
Omega in 'QoS'
#151
Posted 18 March 2008 - 06:29 PM
#152
Posted 18 March 2008 - 08:30 PM
sorry for linking fake links on fake omegas but how many of you want the PO to be the new 007 watch ?
I do! Because I own one (42mm on stainless strap).
#153
Posted 18 March 2008 - 10:02 PM
Thanks for policing yourself on this. I hate having to act as ad hoc Moderator on this subject, but keeping our distance from such disreputable vendors not only keeps the integrity of what we're doing here high (and, unfortunately, unique, when compared to some less responsible Forums!), but also helps create a place where folks can come for advice and be assured they're less likely to be sent off in the wrong direction.sorry for linking fake links on fake omegas ...
Since my collection is so narrowly focused on James Bond wristwatches, my first answer to your question is to confess that I'll eventually end up w/ whatever the Quantum of Solace watch or watches turn out to be! For me, then, the better question would be, "which would be most likely to garner the most wrist time?" to which I'd answer (tho' not guarantee) "the 42mm Planet Ocean on the stainless steel bracelet."... how many of you want the PO to be the new 007 watch ?

Edited by Dell Deaton, 18 March 2008 - 10:10 PM.
#154
Posted 19 March 2008 - 07:27 AM
http://www.rolexrefe...articles/2.html
I just finished reviewing GOLDFINGER and LIVE AND LET DIE dvds as these two clearly show the Submariner on Connery and Moore...and neither has the date magnifier "bubble" on the crystal.
QUESTION for the retailers and afficianados in this thread:
Is it possible to get the Submariner without the date magnifier on the crystal (i.e. get the Sea-Dweller crystal to replace the Submariner's)?
#155
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:56 AM
Of course, there's a $6,000 difference (among other things) between a Rolex and an Invicta.

The simpler and slightly more expensive option would be to buy a SeaDweller instead, although that model is thicker than the Submariner. The cheaper option would be to get the non-date Submariner, which is a nice watch. Gives off a real Connery circa 1964 vibe, too.
Vodka Martino
*The kind of watch-maker who should do this would have to be like the Muhammad Ali/ Tiger Woods/ Dalai Lama/ Frank Sinatra of watchmakers. Not a job for the faint-hearted.
Edited by Vodka Martino, 19 March 2008 - 10:59 AM.
#156
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:43 PM
You're looking for a Rolex Submariner, reference 14060M, which looks something like the following image (and comes on a metal bracelet).... I just finished reviewing GOLDFINGER and LIVE AND LET DIE dvds as these two clearly show the Seamaster on Connery and Moore...and neither has the date magnifier "bubble" on the crystal.... Is it possible to get the Submariner without the date magnifier on the crystal (i.e. get the Sea-Dweller crystal to replace the Submariner's)?

The present version of this has a bit more bling, in that the word "Rolex" repeats w/in the inner cirumference under the crystal, and it's now an "Officially Certified" chronometer, meaning more lines of text above the 6 o'clock position. The Connery and Moore Subs did not have white-gold surrounds on the markers, which may bother you w/ the new; they also had a lesser depth resistance, and plastic, domed, as opposed to the present sapphire, flat crystals. The early Connery examples don't have crown guards, and the bezel markings are different. That said, it's just too hard to avoid getting stuck w/ a fake to risk anything but buying new if you're not prepared to spend a lot of time studying up.
Personally, I'd never recommend changing out crystals and/or removing the date window.
PS: So far as I know, the Sea Dweller was never a James Bond watch. It's a completely different animal altogether.
Edited by Dell Deaton, 19 March 2008 - 02:45 PM.
#157
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:35 PM
Thanks for policing yourself on this. I hate having to act as ad hoc Moderator on this subject,sorry for linking fake links on fake omegas ...
Sure !

#158
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:14 PM
Not really...
The simpler and slightly more expensive option would be to buy a SeaDweller instead, although that model is thicker than the Submariner. The cheaper option would be to get the non-date Submariner, which is a nice watch.
Thank you Vodka...

You're looking for a Rolex Submariner, reference 14060M, which looks something like the following image (and comes on a metal bracelet).
The present version of this has a bit more bling, in that the word "Rolex" repeats w/in the inner cirumference under the crystal, and it's now an "Officially Certified" chronometer, meaning more lines of text above the 6 o'clock position. The Connery and Moore Subs did not have white-gold surrounds on the markers, which may bother you w/ the new; they also had a lesser depth resistance, and plastic, domed, as opposed to the present sapphire, flat crystals. The early Connery examples don't have crown guards, and the bezel markings are different. That said, it's just too hard to avoid getting stuck w/ a fake to risk anything but buying new if you're not prepared to spend a lot of time studying up.
Personally, I'd never recommend changing out crystals and/or removing the date window.
That's awsome...The Moore version, however, was heavily 'modified' by Syd Cain...so i'm not worried about that.
May I ask what the watch would retail for? Am I looking at US$5,500~ish?
Also, did Dalton's have the date magnifier?
Please and thank you.

