Thomas Newman to score 'Skyfall'
#1081
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:55 PM
#1082
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:09 PM
That cue is, frankly, kind of a definitive rendition of the James Bond Theme - in my humble opinion. It's basically just a contemporary re-recording/re-mastering/whatever of the original Dr. No recording.
Hardly. It's basically the previous Arnold Bond themes without the breakbeats, plus Pete Lockett on the bongos. The original was just a 9 piece brass section, 5 saxes, percussion, drum set, acoustic bass and Vick Flick on guitar. Even his Shaken & Stirred take on the theme was closer to the 62 version, since the opening doesn't have the silly brass glissandos and crash cymbals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvL04bra06g
This is the closest I've found to a re-recording.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5QNstOGyM0&feature=plcp
Like, can Newman record a better version of the standalone theme if he tried? Or would it be different for difference's sake?
Hopefully the later. Nothing worse than Bond-by-numbers.
#1083
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:31 PM
EON Marketing, you can contact me via email about licensing that as a tagline for Bond 24's sure-to-be-gallingly-lacklustre poster campaign.
#1084
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:39 PM
Arnold's music at least is entertaining.
Eh, no.
I'll leave it at that.
Oh, come on.
50% of Arnold's Bond scores may be forgettable, but some of the rest is very nice, and I don't feel like dozing off.
#1085
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:43 PM
#1086
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:45 PM
#1087
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:45 PM
That cue is, frankly, kind of a definitive rendition of the James Bond Theme - in my humble opinion. It's basically just a contemporary re-recording/re-mastering/whatever of the original Dr. No recording.
Hardly. It's basically the previous Arnold Bond themes without the breakbeats, plus Pete Lockett on the bongos. The original was just a 9 piece brass section, 5 saxes, percussion, drum set, acoustic bass and Vick Flick on guitar. Even his Shaken & Stirred take on the theme was closer to the 62 version, since the opening doesn't have the silly brass glissandos and crash cymbals.
How is that silly exactly?
Also, what is wrong with giving the theme a new, slightly larger sounding, polish? The 60s version does not go away. Also, using a direct re-recording of it, with the exact same instrumentation would probably sound a bit dated if used in the context of the movie.
#1088
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:46 PM
Am I interpreting the Arnold-hate right?
Arnold's music at least is entertaining.
Eh, no.
I'll leave it at that.
Oh, come on.
50% of Arnold's Bond scores may be forgettable, but some of the rest is very nice, and I don't feel like dozing off.
#1089
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:54 PM
#1090
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:58 PM
How come we have not heard from someone who saw the film to give us an opinion as to whether it worked or not?
I think only the die hards will be able to pick out Arnold's music.
#1091
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:15 PM
Arnold's music at least is entertaining.
Eh, no.
I'll leave it at that.
Oh, come on.
50% of Arnold's Bond scores may be forgettable, but some of the rest is very nice, and I don't feel like dozing off.
I'd say there's about 15% worth listening to, the rest of it being forgettable junk. I'm not blown over by the Newman samples either, but at their best they're refreshingly current and distinct from Arnold. With the previous two films, I was watching Craig as Bond but hearing Brosnan. Finally he'll have his own sound, if only for one movie.
#1092
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:40 PM
That cue is, frankly, kind of a definitive rendition of the James Bond Theme - in my humble opinion. It's basically just a contemporary re-recording/re-mastering/whatever of the original Dr. No recording.
Hardly. It's basically the previous Arnold Bond themes without the breakbeats, plus Pete Lockett on the bongos. The original was just a 9 piece brass section, 5 saxes, percussion, drum set, acoustic bass and Vick Flick on guitar. Even his Shaken & Stirred take on the theme was closer to the 62 version, since the opening doesn't have the silly brass glissandos and crash cymbals.
How is that silly exactly?
The opening stabs should be like gunshots. Sharp and precise. Even Serra kept that feel for his gunbarrel.
Also, what is wrong with giving the theme a new, slightly larger sounding, polish?
- Craig ain't Brosnan. He has his own personality, which is far from removed from Brozza's slick cloths model.
- If you're going to remove the theme's edges and grit, why not go all the way? Why settle for some half-arsed compromise?
- Matt was talking about CR's End Credits arrangement being pretty much a rerecording - which is clearly wrong. That's what we're talking about here. I would rather a new composer do his own take on the piece, but if you're going to recreate the original, do it right.
The 60s version does not go away. Also, using a direct re-recording of it, with the exact same instrumentation would probably sound a bit dated if used in the context of the movie.
Exactly. Just as giving us a rehashed Brosnan arrangement (minus drum loops) at the tail end of a score practically drenched in electronics, comes off as anachronistic, lazy, and plain uninspired. It's 2006, not 1964 or 1997, for Christ's sake.
