






A Daniel Craig double on the set:

Posted 19 April 2008 - 07:41 PM
Posted 19 April 2008 - 07:47 PM
Posted 19 April 2008 - 08:15 PM
Posted 19 April 2008 - 08:16 PM
I think that's Adam Kirley. The chap who did the car flip in Casino Royale.A Daniel Craig double on the set:
Posted 19 April 2008 - 08:25 PM
Posted 19 April 2008 - 08:29 PM
Judging by that first pic, it looks as if the Aston is set forSpoiler
Posted 19 April 2008 - 09:18 PM
Na...MkB is on it. Two in a row would not bode well for DC's James Bond becoming the 007 we all know and love.
Judging by that first pic, it looks as if the Aston is set forSpoiler
Posted 19 April 2008 - 09:25 PM
I think that's Adam Kirley. The chap who did the car flip in Casino Royale.
Na...MkB is on it. Two in a row would not bode well for DC's James Bond becoming the 007 we all know and love.
Posted 20 April 2008 - 02:28 AM
Bond car veered off the road while being driven to 'Quantum' set
Posted 20 April 2008 - 02:39 AM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 02:51 AM
OMG... Is that the suit from the end of Casino Royale?
Atleast he's wearing the same clothes.
Posted 20 April 2008 - 02:52 AM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 01:17 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 01:56 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 04:23 PM
OMG... Is that the suit from the end of Casino Royale?
Atleast he's wearing the same clothes.
Posted 20 April 2008 - 04:25 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 06:05 PM
That's a stunt car with the body removed. Interesting that's it's right-hand drive, though.But this third one intrigues me more: it looks like a half-car??
Posted 20 April 2008 - 06:51 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 10:21 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 10:44 PM
OMG... Is that the suit from the end of Casino Royale?
Atleast he's wearing the same clothes.
It doesn't seem like he's wearing the waistcoat though...odd. It's the same in other photos they released from later on in the PTS. Same pinstripe only he's also lost the tie in those, and definitely no waistcoat.
Posted 20 April 2008 - 10:59 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 11:04 PM
Whats this that they're reporting about now that it was the only car the production had to use in the film? I thought they had a few of them. If its true though, that could cause some problems and delays.
Posted 20 April 2008 - 11:18 PM
Posted 20 April 2008 - 11:42 PM
Yeah, it's tabloid trash. They had five cars; now they're down to four. This accident is precisely the reason why they take multiple cars to the set: because if someting happens to one - like, say, a technician is involved in an accident and drives it into a lake - then they have back-up vehicles on hand. While they mainly use those vehicles for other parts of the sequence, one could easily stand in for another in the event something drastic happens.Whats this that they're reporting about now that it was the only car the production had to use in the film? I thought they had a few of them. If its true though, that could cause some problems and delays.
Yes, I heard this on a YouTube clip from some US TV. As it's clearly not the only Aston Martin on set, I see two possible reasons:
- this is simply bull
- this car was specially prepped to carry some special gizmo, either to be featured in the film, or to film (like the contraption we saw on other pics)
Posted 21 April 2008 - 12:17 AM
Posted 21 April 2008 - 01:13 AM
Before the accident:
After:
The poor dear thing looks like... a fish out of the water
A new video of the car being prepped with a contraption on it:
Posted 21 April 2008 - 03:28 AM
Posted 21 April 2008 - 03:54 AM
Probably not that much, really. Contrary to what the tabloids say, the film crew still have four Aston Martins at hand, which could easily be used for the sequence the destroyed car was en route to (supposedly the final shots). I daresay once they knew the technician who crashed the car was alright, they went back to filming with one of the other cars. If not, they'd probably just re-schedule the scene they were going to shoot until such time as another car could be brought in.Does anyone know how long this accident will set filming back?
Posted 21 April 2008 - 05:22 AM
Posted 21 April 2008 - 05:27 AM