Indiana Jones Thread
#61
Posted 13 April 2007 - 08:19 PM
#62
Posted 13 April 2007 - 09:03 PM
Nice. She was a liability. Any reason why they changed?
Rumor has it that Katie Holmes chose not to return.
#63
Posted 13 April 2007 - 09:09 PM
#64
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:26 AM
http://www.chud.com/...e=news&id=10334
[spoiler]A source close to the production of Indiana Jones IV (still, as far as we know, unofficially called Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods, but more on that later) has divulged some information to us about the film
#65
Posted 21 May 2007 - 01:58 PM
I think it's going to be interesting seeing Indy in the 1950s- and while I hope he still doesn't have a son, I'll be okay with the development if it is handled well on screen.
#66
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:43 PM
Uh... well, the physical relic is all fine. It's the fact that INDY IV seems to have everything to do with aliens. Frankly, that idea sucks. Religious relics, please.I think its hard to judge the relic based upon a brief summary. After all, the Sankara stones don't seem all that wonderful, but Temple of Doom was still classic.
#67
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:50 PM
Uh... well, the physical relic is all fine. It's the fact that INDY IV seems to have everything to do with aliens. Frankly, that idea sucks. Religious relics, please.I think its hard to judge the relic based upon a brief summary. After all, the Sankara stones don't seem all that wonderful, but Temple of Doom was still classic.
Aliens? Oops... didn't see that. Um, well- I dunno. It is a rumor, right?
And I take it you were not fond of Temple of Doom?
#68
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:10 PM
Kind of. That guy writing the article did read the Frank Darabont script (from 2005), and it seems like Lucas has been harping on this same relic for longer... just different drafts. As to what his scooper is reporting, that's rumor, but it's not hearsay... I'd say it's above typical rumor status. When CHUD trusts a source, they're usually on the ball.Aliens? Oops... didn't see that. Um, well- I dunno. It is a rumor, right?
Nah, I really love TEMPLE OF DOOM.And I take it you were not fond of Temple of Doom?
#69
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:16 PM
Uh... well, the physical relic is all fine. It's the fact that INDY IV seems to have everything to do with aliens. Frankly, that idea sucks. Religious relics, please.
Aliens hardly seem ridiculous after Grail knights, magic stones from India, and melting Nazis exposed to the Ark of the Covenant. Plus, you can't say Spielberg doesn't do aliens well. I'm all for this idea - ditch the religious relics (the series has done 'em to death anyway) and bring on the sci-fi, mixing it up with AMERICAN GRAFFITI-style greasers. This sounds like the best of Lucas and Spielberg wrapped up in a single movie.
Suddenly, INDY 4 is interesting to me. If only they'll refrain from bringing Connery back (I like Connery, but hate how LAST CRUSADE made his character basically just a buffoon, and I don't want the same thing again only 20 years older), this ought to be a home run.
#70
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:26 PM
It's not that they're any less plausible, it's just that they're less compelling. I want the mythology, the mysticism. That's what made the other relics cool... the fact that they tied into other faiths and had that spiritual significance. And these artifacts won't even have the supernatural, unexplainable element at all, now - they're just going to be advanced alien technology. Meh. Furthermore, the last thing I want to see in an Indiana Jones film is a flying saucer or any such nonsense. And an opening scene atAliens hardly seem ridiculous after Grail knights, magic stones from India, and melting Nazis exposed to the Ark of the Covenant. Plus, you can't say Spielberg doesn't do aliens well. I'm all for this idea - ditch the religious relics (the series has done 'em to death anyway) and bring on the sci-fi, mixing it up with AMERICAN GRAFFITI-style greasers. This sounds like the best of Lucas and Spielberg wrapped up in a single movie.Uh... well, the physical relic is all fine. It's the fact that INDY IV seems to have everything to do with aliens. Frankly, that idea sucks. Religious relics, please.
Connery still hasn't signed, though he has the script and has supposedly been in negotiations. The fact that it is taking so long says to me that the chances of him not returning are pretty good.Suddenly, INDY 4 is interesting to me. If only they'll refrain from bringing Connery back (I like Connery, but hate how LAST CRUSADE made his character basically just a buffoon, and I don't want the same thing again only 20 years older), this ought to be a home run.
