Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

IMDb Review


621 replies to this topic

#421 BoogieBond

BoogieBond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 834 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 07:55 PM

Wow thanks. No sign of Camille getting her revenge :(

Well, Camille doesn't want her revenge on Greene. She wants it on Medrano, and that's who she goes after (and fights with) in the finale.


Thanks. I get confused :) It makes sense that she is using Greene to get to Medrano, hence his comments in the trailer to Bond at the party. But after killing Medrano, I would have thought she would go up the ladder. Greene is doing a deal with Medrano(Valuable resource/Rainforest for further influence in the Government), I always assumed she wanted to kill Greene also to Complete her revenge of her family(Maybe her family were in the way of the deal, so in this case, she would want to kill them both). But her gaining revenge on Medrano and getting injured, then Bond leaving Greene in the desert, and Bond and Camille saying goodbye at the end with the "Your prison is in there" line makes more sense(from what we've seen in the trailer).

Also he said he saw a 2 hour version of the film that he was told was gonna be trimmed down. Dunno if they tested certain scenes to see how the audience reacted ?

Edited by BoogieBond, 02 October 2008 - 02:39 PM.


#422 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:00 PM

I also believe there was another article a couple months ago quoting Forster saying that the last scene was originally shot in the snow, but Forster changed the ending to the desert.

Well, he never said anything about it being shot - he was talking about the writing process, and how Haggis scripted the grand action finale in snow, and Forster wanted it in desert because of how the desert exemplified where Bond was at emotionally.

All of that has nothing to do with the end coda in Moscow.

#423 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:07 PM

What's the verdict then, fellas? Is this review on the square or isn't it?

#424 MattofSteel

MattofSteel

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2482 posts
  • Location:Waterloo, ON

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:13 PM

I also believe there was another article a couple months ago quoting Forster saying that the last scene was originally shot in the snow, but Forster changed the ending to the desert.

Well, he never said anything about it being shot - he was talking about the writing process, and how Haggis scripted the grand action finale in snow, and Forster wanted it in desert because of how the desert exemplified where Bond was at emotionally.

All of that has nothing to do with the end coda in Moscow.


I don't recall reading anything about the grand action finale in the snow. Have a link?

#425 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:13 PM

What's the verdict then, fellas? Is this review on the square or isn't it?

You won't get any consensus. My verdict: bogus. Well-informed from different sources, but bogus. And I'll stand by that until more information rolls in.

#426 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:17 PM

What's the verdict then, fellas? Is this review on the square or isn't it?

You won't get any consensus. My verdict: bogus. Well-informed from different sources, but bogus. And I'll stand by that until more information rolls in.

And if you're wrong...? :(

#427 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:21 PM

What's the verdict then, fellas? Is this review on the square or isn't it?

You won't get any consensus. My verdict: bogus. Well-informed from different sources, but bogus. And I'll stand by that until more information rolls in.

And if you're wrong...? :(

Then I'm wrong and that's that. Hardly a great sin. But as the information currently stands, it appears that this review is nothing more than a somewhat convincing fake, well-informed by spoilers and reports, but make some rather substanial errors in other sections.

#428 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:24 PM

What's the verdict then, fellas? Is this review on the square or isn't it?

You won't get any consensus. My verdict: bogus. Well-informed from different sources, but bogus. And I'll stand by that until more information rolls in.


Fair enough.

#429 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 01 October 2008 - 08:59 PM

Is there at the very least a cosensus on the end does Bond Quit at the end of Quantum of solace?

#430 Elvenstar

Elvenstar

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 294 posts
  • Location:nowhere

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:14 AM

I have slightly more hope that it's true after reading this in Cineplex article

A few weeks after filming wraps, Marc Forster screens a rough assemblage of various scenes at a nondescript Soho screening room one rainy evening. I had to sign a confidentiality agreement not to reveal any spoilers, but can say that Quantum of Solace invokes a glorious retro Bond style as the film traverses exotic locales, including Panama, Peru, Chile, Italy, Austria and, of course, MI6 home base in London. The action is intense, and the drama textured and nuanced. And there are a couple of winks to past Bond hallmarks sure to thrill the real fans. “I’m really glad I did the movie I wanted to do,” says Forster once the lights have come up. “So if it fails, it’s my responsibility".

So this screening happened for real I suppose.

Edited by Elvenstar, 02 October 2008 - 07:16 AM.


