It is a lot easier to criticize than actually create something "better".
Beautifully said. Perfect words for A LOT of griping and anorak moaning round here.
No, it's a nonsense argument.
And calling people "fanboys" and "anoraks" because they happen to have a different opinion to your own isn't very nice, either.
I stand by my thoughts (as echoed by NVT) that a great many followers of the series still do not get the films - how they work, why they work and when they work. Of course we all have favourites and they should be separate from everyone else. I don't think GOLDFINGER is the Best Bond Ever. I have a favourite, but it is not the best Bond film by a long stretch (though I could defend why it might be). A lot of fans are unable to separate the film and the canon from the film in the cultural context it arrived in or the cultural zeitgeist it is reflecting.
And all of this moaning tends to come from people who could not do any better. That doesn't mean they cannot moan at all. Of course they can. But to do so from a perspective that is damning someone else's creative efforts without an understanding of the context of their work is foolish and gets the fan world of James Bond 007 nowhere.
Getting back to the song....
DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER, GOLDFINGER, A VIEW TO A KILL, FOR YOUR EYES ONLY, LIVE AND LET DIE, THUNDERBALL ... they were all songs that were as much about the cultural era they emerged in as they were Bond song standards. What happened since 1995 was that we had 007 title tracks that were trying harder to be 'Bond Songs' rather than solid pieces of contemporary music. When Madonna, Cornell, White & Keys come along and create solid Bond songs AND contemporary sounding tracks at the same time, a lot of people panic and let nostalgia damn the tracks.
Moses did not come down from that viewing theatre on the Mount and declare all Bond songs should contain brass, guitars and Shirley Bassey. The first Bond song ever heard on film was a Jamaican calypso ditty that couldn't be less 007 if it tried.