Thomas Newman to score 'Skyfall'
#1051
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:45 AM
#1052
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:14 AM
#1053
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:28 AM
#1054
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:01 AM
That would be the most plausible explanation.
Wait, what? The Bond theme in the film is Arnolds version?
Maybe the Producers think some stuff of Newman doesn't work in the Film, and they replace some cues like the Drive to. St. Petersburg in Goldeneye?
#1055
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:49 AM
#1056
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:43 AM
Wait, what? The Bond theme in the film is Arnolds version?
Maybe the Producers think some stuff of Newman doesn't work in the Film, and they replace some cues like the Drive to. St. Petersburg in Goldeneye?
Either it did not work or they additionally buffed up the score with Arnold´s Bond theme.
Both possibilities are a bit of a let down IMO. I´d rather have Newman do his take on the Bond theme (instead of being too subtle with it). Maybe Mendes did not want Newman to use the theme too much. Maybe EON put their foot down. Maybe Sony did. We don´t know.
What we do (seem to) know is this: the film works. That´s all that matters to me in the end.
#1057
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:11 AM
So David Arnold has confirmed EON licensed "The Name's Bond . . . James Bond" from Casino Royale to use in the film.
Well that's very weird. Not sure I like the sound of just dumping in a track designed not designed for the scene.
Smacks of the producers not being fully happy with the score.
Sort of harks back to the '62 theme just turning up in OHMSS.
#1058
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:21 AM
So perhaps Eon thought Newman's effort wasn't up to scratch?
#1059
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:26 AM
So David Arnold has confirmed EON licensed "The Name's Bond . . . James Bond" from Casino Royale to use in the film.
EON. What a bunch of .
#1060
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:50 PM
Hmm this is all very interesting. The review of Skyfall in the Sabotage Times mentioned that the only thing missing from the film is a 'stand-out score...Thomas Newman’s work is fine but he’s no John Barry, or not even David Arnold'.
So perhaps Eon thought Newman's effort wasn't up to scratch?
I guess Arnold haters should be carefull of what they wish for.
#1061
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:53 PM
Maybe Stuart Baird did the same thing - and the producers and Mendes liked it?
It does not have to mean that Newman´s score was not up to snuff.
#1062
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:57 PM
It does not have to mean that Newman´s score was not up to snuff.
True, but in all the reviews i've read Deakins' cinematography gets mentioned every time, saying how excellent it is. But Newman's score isn't commented on and when it is, it isn't received so well.
But i'm sure there's nothing wrong with it, the bits i've heard from the soundtrack samples are good, some are even great.
Edited by PPK_19, 14 October 2012 - 12:58 PM.
#1063
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:03 PM
This sounds absolutely mediocre.
At best.
At worst, it souns like elevator music.
Still better than Arnold on an average day.
Nope, sorry.
Arnold's music at least is entertaining. Those samples from Skyfall are just boring and get on my nerves.
#1064
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:07 PM
Arnold's music at least is entertaining.
Eh, no.
I'll leave it at that.
#1065
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:13 PM
Yes, perhaps he used it in the temp track and they liked it so much they left it in. Still, couldn't Newman have done a new interpretation of it?Well, we know for a fact that Peter Hunt was so fond of the original Bond theme that he inserted it again and again, instead of using Barry´s original music (i.e. in "You only live twice" and "On Her Majesty´s Secret Service").
Maybe Stuart Baird did the same thing - and the producers and Mendes liked it?
It does not have to mean that Newman´s score was not up to snuff.
My take on the score, and I've only skimmed through it, is it sounds great in the slow, "setting the scene" moments, but very bland during the action.
#1066
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:29 PM
Yes, perhaps he used it in the temp track and they liked it so much they left it in. Still, couldn't Newman have done a new interpretation of it?
Well, we know for a fact that Peter Hunt was so fond of the original Bond theme that he inserted it again and again, instead of using Barry´s original music (i.e. in "You only live twice" and "On Her Majesty´s Secret Service").
Maybe Stuart Baird did the same thing - and the producers and Mendes liked it?
It does not have to mean that Newman´s score was not up to snuff.
My take on the score, and I've only skimmed through it, is it sounds great in the slow, "setting the scene" moments, but very bland during the action.