#431 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:21 AM

I have slightly more hope that it's true after reading this in Cineplex article

A few weeks after filming wraps, Marc Forster screens a rough assemblage of various scenes at a nondescript Soho screening room one rainy evening. I had to sign a confidentiality agreement not to reveal any spoilers, but can say that Quantum of Solace invokes a glorious retro Bond style as the film traverses exotic locales, including Panama, Peru, Chile, Italy, Austria and, of course, MI6 home base in London. The action is intense, and the drama textured and nuanced. And there are a couple of winks to past Bond hallmarks sure to thrill the real fans. “I’m really glad I did the movie I wanted to do,” says Forster once the lights have come up. “So if it fails, it’s my responsibility".

So this screening happened for real I suppose.

Yeah, but this was an actual review, not someone on IMdB wanting their fifteen seconds of fame, or The Sun making crap up so they can say they were the first.

#432 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 02 October 2008 - 02:09 PM

hmmmm


the imdb guy could be legit................... maybe


possibly


Less than a month till we know for sure.

#433 QuantumM66

QuantumM66

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 60 posts
  • Location:resides at an MI6 safe-house in Helsinki, Finland

Posted 02 October 2008 - 05:16 PM

At least the IMDb guy is right about one thing...

In the official press Production Notes of QOS
it IS revealed (spoiled) that 007 does indeed
leave Greene in the desert at the end.

Obviously, the notes don't reveal if Greene will
be rescued from there.

Personally, I doubt he will. I mean, is Greene
charismatic enough a villain that we want to see
him in two or more movies?

Really. I beg to differ. No doubt whatsoever that
the diminutive French guy is a great actor and
director, but that still doesn't make him
friggin' Ernst Stavro Blofeld.

What an irony, isn't it, that the villain who aspires
to control water is dumped by Bond to the desert?

I'd love to see, however, an ambiguous ending in the
vein of OHMSS, for sure. The jury's out.

Not much time left now, thank God!

Edited by QuantumM66, 02 October 2008 - 05:16 PM.


#434 ForMathis

ForMathis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 214 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:42 PM

I am to understand that this review was written before the release of the first trailer?

Spoiler


So he was the first to even suggest most of these things (no stirred/shaken line, return of classic gun-barrel, Greene being left to die is dessert, no Bond, James Bond line, Mathis dieing...)

If so than there is no doubt that he did in fact see a screening of QoS and this is a real review.

-

Hopefully that doesn't mean that the Sun review is real also. I don't like the fact that they compared it to Rambo.

#435 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:51 PM

Yet more evidence that this is Legit....

yolt mentioned a scene at the Opera where Bond is fighting on the roof with a guard, Bond throws the guard off the roof and onto a car, where another henchman gets out and shoots the guard.

Now... on Page 323 of the latest issue of GQ, there is an interview with a stuntman (Derek Lea) who worked on Quantum.

He says.... "In Quantum of Solace I get thrown off a roof by Daniel Craig, I fall 40 feet and land on the bad guy's car, only for his henchman to shoot me"

:(

#436 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:14 PM

so with ending somewhat confirmed Bond leaving at the end I wonder if this impact what people feel is a suitable fleming title for Bond 23.

#437 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:24 PM

I really do think that 'The Hildebrand Rarity' would be the safest way to go. I dunno, but for some reason this sounds like a great follow up from 'Quantum of Solace'.

#438 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:26 PM

Yet more evidence that this is Legit....

yolt mentioned a scene at the Opera where Bond is fighting on the roof with a guard, Bond throws the guard off the roof and onto a car, where another henchman gets out and shoots the guard.

Now... on Page 323 of the latest issue of GQ, there is an interview with a stuntman (Derek Lea) who worked on Quantum.

He says.... "In Quantum of Solace I get thrown off a roof by Daniel Craig, I fall 40 feet and land on the bad guy's car, only for his henchman to shoot me"

:)

:(

Ye gads... :)

#439 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:43 PM

I really do think that 'The Hildebrand Rarity' would be the safest way to go. I dunno, but for some reason this sounds like a great follow up from 'Quantum of Solace'.

I'd love it honestly. The Hildebrand Rarity is my current Favourite unused fleming title (before that it was Quantum of Solace)


I'd love it. But that is just me.

#440 ForMathis

ForMathis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 214 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 02 October 2008 - 08:51 PM

My only concern is that yolt said it was perfectly paced at around 2hrs. He even went as far to say that it was one of the best Bond movies of them all along with CR, and FYEO (my personal favorite)

Since the official running time has been reported to be 106 minutes.. they have presumably cut anywhere from 10-15 minutes from the version that yolt saw/reviewed.

Hopefully this hasn't damaged the film...

Edited by ForMathis, 02 October 2008 - 08:52 PM.


