Hugo Strange would seem the best of those options in my opinion. None of them seem great suggestions though.http://splashpage.mt...iters-weigh-in/
Yeah, I know. Some of the answers are just nut!Mad Hatter? Calender Man?....I'm so glad this is Nolan's world. This will never happen.

SPOILERS: The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
#181
Posted 07 August 2008 - 11:54 AM
#182
Posted 07 August 2008 - 11:57 AM
Hugo Strange would seem the best of those options in my opinion. None of them seem great suggestions though.http://splashpage.mt...iters-weigh-in/
Yeah, I know. Some of the answers are just nut!Mad Hatter? Calender Man?....I'm so glad this is Nolan's world. This will never happen.
Indeed, from this list Strange could be a nice fit.

#183
Posted 07 August 2008 - 02:05 PM
I don't know... there's something to be said for some of the lesser known nutjobs showing up to demonstrate that Gotham's gone downhill and that there are a lot of less successful would-be costumed foes. The Mad Hatter is perfect for that, especially if you take the kidnapper/pedophile route that has been done in the comics from recent times.http://splashpage.mt...iters-weigh-in/
Yeah, I know. Some of the answers are just nut!Mad Hatter? Calender Man?....I'm so glad this is Nolan's world. This will never happen.
Calendar Man, though, I can't see working in a film. He's used to brilliant effect in a Hannibal Lecter role in THE LONG HALLOWEEN, but I just don't see it for a film.
#184
Posted 07 August 2008 - 03:31 PM
I don't know... there's something to be said for some of the lesser known nutjobs showing up to demonstrate that Gotham's gone downhill and that there are a lot of less successful would-be costumed foes. The Mad Hatter is perfect for that, especially if you take the kidnapper/pedophile route that has been done in the comics from recent times.http://splashpage.mt...iters-weigh-in/
Yeah, I know. Some of the answers are just nut!Mad Hatter? Calender Man?....I'm so glad this is Nolan's world. This will never happen.
Calendar Man, though, I can't see working in a film. He's used to brilliant effect in a Hannibal Lecter role in THE LONG HALLOWEEN, but I just don't see it for a film.
I’d go with Black Mask, Scarface and the Ventriloquist, and Harley Quinn (who essentially could be a stand-in for the Joker while he’s in Arkham).
#185
Posted 07 August 2008 - 03:50 PM
#186
Posted 07 August 2008 - 04:51 PM
#187
Posted 07 August 2008 - 05:08 PM

#188
Posted 08 August 2008 - 12:39 AM
#190
Posted 08 August 2008 - 05:03 AM
Eh, I'm not that impressed by the ideas that article presents.And this could be great!
http://www.newsarama...ht-returns.html
#191
Posted 08 August 2008 - 05:17 AM
1. Superman and Wonder Woman could not exist.
2. Batman's "retirement" would have to be much shorter.
3. They'd have to get an actor who could REALLY live up to Ledger's Joker.
4.
#192
Posted 08 August 2008 - 05:20 AM
Well, Two-Face's role in DKR isn't exactly central. It could very easily be streamlined out."TDKR" would work with a few exceptions:
1. Superman and Wonder Woman could not exist.
2. Batman's "retirement" would have to be much shorter.
3. They'd have to get an actor who could REALLY live up to Ledger's Joker.
4.Spoiler
Personally, I'd just rather see Nolan develop his own third installment, rather than doing a watered-down DKR. There's much more to be done, narratively speaking, in the progression of Batman as a figure and the state of Gotham City before we ever get to the "final days of Batman."
But it's really just a pipe dream. No such DKR film will ever happen, at least not until Nolan's finished.
#193
Posted 08 August 2008 - 06:43 AM
#194
Posted 18 August 2008 - 07:17 AM
#195
Posted 18 August 2008 - 08:08 AM
He'd be my number one pick.Regarding potential Riddler casting, what about Michael Emerson? Would that be too much of a Lost fanwank? He's certainly cerebral and sinister enough, with just a touch of mania that leads his Linus character to do some pretty extreme things.
#196
Posted 18 August 2008 - 01:33 PM
#197
Posted 18 August 2008 - 02:07 PM
I'd be more interested to see what Terry O'Quinn could do, although I think he'd be an even better Lex Luthor for the in-desperate-need-of-a-TDK-equivalent Superman franchise. And I don't say that just because he's bald.Regarding potential Riddler casting, what about Michael Emerson? Would that be too much of a Lost fanwank? He's certainly cerebral and sinister enough, with just a touch of mania that leads his Linus character to do some pretty extreme things.