#71
Posted 21 May 2007 - 06:03 PM
I'm with you on the aliens. I much prefer the mysticism and mythology, like you.It's not that they're any less plausible, it's just that they're less compelling. I want the mythology, the mysticism. That's what made the other relics cool... the fact that they tied into other faiths and had that spiritual significance. And these artifacts won't even have the supernatural, unexplainable element at all, now - they're just going to be advanced alien technology. Meh. Furthermore, the last thing I want to see in an Indiana Jones film is a flying saucer or any such nonsense. And an opening scene at
Spoilerstrikes me as an awful idea.
However,
#72
Posted 21 May 2007 - 07:31 PM
[spoiler]The Indiana Jones IV information keeps rolling in (read last night's revelation of Shia LaBeouf's character and the film's plotline here), thanks to
#73
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:29 PM
I suppose it makes some sense, with the "Chariots of the Gods" theory that aliens were involved with Easter Island and the building of pyramids/temples, along with aliens being big in the 50s, but I'm not into it.
#74
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:31 PM
You mean they weren't!?I didn't like the idea of an alien-based story when I first heard it rumored a decade ago, and I'm not too enthused with it now...
I suppose it makes some sense, with the "Chariots of the Gods" theory that aliens were involved with Easter Island and the building of pyramids/temples, along with aliens being big in the 50s, but I'm not into it.
#75
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:37 PM
#76
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:37 AM
#77
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:35 AM
Besides, hasn't Stargate dealt with the same terriorty as Chariots of the Gods? Plus, I am still holding out hope Indy doesn't have a son. . . just b/c it has been rumored Indy had a son/daughter forever now. For someone as secretive as Lucas is on this project, there appears to be way too much info hitting the net lately. Could someone just be stirring the nest?
Or, these rumors are completely true.
#78
Posted 22 May 2007 - 02:03 AM
The story always breaks. Secrecy is impossible these days. And with more and more people having to be in the know as production gets geared up... well, it's natural that somebody out there knows what's going on (hell, we had many plot details for each of the Star Wars prequels as the films began production).For someone as secretive as Lucas is on this project, there appears to be way too much info hitting the net lately. Could someone just be stirring the nest?
At the very least, the relic and basic concept is. The webmaster of CHUD has personally read the Frank Darabont draft, and we know the relic has been kept the same since then.Or, these rumors are completely true.
#79
Posted 22 May 2007 - 02:30 AM
I'm indifferent to the rest of the info (it doesn't sound good, doesn't sound bad... it's just the kind of details I'd anticipate from an INDY IV).
Well, here are the most recent pics of Harrison Ford, from last night. So this provides a peek about what he'll look like when he puts on the fedora in a few weeks:
#80
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:42 AM
Good to hear that Karen Allen's in it.
Harrison Ford looks pretty good in those pics, I have to say.
#81
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:53 AM
And Ford DOES look really well, and is perfect for the aged Indiana. He's gonna kick !
#82
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:18 AM
The story always breaks. Secrecy is impossible these days.
Tell me about it. I was determined not to know how THE SOPRANOS ends, but now I do (or at least I'm pretty sure I do), and it wasn't even thanks to the internet but to picking up a tabloid on the Tube and idly flicking through it.
And if movie geek sites and the print media don't give far too much away about a film, you can trust its trailers to do so.
#83
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:59 PM
Indy's own universe has confirmed the existence of God. After all, he did find the Cup of Christ and the Ark. Now, if the 4th movie uses this book as a basis for plot and relic, I am confused completely.
First of all, while it is a fun theory, it has been pretty rejected by scientists (including reports of doctored evidence in his book). It seems wierd that they are using this book to begin with.
Also, how does this book allow for the existence of God as defined by the previous Indy movies? The idea is that all ancient civs were influenced by alien visitors (they built the pyraminds and stuff). So, where exaclty does this place the role of God in these movies? He created aliens, who then visited Earth and shaped the culture as we know it, then God stepped back in and sent down the Ark with its secret army, then sent Christ (who in turn drank from the cup which survived until Indy's discovery)? But then, of course, if there is aliens, then that kinda makes the creation account in the Bible (as well as many sections) invalid.
