Now, then BM3...How can any other villian come within a hundred miles? I believe so--but not with Two Face, whose makeup will undo him. The error there, imo, was taking the original character too literally.
Are you suggesting they not disfigure Two-Face at all?! I could understand the request to tone the look down, but to get rid of it altogether is a rather drastic re-write of a solid, beloved character, and only the kind that someone loosely acquainted with the character would ask for (the fanbase would riot in the streets, and rightly so). If you're going to take that step, you might as well not use the character at all and just right someone new.
The facial deformity is what carries the character from just another baddie to a mythic foe. And the myth is essential to the superhero genre and Batman, even when you're doing a more real-world spin. Even for all it's "realistic" coating (which isn't realistic at all, when you get down to it), THE DARK KNIGHT is mythology. It's the equivalent of saying the Joker should have just looked like a normal dude, or that Batman shouldn't really wear armor designed to echo a bat.
And personally, I thought the effects were damn good. This feeling was only confirmed when I saw Two-Face on the IMAX screen and was able to really appreciate the quality and detail of the effects work. I daresay, his face is more convincing larger than it is smaller!
What would I like to see? The Penguin done not as a comic book human penguin but as a creepy, scary dude with one or two penguin-like characteristics.
Well, Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan,
and David Goyer have all ruled the Penguin out. I wouldn't count on him. Besides, there's nothing really interesting about the character, anyway.