Anyway, check out this fan-made teaser poster for Batman 3: http://sophosmoros.f...-fan-poster.jpg
#198
Posted 18 August 2008 - 02:09 PM
He'd be my number one pick.Regarding potential Riddler casting, what about Michael Emerson? Would that be too much of a Lost fanwank? He's certainly cerebral and sinister enough, with just a touch of mania that leads his Linus character to do some pretty extreme things.
I think Emerson would rock, as well. But a far more interesting choice could be William Fichtner--an actor you've probably seen dozens of times but whose name you might not recognize. He's currently part of the Prison Break ensemble. He had a small part in TDK as the doomed shotgun-firing bank employee. Etc. Very subtle actor, capable of playing anything from psychos to sympathetic leads.
#199
Posted 18 August 2008 - 05:15 PM
I'd be more interested to see what Terry O'Quinn could do
The Stepfather? Always a delight to see him in villainous roles. Or Jeffrey Combs...
#200
Posted 18 August 2008 - 05:53 PM
Are you kidding? Emerson is one of the most nuanced actors out there and deserves much more praise than he gets. I should be disappointed that the Lost castaways have shifted out of the spotlight because of his character, but Emerson is such a revelation as Ben Linus that his centric episodes are easily among my favourites. As a Batman villain, though, I don't know. Outside of the baddies done in the Burton/Schumacher films, I'm not up on the Batman villains.Emerson, frankly, isn't that good of an actor.
Fichtner is phenomenal. He has such a unique look - you don't know what's happening behind his eyes. Like Emerson, you know an actor is great when they enter a TV series mid-run as a main player and succeed beyond expectations. Maybe it's a stretch, but is there any potential for his Dark Knight character to evolve into a villain? He didn't explicitly die, did he?I think Emerson would rock, as well. But a far more interesting choice could be William Fichtner--an actor you've probably seen dozens of times but whose name you might not recognize. He's currently part of the Prison Break ensemble. He had a small part in TDK as the doomed shotgun-firing bank employee. Etc. Very subtle actor, capable of playing anything from psychos to sympathetic leads.
#201
Posted 18 August 2008 - 05:58 PM
Are you kidding? Emerson is one of the most nuanced actors out there and deserves much more praise than he gets. I should be disappointed that the Lost castaways have shifted out of the spotlight because of his character, but Emerson is such a revelation as Ben Linus that his centric episodes are easily among my favourites. As a Batman villain, though, I don't know. Outside of the baddies done in the Burton/Schumacher films, I'm not up on the Batman villains.Emerson, frankly, isn't that good of an actor.
I'm a fan of Lost but I wouldnt give Emerson that sort of praise. He's good (and frankly, he's a lot better than much of the cast of Lost) but I couldnt imagine him delivering anything near as good as Heath Ledger's performance.
#202
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:07 PM
Tragically, I think few actors out there could. Ledger's performance will hang over not just any future interpretation of The Joker, but any future Batman villain period. It will also hang over not just any future Batman film, but more pertinently, the next one.
Are you kidding? Emerson is one of the most nuanced actors out there and deserves much more praise than he gets. I should be disappointed that the Lost castaways have shifted out of the spotlight because of his character, but Emerson is such a revelation as Ben Linus that his centric episodes are easily among my favourites. As a Batman villain, though, I don't know. Outside of the baddies done in the Burton/Schumacher films, I'm not up on the Batman villains.Emerson, frankly, isn't that good of an actor.
I'm a fan of Lost but I wouldnt give Emerson that sort of praise. He's good (and frankly, he's a lot better than much of the cast of Lost) but I couldnt imagine him delivering anything near as good as Heath Ledger's performance.
Still, I see Emerson as one of the few actors out there who has such presence when on-screen that you become unaware of everything else that's happening.
#203
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:10 PM
#204
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:19 PM
He could, but two points:I could see Robert Downey Jr. pulling it off....
- Would Downey want to be linked to two major comic book franchises? And more pertinently, two major comic book franchises from the two competing comic book stablehouses?
- With Iron Man catapulting him back on the A-list, he's too much of a name. Nolan has a great knack for hiring maybe not lesser-known actors, but perhaps less obvious choices. When Ledger was first announced as The Joker, I was completely unconvinced. And Eckhart seemed an interesting but dull choice as Dent. Both blew me away. In my opinion, Nolan's only misfire was Cillian Murphy, who looks way too young for such a role.
#205
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:38 PM
I respectfully, and strongly, disagree.Are you kidding? Emerson is one of the most nuanced actors out there and deserves much more praise than he gets.Emerson, frankly, isn't that good of an actor.
My choice is Casey Affleck.
#206
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:46 PM
After seeing ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES..., I think he’d make a marvelous Riddler that I dare say might even be able to stand in the ring with Ledger’s Joker performance.I respectfully, and strongly, disagree.
Are you kidding? Emerson is one of the most nuanced actors out there and deserves much more praise than he gets.Emerson, frankly, isn't that good of an actor.
My two choices are Neil Patrick Harris or Casey Affleck.
What a twitchy little worm that guy can play! Disturbed, creepy, unstable, suggestive of serious childhood trauma, and I'll bet capable of achieving total malevolent giddiness. Which is what the Riddler's about as far as I know. (I only know the Riddler for what he’s intended to be in the TV show, cartoons and Carey’s go at it. I don’t know the comic version, but I assume those others were at least roughly based on the comic character. I would suppose that all that’s been missing is the serious approach. Given that, Affleck has got what it takes.)
#207
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:48 PM
Yeah, I'm only familiar with the Riddler from the TV series and Batman Forever; can someone share what the Riddler of the comics is like - and how he might fit in with Nolan's Batman universe?I only know the Riddler for what he’s intended to be in the TV show, cartoons and Carey’s go at it. I don’t know the comic version, but I assume those others were at least roughly based on the comic character.
#208
Posted 18 August 2008 - 06:58 PM
#209
Posted 18 August 2008 - 07:18 PM
Where are these guys when you need them?!

#210
Posted 18 August 2008 - 08:54 PM
Yeah, I'm only familiar with the Riddler from the TV series and Batman Forever; can someone share what the Riddler of the comics is like - and how he might fit in with Nolan's Batman universe?I only know the Riddler for what he’s intended to be in the TV show, cartoons and Carey’s go at it. I don’t know the comic version, but I assume those others were at least roughly based on the comic character.
The Riddler was a minor villain in the comics who was simply a half-rate Joker until Gorshin’s portrayal on the old TV show. After that the comic character became shaped by Gorshin. So if you know the television version, you know the Riddler.