I dunno; it's sort of endearing, in a Tom Baker-ish way...Does Moffat have something against Smith or something?
Doctor Who (Series 9)
#1411
Posted 05 February 2010 - 05:44 PM
#1412
Posted 05 February 2010 - 07:18 PM
Does Moffat have something against Smith or something?
Taken out of context it does seem that way, however if you read the actual interview it goes more like:
Moffat: I wanted someone older, but then Matt Smith came in and blew us all a way and things had to change.
And the whole clumsy thing seems to be said with some affection.
#1413
Posted 05 February 2010 - 07:21 PM
It was probably just a bit of lighthearted banter. Although, Moffat does have a reputation of being a bit of a .I dunno; it's sort of endearing, in a Tom Baker-ish way...Does Moffat have something against Smith or something?
True enough. But it's worth giving the new team a chance.I watched all 6 parts of 'Genesis of the Daleks' today. Good times. That was before Doctor Who became the television abortion it is today.
#1414
Posted 07 February 2010 - 04:16 AM
Agreed. Moffat has since said Smith and Gillan are a perfect fit for the show, anyway.Taken out of context it does seem that way, however if you read the actual interview it goes more like:
Moffat: I wanted someone older, but then Matt Smith came in and blew us all a way and things had to change.
And the whole clumsy thing seems to be said with some affection.
#1415
Posted 07 February 2010 - 04:31 AM
Will he ever write an episode of "Dr. Who"? There was much applause. Someone shouted "YES!" Gaiman opened his mouth, said nothing, then smiled. And nodded.
AND!
In a special message sent to the SFX Weekender in his acceptance speech for winning Best Comic at the SFX Awards, Neil Gaiman has confirmed that he is writing an episode for the second Matt Smith season of Doctor Who.
Although not present personally, Neil Gaiman sent the following message:
"Over the years SFX, and its readers and their votes in the polls, have always been very kind to me. I thought I’d return the favour with what used to be called, in journalistic circles when I was a boy, a scoop.
As anyone who’s read my blog knows, I’m a big fan of a certain long-running British SF TV series. One that started watching -- from behind the sofa -- when I was three. And while I know it’s cruel to make you wait for things, in about 14 months from now, which is to say, NOT in the upcoming season but early in the one after that, it’s quite possible that I might have written an episode. And if I had, it would originally have been called “The House of Nothing”. But it definitely isn’t called that any more.
Countdown. You’ve got about 14 months."
#1416
Posted 10 February 2010 - 02:58 AM
Oh and, read something the other day about releasing Eleven and Amy figures later this month. See if I can't find it again.
#1417
Posted 10 February 2010 - 05:33 AM
Years have passed. Now I'm finally making another attempt to Who up my life, and this time I'm starting my intended leisurely stroll through the franchise at the beginning. The Beginning beginning, with William Hartnell as The Doctor.
I liked An Unearthly Child, an interesting introduction to things by way of an odd granddaughter who apparently went on to have shaky standing in the continuity. Watched the first serial, but I have to say that starting off a series with a story of cavemen fighting over fire is not a grand way to capture my imagination. Just finished The Daleks and enjoyed it much more. Robots with toilet plunger arms, that's more like it!
#1418
Posted 15 February 2010 - 11:27 AM
The series arc will consist of the Doctor finding bits of his TARDIS in different times and places in each story, leading him to conclude that at some point in his personal future it will be destroyed and the "debris" will be scattered along his travel path. So he has to figure out exactly what happens and how to prevent it.
This may also explain the "design a TARDIS console" contest.
If this is true, then brilliant. I suspect Moffat will do a great job!
#1419
Posted 15 February 2010 - 12:46 PM
Back when the Eccleston Whos started airing on the SciFi Channel, I attempted to get into the series. I watched and enjoyed a few episodes, but soon started missing them, fell behind and gave up. That kind of thing happened a lot back in those days, now my trusty DVR takes care of me.
Years have passed. Now I'm finally making another attempt to Who up my life, and this time I'm starting my intended leisurely stroll through the franchise at the beginning. The Beginning beginning, with William Hartnell as The Doctor.
I liked An Unearthly Child, an interesting introduction to things by way of an odd granddaughter who apparently went on to have shaky standing in the continuity. Watched the first serial, but I have to say that starting off a series with a story of cavemen fighting over fire is not a grand way to capture my imagination. Just finished The Daleks and enjoyed it much more. Robots with toilet plunger arms, that's more like it!