Like I said, maybe I am thinking about this too much, but considering how long this movie has been waiting for a script, I find it hard to believe no one else has thought about it like this.
#84
Posted 22 May 2007 - 04:23 PM
Yeah. It's bad. Even movies that try as hard to keep things secret as possible (THE DARK KNIGHT and INDIANA JONES IV) eventually suffer leaks. And the worst thing about it, is now the general media reports spoilers all the time... there's no "safe zone" from them.Tell me about it. I was determined not to know how THE SOPRANOS ends, but now I do (or at least I'm pretty sure I do), and it wasn't even thanks to the internet but to picking up a tabloid on the Tube and idly flicking through it.The story always breaks. Secrecy is impossible these days.
And if movie geek sites and the print media don't give far too much away about a film, you can trust its trailers to do so.
#85
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:13 PM
[box]Earlier this week I brought you big news about Indiana Jones IV (still titled Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods, but that could change at a moment's notice). I got more info than I shared with you, but I held it back for the simple fact that I don't know what's a spoiler and what's not at this point. I only ran stuff that I felt would be revealed in trailers and basic synopses, such as the general plotline and characters.
When looking to back up what I ran earlier this week, IESB uncovered a piece of info that I sat on, and they reported it, so now I'm reporting it as well: Cate Blanchett is the baddie in the film, and she's been seen in the last week running around in a Soviet military uniform (that's some pre-production stuff, I believe, not actually shooting anything).
I'm glad that IESB backed up what I ran (nice "typo" on their sourcing, by the way. I laughed!), but I am going to go on record saying that I am not 100% sure that the Area 51 scene is the opening. I've based that on some assumptions and Darabont's draft. Also, and this is probably a major spoiler, so I'll keep it blacked out:
IESB promises to get some more info in the coming weeks. I think we're on the verge of having this movie spoiled to already, so I'd like to plead to these guys to consider dialing it back a little, although it's quite possible that they won
#86
Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:04 PM
#87
Posted 25 May 2007 - 12:50 AM
I was determined not to know how THE SOPRANOS ends, but now I do (or at least I'm pretty sure I do), and it wasn't even thanks to the internet but to picking up a tabloid on the Tube and idly flicking through it.
I wouldn't bet on that: apparently they've shot three different endings so who knows which one will be used and knowing David Chase it will be something that we haven't heard of before so don't be too upset
What exactly did you hear? I frequent a Sopranos message board and we've been separating fact from fiction with these reports for some time.
Sorry for going off-topic
#88
Posted 25 May 2007 - 03:29 AM
There's an air of uncertainty about his comments. It certainly seems thatHe doesn't believe
Spoiler
#89
Posted 25 May 2007 - 04:21 AM
Uh... well, the physical relic is all fine. It's the fact that INDY IV seems to have everything to do with aliens. Frankly, that idea sucks. Religious relics, please.I think its hard to judge the relic based upon a brief summary. After all, the Sankara stones don't seem all that wonderful, but Temple of Doom was still classic.
Actually, I think it's interesting...there are ancient images in Peru and in Mexico that denote "space men". I think we've seen enough religious stuff...but I think they could gone after the Ark of Noah on mount Arrarat in Turkey(as legend states that's the resting place) or maybe Atlantis...but we'll see. I've been *very* anti-Indy 4 but I think the 80s fanboy in me will cave in when I see the first trailor.
#90
Posted 25 May 2007 - 07:01 AM
I was determined not to know how THE SOPRANOS ends, but now I do (or at least I'm pretty sure I do), and it wasn't even thanks to the internet but to picking up a tabloid on the Tube and idly flicking through it.
I wouldn't bet on that: apparently they've shot three different endings so who knows which one will be used and knowing David Chase it will be something that we haven't heard of before so don't be too upset
What exactly did you hear? I frequent a Sopranos message board and we've been separating fact from fiction with these reports for some time.
That the final episode would be
Which message board are you referring to? I'm not a member of any SOPRANOS sites, but would be interested in having a look at a good one.