#1093
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:02 PM
Like I said before, there is a version of the Bond theme in Newman's score in the track "Breadcrumbs." We'll have to wait to see the film and/or buy the soundtrack to hear the whole thing.Like, can Newman record a better version of the standalone theme if he tried? Or would it be different for difference's sake?
#1094
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:11 PM
Again, for all the criticism - not one alternative suggestion of what, specifically, might be better.
#1095
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:14 PM
#1096
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:15 PM
#1097
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:17 PM
#1098
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:21 PM
Good point, thanks. Amended now.Don't forget Sony, Vauxhall.
Yes, that's actually what I was wondering, and why the question came to mind. That would seem quite odd for an acclaimed composer to use another's work out of choice, but tough to say definitively, I guess.Maybe Newman liked that version of the theme, and felt like using it in his score?
#1099
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:21 PM
Maybe Newman liked that version of the theme, and felt like using it in his score?
Entirely possible.
Quite late to this, but the use of Arnold's theme seems pretty irregular. Does anyone have an inkling of whether that was likely to be at the behest of EON, Sony, Newman or Mendes?
Why would it have to be exclusively one of their respective decisions, and not a communal one?
#1100
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:22 PM
Again, for all the criticism - not one alternative suggestion of what, specifically, might be better.
A Newman Bond theme as contemporary as George Martin's rendition in 73 was, with no traces of Arnold. Something so hot that it'd become one of the most sampled instrumentals of 2012.
#1101
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:25 PM
So I was realy pissed off when I learnt he would score CR too. However, I have to admit he did a real good job for this movie. There were some cues which were highly forgettable but I loved the way he finally used the Bond theme, not again and again like in the previous movies but with little touches of the "vamp" section. As for the final Bond theme, I didn't care really, it was a good concert version. On QoS he did a good job too, he almost managed to create some melody you can remember. That's what I call improvement. The only problem he still has: he just can't compose for action sequences. That's all.
Edited by Twingolot, 14 October 2012 - 09:27 PM.
#1102
Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:25 PM
No reason. I have absolutely no idea how these things work so was just wondering, and deferring to the expertise of others.
Quite late to this, but the use of Arnold's theme seems pretty irregular. Does anyone have an inkling of whether that was likely to be at the behest of EON, Sony, Newman or Mendes?
Why would it have to be exclusively one of their respective decisions, and not a communal one?
#1103
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:01 PM
No reason. I have absolutely no idea how these things work so was just wondering, and deferring to the expertise of others.
Quite late to this, but the use of Arnold's theme seems pretty irregular. Does anyone have an inkling of whether that was likely to be at the behest of EON, Sony, Newman or Mendes?
Why would it have to be exclusively one of their respective decisions, and not a communal one?
Ha. Same. Merely suggesting it was likely the product of some larger discussion.
#1104
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:07 PM
#1105
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:08 PM
As I said before - ask Tony Lewis.
Again, for all the criticism - not one alternative suggestion of what, specifically, might be better.
A Newman Bond theme as contemporary as George Martin's rendition in 73 was, with no traces of Arnold. Something so hot that it'd become one of the most sampled instrumentals of 2012.
That's a wonderful idea. I meant, specifically, a musical alternative. What technically would be better than what Arnold's done?
(Because, apparently, using instruments similar to the ones John Barry used to play a theme song in a fairly unchanged and iconic way is a crime against film scores).
#1106
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:15 PM
It's in the film more than once.I suspect this has come about because some bright spark decided to stick the gunbarrel onto the end of the film after the score had been recorded and they needed some music to bung on over the top of it.
#1107
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:20 PM
#1108
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:20 PM
As I said before - ask Tony Lewis.Again, for all the criticism - not one alternative suggestion of what, specifically, might be better.
A Newman Bond theme as contemporary as George Martin's rendition in 73 was, with no traces of Arnold. Something so hot that it'd become one of the most sampled instrumentals of 2012.
That's a wonderful idea. I meant, specifically, a musical alternative. What technically would be better than what Arnold's done?
I have my own idea on how I'd revamp the theme, but I don't want to share it on a public forum, in case anyone might steal it. I'll save it for Bond 29.
#1109
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:26 PM
https://twitter.com/DavidGArnold/status/257230124733317120You've mentioned that a few times, PeteNeon. What's your source on that?
Admittedly, he might be hearing things, but I doubt it.
#1110
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:53 PM
As I said before - ask Tony Lewis.Again, for all the criticism - not one alternative suggestion of what, specifically, might be better.
A Newman Bond theme as contemporary as George Martin's rendition in 73 was, with no traces of Arnold. Something so hot that it'd become one of the most sampled instrumentals of 2012.
That's a wonderful idea. I meant, specifically, a musical alternative. What technically would be better than what Arnold's done?
I have my own idea on how I'd revamp the theme, but I don't want to share it on a public forum, in case anyone might steal it. I'll save it for Bond 29.
Fair enough.