I actually love the first story..."throw on more of dead fire" ^^ its nice when the Doctor isn't all seeing and all knowing, the audience can involve themselves in the resolution. Equally the frequency the whole universe was in danger was much less frequent back. There is a more gentle pace to the original series (todays stories almost have to develop in real time) and that seems to provide a lot more time to appreciate the characters, to feel something is actually being revealed/investigated. Its something I would like the new series to rediscover...but I'm old fashioned that way.
#1420
Posted 15 February 2010 - 01:44 PM
A new era of Doctor Who begins in Spring 2010. This latest series of the BBC’s flagship drama programme sees Matt Smith’s debut as the new, Eleventh incarnation of the famous Time Lord alongside a new travelling companion, the enigmatic Amy Pond (Karen Gillan).
Together they explore 16th century Venice, France during the 1890s and the United Kingdom in the far future, now an entire nation floating in space.
As always, wherever the Doctor goes, his oldest enemies are never far behind – the Daleks are hatching a new master plan from the heart of war-torn London in the 1940s. But they are not the only strange creatures the Doctor and Amy must face – there are also alien vampires. humanoid reptiles, old enemies such as the Weeping Angels, a Star Whale, and a silent menace that follows Amy and the Doctor around wherever they go…
And! RFS are also claiming The Eleventh Hour will be 60 minutes long.
Also probably have said this before but I'm putting my token on April 3rd for the start of the new series. News has been kind of slow lately, but hey, at least we're getting close to spring.
#1421
Posted 17 February 2010 - 04:15 AM
#1422
Posted 17 February 2010 - 10:10 AM
Smith will nail the role, I can tell. I get the same vibe from him that I got from Craig back in 2005.
Oh, and...
The new Doctor Who trailer will premiere this Saturday on BBC One, it has been announced.
The promo for the new series, which stars Matt Smith as the Eleventh Doctor, will also simulcast on the official Who website.
Additionally, the BBC has unveiled a new promo shot for the series, which sees The Doctor and companion Amy Pond (Karen Gillan) pictured together for the first time.
The pair are pictured in a swirling vortex with some of the Doctor’s fiercest enemies including a Dalek, a Weeping Angel and a Smiler.
#1423
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:13 AM
#1424
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:16 AM
The time vortex on that image looks incredibly different that the one used in Seasons 1 -4, and the specials. You think it could be included in the new title sequence?
#1425
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:19 AM
#1426
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:47 AM
Wouldn't mind if it was though. Could make for an epic title sequence, if used properly.
#1427
Posted 17 February 2010 - 12:13 PM
I don't recall. We'll soon see.Didn't the Moff say somewhere that there'd be no vortex in the Series Fnarg titles?
#1428
Posted 18 February 2010 - 11:29 AM
The BBC has commissioned a 3D trailer to help launch the new series of Doctor Who.
The 40-second advert, which features new Doctor Matt Smith and assistant Karen Gillan, will be shown in cinemas nationwide before screenings of Alice In Wonderland.
The trailer is a converted version of the new 2D trailer that will premiere on BBC One this weekend.
A BBC spokesperson told Broadcast: "Doctor Who is the appropriate vehicle for 3D. It just fits. It’s a great way to introduce and showcase the new Doctor to younger viewers."
The new series of Who will launch in the Spring.
#1429
Posted 18 February 2010 - 12:20 PM
#1430
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:00 PM
Shame it's a UK exclusive, as it states "nationwide". But cool development nonetheless.
Eh, the regular copy'll still be all over the net in no time at all. Personally 3D and Doctor Who is just a no for me. That's even more gimmicky than a lot of other possible 3D things I've heard lately.
#1431
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:04 PM
#1432
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:45 PM
#1433
Posted 19 February 2010 - 03:27 AM
That’s exactly what I mean.I think what Sharpshooter means is that the 3D trailer is a UK exclusive. Of course, the trailer will be all over the net, but it doesn't beat the idea of sitting watching it in 3D, in front of a massive screen, atleast for him.
Very imaginative.Copy of the design here.
Found this too.
http://www.penguin.c...81405906906.jpg
#1434
Posted 19 February 2010 - 11:21 AM
#1435
Posted 19 February 2010 - 12:55 PM
#1436
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:34 PM
Basically the ground blew up and the Doctor and Amy fell through the vortex, and battled various creatures. The CGI looked terrible. Smith looked solid.
Hasn't really excited me, but I still cannot wait 'till easter.
#1437
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:46 PM
#1438
Posted 21 February 2010 - 12:27 AM
for the rest of us. Personally I enjoyed the trailer.
Also, leaked bit of a page of Vampires of Venice script.
#1439
Posted 21 February 2010 - 03:55 AM
#1440
Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:33 PM