#441 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 02 October 2008 - 10:55 PM

So he was the first to even suggest most of these things (no stirred/shaken line, return of classic gun-barrel, Greene being left to die is dessert, no Bond, James Bond line, Mathis dieing...)

Well, actually the gunbarrel's return was suggested before the IMDB review, as was Greene being left in the desert, and Mathis' death. So yeah.

The big things that stand in the way of the review are this:

1. YOLT got Elvis' death wrong.

2. From all appearances, Camille does not bite the dust in QUANTUM OF SOLACE.

#442 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 03 October 2008 - 12:50 AM

So he was the first to even suggest most of these things (no stirred/shaken line, return of classic gun-barrel, Greene being left to die is dessert, no Bond, James Bond line, Mathis dieing...)

Well, actually the gunbarrel's return was suggested before the IMDB review, as was Greene being left in the desert, and Mathis' death. So yeah.

The big things that stand in the way of the review are this:

1. YOLT got Elvis' death wrong.

2. From all appearances, Camille does not bite the dust in QUANTUM OF SOLACE.


but he got the "no bond james bond" right


Does bond quit the service at the end harmsway any idea?

#443 Elvenstar

Elvenstar

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 294 posts
  • Location:nowhere

Posted 03 October 2008 - 08:11 AM

it was one of the best Bond movies of them all along with CR, and FYEO (my personal favorite)

I happened to watch FYEO yesterday for the first time. And one thing struck me as similar to Qos (along with main Bong girl wanting revenge on the killers of her family and another rather young Bond girl). A moment when the girl drove this tiny yellow car and Bond reluctantly joins her in it reminded me of a shot of Bond and Camille in Ford Ka "Get in" "Alright". :(

Edited by Elvenstar, 03 October 2008 - 08:15 AM.


#444 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 03 October 2008 - 09:39 PM

I think this is true?

Maybe?

#445 timmyv123

timmyv123

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 22 posts

Posted 03 October 2008 - 11:09 PM

That is extremely detailed not to be true however I don't deem it to be 100% accurate, I believe bits here and there may be true but the ending especially doesn't make sense to me? Bond leaving the service? Ohmss, licence to kill? Been there, done that, A bad guy surviving? Apart from you only live twice I don't recall the main villain ever surviving! except maybe jaws in tswlm but he was a henchman

#446 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 03 October 2008 - 11:45 PM

The big things that stand in the way of the review are this:

1. YOLT got Elvis' death wrong.

2. From all appearances, Camille does not bite the dust in QUANTUM OF SOLACE.

We don't know for certain if either of those are actually wrong yet, though, do we?

#447 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 04 October 2008 - 01:01 AM

The big things that stand in the way of the review are this:

1. YOLT got Elvis' death wrong.

2. From all appearances, Camille does not bite the dust in QUANTUM OF SOLACE.

We don't know for certain if either of those are actually wrong yet, though, do we?

Exactly; we have all the time in the world to figure out that... :(

#448 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 04 October 2008 - 04:10 AM

The big things that stand in the way of the review are this:

1. YOLT got Elvis' death wrong.

2. From all appearances, Camille does not bite the dust in QUANTUM OF SOLACE.

We don't know for certain if either of those are actually wrong yet, though, do we?

We know that #1 is wrong pretty much for certain. Elvis is clearly visible in footage during the climax in the eco-hotel (complete with neck brace), which means he is alive after the plane incident.

#2, we don't know for sure, but hence "from all appearances." And there's some pretty good evidence, so YOLT has some serious 'splainin to do. The biggest thing to explain away is the train yard bit.

#449 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 04 October 2008 - 01:10 PM

That is extremely detailed not to be true however I don't deem it to be 100% accurate, I believe bits here and there may be true but the ending especially doesn't make sense to me? Bond leaving the service? Ohmss, licence to kill? Been there, done that,

Ah yes, but due to the reboot aspect, those incidents don't exist in this Bond's universe. Plus, Bond leaving the service has arguably never been done well.

A bad guy surviving? Apart from you only live twice I don't recall the main villain ever surviving! except maybe jaws in tswlm but he was a henchman

Exactly the reason I like the idea of the main villain surviving. It shakes up the formula. CASINO ROYALE had the main Bond girl dying!

#450 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 04 October 2008 - 01:30 PM

We know that #1 is wrong pretty much for certain. Elvis is clearly visible in footage during the climax in the eco-hotel (complete with neck brace), which means he is alive after the plane incident.

Yes, but it's possible he could die in a plane crash while trying to escape during the finale.