At least, at least we still have David Tennant, who's established himself as the finest Doctor; better even - and I never thought I'd hear myself saying this - Jon Pertwee (Tom Baker, for me, is the Sean Connery of Who: everyone thinks he's the best only because they hear everyone else saying he's the best and it's so much easier to go along with the herd).
Certainly, Pertwee is Connery.
McCann is Lazenby, for obvious reasons.
Eccleston is Dalton - not 100% confortable in the role, perhaps believing it really was beneath him.
Tennant has to be Brosnan: a more capable actor than at first sight, given some really dreadful storylines, and yet hugely successful and popular.
However, I can't help but think DW needs its Daniel Craig, and needs him now. David Morrissey could be the perfect "Who-by-Craig-as-Bond".
I must say, I believe Who already has its Daniel Craig in David Tennant. And I can't really think of any really dreadful storylines he's been given. Surely those of who watched Who since the 60s and endured the dross it became from the late 70s (Baker's third season, really) to '89, should embrace the quality of the revival. To all those who complain about the new series, I wish on them endless re-runs of The Happiness Patrol...
QFT (I'm rather fond of typing this nowadays ). After his performances alone in HUMAN NATURE/FAMILY OF BLOOD, MIDNIGHT(from this season), THE DOCTOR'S DAUGHTER etc anyone claiming that Tennant is the Pierce Brosnan of WHO is having a laugh and is biased against him because he's 'pretty'.
Like Craig is to Bond DT is, irrespective of his take's level of 'gravitas', one of the few ACTORS the role of the Doctor has acquired (Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker were great but beyond shouting convincingly, and in Tom's case his comedic timing/acting, they certainly didn't approach the role as an 'acting' part being limited dramatic perfromers themselves).
Like Craig (with the BAFTA nom and Evening Standard Award) Tennant holds the unprecedented feat of actually getting a Best Actor nom for playing the Doctor (for Series 3) from the Royal Television Society and if people believe the role was better off when it was an archetype played by comedians and entertainers who the old Whovians excuse because they fit their limited ideas of what the Doctor should be (a middle aged, not very attractive man) like Pertwee and Sylvester Mccoy for example helping foster the public perception that the character/show wasn't to be taken seriously by the minds of the public just as the casting of Moore and a non actor like Lazenby created the same for Bond they should stick to watching reruns/repeats of those serials.
As David Tennant's Doctor might say, "Oh yes!"
I quite agree, although I think Pertwee was, perhaps, a better actor than you're allowing. His sadness at Jo's departure at the conclusion of The Green Death was breathtakingly simple and understated. What he couldn't do, though, was hide his lack of interest in substandard scripts. Tom Baker's first two seasons were terrific. But then self-indulgence set in dreadfully and no-one seemed inclined to rein him in.
Who fans of my age (I've watched since the Troughton years) always assume I favour the so-called "classic" years of 1963-89 and abhor RTD's revival. Well, I don't. I'm always happy to embrace the new and acknowledge when something is better. And, while I will always regard the Pertwee years highly, I believe the new series, particularly with Tennant, is light years ahead of what went before in every department.
Edited by dee-bee-five, 15 July 2008 - 03:02 PM.