-lite bombast! Perhaps Moffat will reign him in... but then again... he probably won't...Murray Gold confirmed in an interview he will be returning for Series 5. Full interview can be read here. Talk of Series 5 begins on the third page.
In terms of the new series then, is there anything you have in mind, anything you’d like to do with the music? Even just perhaps in terms of the title theme…
I’ll play it to you…
You’ve done it?
I’ve been working on it…
Note: Murray played me what is likely to be his new take on the opening theme… all will be revealed in 2010. In short, it’s marvellous…
But of course, I read only to see in print exactly what i see on screen! Obviously the joys of reading and imagination are a wee bit lost on this chap! Yep shame on Terrance for inspiring several generations to read and dream!And in unrelated non-news news:
It's hard to believe that this is the same story as the novelisation, and it's increasingly clear that the Target range existed solely so that Terrance Dicks could infect the brains of a generation by conning them into thinking that all Pertwee stories were made on a budget equivalent to Ben Hur or Cleopatra. I applaud his actions in some ways, but he is entirely responsibe for that horrible feeling in my 13-year old belly when I realised that the Doctor's duel with Omega's dark side was not quite the same as the novelisation, i.e. rather than a massive arena with a scorching hot sun and a savage beast, there was a black BBC studio with an opponent that would not have been out of place on ITV with a Kent Walton commentary. Shame on you Terrance.
Edited by Sniperscope, 04 January 2010 - 10:49 AM.
Posted 04 January 2010 - 10:45 AM
Edited by Sniperscope, 04 January 2010 - 10:50 AM.
Posted 04 January 2010 - 11:36 AM
Well that's a shame! I had hoped (wished?!) that Gold would be gone with the change of producer - alas it was not to be... I want strange and atmospheric sounds - like Tristram Carey's THE DALEKS music or Brian Enoesque soundscapes, not more Hollywood-lite bombast! Perhaps Moffat will reign him in... but then again... he probably won't...Murray Gold confirmed in an interview he will be returning for Series 5. Full interview can be read here. Talk of Series 5 begins on the third page.
In terms of the new series then, is there anything you have in mind, anything you’d like to do with the music? Even just perhaps in terms of the title theme…
I’ll play it to you…
You’ve done it?
I’ve been working on it…
Note: Murray played me what is likely to be his new take on the opening theme… all will be revealed in 2010. In short, it’s marvellous…
Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:07 PM
You saw twenty seconds of a new DOCTOR who - historically - is not fully settled into his new body just yet. And as the teaser proves what I have been told for months now...Smith will all over Tennent.I really think Smith ruined the atmosphere. Don't get me wrong, the series 5 trailer looks amazing, but It was like stamping all over 10's grave.
The whole scene just felt, wrong. I know it's a new guy, but I really didn't like the upbeat music or anything. I just didn't feel he had a good introduction.
9's first words: RUN
10's first words: Hello
11's first words.... Legs.
Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:13 PM
I'm really not happy. Not happy at all. Doctor Who is officially dead to me. This past series was the final nail in the coffin for me, as I've come to find that ever since Tennant's second series, I've liked the show less and less until this two-parter came along and pissed all over what used to be one of, if not the best show on telly. It's the writing that's done it for me. I never had a problem with Tennant or any of the other actors in the show, but the writing has produced so many plot holes and embarrassingly poor explanations for key moments in time that just don't fit in with the pre-Eccleston era. I'm so upset that I have to walk away from a show I once loved. RIP Doctor Who, may those who ruined you pay for their crimes...
Isn't now the time to come back, then? Now Davies has left perhaps you'll like it more?
Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:22 PM
Thousands of crew members, BBC accountants, ratings compilers, merchandise designers, actors, writers, new audiences, old audiences, global audiences, musicians, location scouts, TV schedulers and creators of subsequent series such as MERLIN, THE DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS, BEING HUMAN and SHERLOCK HOLMES would say otherwise.I think the damage is irreparable.