data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b44e1/b44e16ba660dda6d81549cb6cff6fa36f616ab7c" alt="Photo"
IMDb Review
#541
Posted 15 October 2008 - 10:11 AM
#542
Posted 15 October 2008 - 12:48 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":("
#543
Posted 15 October 2008 - 01:48 PM
we'll know in 2 weeks
#544
Posted 15 October 2008 - 03:46 PM
#545
Posted 15 October 2008 - 06:16 PM
I feel if bond quits at the end we may have an interesting take on the "do the mission" with out it getting personal
What if Bond utlizing his skills and being unsure of who to trust quits MI6 to figure out who is on his side and who is not you could have M figure out early on in the film and Help 007 on his goal of getting rid of the doubleagents in both MI6 and the CIA .
I just think the idea of Bond completing "his own mission" (which would be to the good of MI6) is nice twist on the Bond gets mission bond does mission without it seming personal I mean clearly if you were in bond shoes wouldn't you want to "clean house"
#546
Posted 15 October 2008 - 06:55 PM
well if it's based on what we already know of course it's "Mostly true"
we'll know in 2 weeks
I think that there was some stuff in there that was new, and not based on what we already know(some specifics about the opera sequence(Bond eyeing up a quantum man and then nicking his Tuxedo as it fitted better), the ending, No Bond,James Bond, exact details of how fields died and how she was found, with M present), so I can't decide, if YOLT was lucky, or was a feeder endorsed by EON, or whether he saw a rough cut which has since had the scenes changed(e.g Camilles fate) as he said he saw a 2 hour cut of the film. The 2 sticking points for me are Elvis's and Camille's fate. Everything else looks though it could happen from what we have seen(even since the YOLT review was published)
2 weeks time can't come quick enough.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":("
Edited by BoogieBond, 15 October 2008 - 06:57 PM.
#547
Posted 15 October 2008 - 10:32 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":("
#548
Posted 15 October 2008 - 11:10 PM
#549
Posted 15 October 2008 - 11:44 PM
i think we'll get our first rumour in early 09 with a released date of bond 23 March 09 possibly later then a flurry of rumours next summer. finaly anouncment of director cast and title with filming to begin late 09 early 2010It's kinda funky thinking that after QOS comes out we have to wait another year to know anything about #23.
I hope
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":("
#550
Posted 16 October 2008 - 12:08 AM
Also, MGW wants a three-year break to think about the next one. Sony might set a provisional date of 2010 for the next film, but the producers could pretty much do anything they wanted.
It's not. If anything, Bourne is the poor-man's Bond. Honestly, the Moscow car chase was the only decent action scene in the three films. The Paris chase in the first one was pretty generic, and the New York chase was just a re-tread of Moscow.CM007 said he saw a screening in the "Daniel Craig interview with first film clips" thread. Didn't give much information, just said the movie was very Bourne.
Edited by Captain Tightpants, 16 October 2008 - 12:11 AM.
#551
Posted 16 October 2008 - 12:35 AM
He didn't give much information did he? Funny that... you know, you'd think that as one of the first people on the planet to see the film, and certainly the first person on this forum, he would maybe start a thread with his review of the film. Maybe he could include some details that would prove he'd seen it. Because he saw Casino Royale incredibly early too. And yet on both occasions, he goes into almost no detail about the film, while criticising it as "not a Bond film". How odd.CM007 said he saw a screening in the "Daniel Craig interview with first film clips" thread. Didn't give much information, just said the movie was very Bourne.
A thought just occurred to me: perhaps he's lying through his little attention seeking fanboy teeth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25ae7/25ae7854405925daae31d5133fa4b15bbed2cc77" alt=":("
#552
Posted 16 October 2008 - 01:10 AM
Things change there was a rumour the bond producers wanted a bond film in 2007 but that wound up coming undone. I'm hoping for one in 2010 and another in 2012 and honestly both being fleming titled as well (Risico and The Hildebrand Rarity?) but we'll see certanitly Quantum looks greatForMathis, the oil thing was a rumour before the review, I'm almost certain of it. Gemma Arterton let slip that Fields came to "a sticky end" after the January press conference when the title was announced - she tends to answer anything she's asked - and speculation ws rife that she was drowned in oil, though this was largely because it was suspected that the resource Quantum were after was oil rather than water. We've since found out differently and the rumour subsided slightly, though nevertheless proved true, at least in part.