+1
like I said earlier, Newman is famous for his emotional tracks.Whats the point of having him do Bond ?
If you want emotional films there are plenty out there. Its a bad call to mix him with Bond when Bond movies are not meant to be emotional but more action oriented.
#1067
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:32 PM
It does not have to mean that Newman´s score was not up to snuff.
True, but in all the reviews i've read Deakins' cinematography gets mentioned every time, saying how excellent it is. But Newman's score isn't commented on and when it is, it isn't received so well.
But i'm sure there's nothing wrong with it, the bits i've heard from the soundtrack samples are good, some are even great.
Problem is, film scores almost never get mentioned in reviews because too many reviewers have no real interest in them.
Having said that, too many reviewers have no idea what a screenwriter does - and still criticize a script because they think that the script is the film, not taking into account the myriad factors which influence the script and its translation into the moving image.
So, cinematography - yes, that can easily be mentioned because it is what it is (and some reviewers even know what good cinematography is). Also, Deakins is a fave. He will always get great reviews.
#1068
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:42 PM
I doubt either of them would have happened if Mendes had final cut on the film, though.
#1069
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:47 PM
I doubt either of them would have happened if Mendes had final cut on the film, though.
Who's to blame then?
#1070
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:56 PM
This and the gunbarrel being at the end = disappointment.
I doubt either of them would have happened if Mendes had final cut on the film, though.
You cannot really say that, as far as we know it could be anyone.
#1071
Posted 14 October 2012 - 02:12 PM
I doubt either of them would have happened if Mendes had final cut on the film, though.
Who's to blame then?
Eon, Sony, or MGM.
#1072
Posted 14 October 2012 - 02:29 PM
I doubt either of them would have happened if Mendes had final cut on the film, though.
Who's to blame then?
Eon, Sony, or MGM.
Maybe Tony Lewis might know something?
#1073
Posted 14 October 2012 - 02:48 PM
How does reporting where in the film the gunbarrel comes in NOT a SPOILER? Please keep that stuff out of here.
I'll leave it at that.
We should be so lucky.
What amusing irony. The haters finally get a film where David Arnold is not in the picture. Yet, somehow they still feel the need to dump on him ad nauseum. Now, they find that he is still in the picture. Sweet Karma, that.
#1074
Posted 14 October 2012 - 03:08 PM
#1075
Posted 14 October 2012 - 03:18 PM
How does reporting where in the film the gunbarrel comes in NOT a SPOILER?
When there's already a thread discussing it in the non-spoiler section.
#1076
Posted 14 October 2012 - 03:38 PM
How does reporting where in the film the gunbarrel comes in NOT a SPOILER?
When there's already a thread discussing it in the non-spoiler section.
That thread was intended as just another 'wish-list' thread, started long before any film reviews (which I've avoided). Or is this the old 'well, it's screwed up elsewhere, so why not here' logic?
#1077
Posted 14 October 2012 - 03:39 PM
The haters finally get a film where David Arnold is not in the picture. Yet, somehow they still feel the need to dump on him ad nauseum.
Only because people are constantly drawing comparisons to Arnold (I'm as guilty of this as anyone). He's the man who scored the last 5 flicks, will likely be back for another (God help us), and now his arrangement of the Bond theme is being tracked into SKYFALL. While he might be something of a dead horse in these fan debates, he's as relevant as ever.
#1078
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:25 PM
#1079
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:46 PM
That cue is, frankly, kind of a definitive rendition of the James Bond Theme - in my humble opinion. It's basically just a contemporary re-recording/re-mastering/whatever of the original Dr. No recording, and I don't honestly see one thing about it that's wrong or could be cause for complaint. That they've re-used it in Skyfall, apparently, would be equivalent to the producers re-using the Dr. No recording multiple times throughout the Connery/Lazenby films. Like, can Newman record a better version of the standalone theme if he tried? Or would it be different for difference's sake?
Fine with it. Thrilled with it, actually. Can't wait to hear it.
#1080
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:54 PM
What amusing irony. The haters finally get a film where David Arnold is not in the picture. Yet, somehow they still feel the need to dump on him ad nauseum. Now, they find that he is still in the picture. Sweet Karma, that.
It really is.