Also, MGW wants a three-year break to think about the next one. Sony might set a provisional date of 2010 for the next film, but the producers could pretty much do anything they wanted.It's not. If anything, Bourne is the poor-man's Bond. Honestly, the Moscow car chase was the only decent action scene in the three films. The Paris chase in the first one was pretty generic, and the New York chase was just a re-tread of Moscow.CM007 said he saw a screening in the "Daniel Craig interview with first film clips" thread. Didn't give much information, just said the movie was very Bourne.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":("
#553
Posted 16 October 2008 - 11:16 AM
He didn't give much information did he? Funny that... you know, you'd think that as one of the first people on the planet to see the film, and certainly the first person on this forum, he would maybe start a thread with his review of the film. Maybe he could include some details that would prove he'd seen it. Because he saw Casino Royale incredibly early too. And yet on both occasions, he goes into almost no detail about the film, while criticising it as "not a Bond film". How odd.CM007 said he saw a screening in the "Daniel Craig interview with first film clips" thread. Didn't give much information, just said the movie was very Bourne.
A thought just occurred to me: perhaps he's lying through his little attention seeking fanboy teeth
Yes.
#554
Posted 18 October 2008 - 03:09 AM
Not that I'm at all surprised. Doesn't matter if he got some of it right. YOLT flat out LIED to everyone. It is safe to say this review was indeed 100% BULL[censored]!!!!
#555
Posted 18 October 2008 - 03:24 AM
This is actually kinda funny now. Pretty much everything said about Bond, Camille, and Greene at the end is actually reversed in the final film.
Spoiler
Not that I'm at all surprised. Doesn't matter if he got some of it right. YOLT flat out LIED to everyone. It is safe to say this review was indeed 100% BULL[censored]!!!!
neither am i
so what does M and bond talk about at the end?
#556
Posted 18 October 2008 - 03:59 AM
Clearing up the Yusef business I expect, and then about the fact that Bond "never left".so what does M and bond talk about at the end?
#557
Posted 18 October 2008 - 04:26 AM
#558
Posted 18 October 2008 - 04:31 AM
#559
Posted 18 October 2008 - 06:40 AM
#560
Posted 18 October 2008 - 06:58 AM
#561
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:07 AM
so who is the head of quantum?
Q!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdacc/bdaccb563eb803893a87c21b3a6da0f59b66e8f1" alt=":("
Hence the stylised letter in the word "Quantum".
#562
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:11 AM
so who is the head of quantum?
Q!
Hence the stylised letter in the word "Quantum".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e90d5/e90d58934e26460efacfb7bf60eb755e2df0d10e" alt=":)"
#563
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:55 AM
Just brilliant!I really like the sound of Greene's demise.
Spoiler
#564
Posted 18 October 2008 - 10:24 AM
As I understand it...
Spoiler
Doesn't De Niro say those same words at the end of RONIN? I know that the context is different, but it does seem a strange.... coincidence.
#565
Posted 18 October 2008 - 12:46 PM
#566
Posted 18 October 2008 - 01:39 PM
#567
Posted 18 October 2008 - 01:40 PM
Nope, largely based on facts that we already knew, with some fabricated attempts at filling in the blanks in our knowledge.So, the imdb review was totally fake?
#568
Posted 18 October 2008 - 01:47 PM
- how does Camille exit the film?
- does Bond quit at the end? (judging from the score CD he does not)
#569
Posted 18 October 2008 - 01:52 PM
#570
Posted 18 October 2008 - 01:53 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ead90/ead905193f7005a1bdd0e550f8891b3044a85c61" alt=":)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d516/3d5160d290f411434efb1c03f9ca58b079128956" alt=":("