#159
Posted 19 March 2008 - 05:03 PM
#160
Posted 19 March 2008 - 05:04 PM
You're looking for a Rolex Submariner, reference 14060M, which looks something like the following image (and comes on a metal bracelet).... I just finished reviewing GOLDFINGER and LIVE AND LET DIE dvds as these two clearly show the Seamaster on Connery and Moore...and neither has the date magnifier "bubble" on the crystal.... Is it possible to get the Submariner without the date magnifier on the crystal (i.e. get the Sea-Dweller crystal to replace the Submariner's)?
The present version of this has a bit more bling, in that the word "Rolex" repeats w/in the inner cirumference under the crystal, and it's now an "Officially Certified" chronometer, meaning more lines of text above the 6 o'clock position. The Connery and Moore Subs did not have white-gold surrounds on the markers, which may bother you w/ the new; they also had a lesser depth resistance, and plastic, domed, as opposed to the present sapphire, flat crystals. The early Connery examples don't have crown guards, and the bezel markings are different. That said, it's just too hard to avoid getting stuck w/ a fake to risk anything but buying new if you're not prepared to spend a lot of time studying up.
Personally, I'd never recommend changing out crystals and/or removing the date window.
PS: So far as I know, the Sea Dweller was never a James Bond watch. It's a completely different animal altogether.
Dell and others - great thread. Own a Submariner myself for a decade (dateless - I don't like the bubble myself) - does anyone have any suggestions for where to find a good selection of NATO straps? Found one website but it's colours where limited.
#161
Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:07 PM
does anyone have any suggestions for where to find a good selection of NATO straps? Found one website but it's colours where limited.
Same Here I've Been Searching For NATO Straps for Awhile Now!!
#162
Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:41 PM
#163
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:02 PM
Another good strap site is found at www.strappedfortime.com, however, I don't know if they carry NATO straps.
I concurSince Brosnan worn the blue Omega Seamaster in Goldeneye I liked it. But in CR Daniel Craig wears also a Planet Ocean which looks great, but I hope that the special edition with the black dial for QOS is only a collectors edition.
#164
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:33 PM
In order to help organize my own responses as much as anything else, I've responded to the last few questions directed to me above in the "Buy, Swap, Sell & Auction (Collecting)" Forum, under the "Watches, James Bond Watches" Thread there. This includes important links to information on current Rolex pricing, my NATO strap source, and details on the Dalton-Bond Rolex from Licence to Kill.
Please accept my apology for the role I've played in not keeping this Thread neater.

#165
Posted 20 March 2008 - 08:41 AM
Thank you Vodka...
What, if I may ask, is the price point differential of the above two? Is the Sea-Dweller north of US$6,000?
I'm not up on US prices, but down under in Australia where I live, the Submariner date model (16610) retails for $7,400AUD. The SeaDweller is around 3 to 4 hundred dollars more, I think. However, since I couldn't/wouldn't/shouldn't spend more than five grand on a watch, I don't tend to keep up with brand-new Rolex prices. When the day comes that I get myself a Sub, I'll be going second-hand.
Vodka Martino
#166
Posted 20 March 2008 - 09:38 AM
http://www.tudorwatch.com/
Everyone is aware about its history I suppose ?

#167
Posted 20 March 2008 - 01:12 PM
See "Collecting" Forum Thread for my reply.Got a Tudor myself.... Everyone is aware about its history I suppose ?
#168
Posted 20 March 2008 - 01:28 PM
QUOTE(HildebrandRarity @ 19 March 2008 - 10:14)
QUOTE(Dell Deaton @ 19 March 2008 - 12:43)
You're looking for a Rolex Submariner, reference 14060M.... Personally, I'd never recommend changing out crystals and/or removing the date window.
---------
That's awsome...The Moore version, however, was heavily 'modified' by Syd Cain...so i'm not worried about that....
---------
Not sure what point you're trying to make here. Could you help me out? (I suspect this could head to a much larger discussion.)
---------
Syd Cain, the art director (i.e. the (approximate) equivalent of Ken Adam) on Live And Let Die, had about four watches from Rolex modified. One modification was the hour markers turning from silver/white (I believe) to red when the bezel was rotated clockwise about 5 minutes - in order to 'magnitize' the watch on film...the other was to have the the edges of the bezel sharpened and motorized for fast rotation - in order to create the 'buzz saw' effect on screen.
#169
Posted 20 March 2008 - 04:06 PM
Does anyone remember some of the Internet chatter before Casino Royale was released, where it was "predicted" that James Bond would start out wearing a Planet Ocean, then be given a blue on blue Seamaster w/ his Double-0 rank? I laughed out loud at the hubris (as if MI6 would actually use a wristwatch to convey status! Even as a fan of the study, I think that's crossing a line of serious fantasy, altho maybe agents are given gold watches upon retirment... Honestly i cant see them bringing in the black version of the seamaster i think its just gonna be the PO and blue seamaster in the begening

Since then, I've actually seen at least one coffee table book that's recorded this intention as fact. Guess the author didn't take the time to actually watch Casino Royale and note that the PO survived well into Bond's first 007 efforts.
But who knows? Maybe in Quantum of Solace, James Bond becomes a watch collector and three or more watches would make sense. Or, as in On Her Majesty's Secret Service (novel and movie), he takes on some sort of cover, and that requires multiple pieces. Or, like in Tomorrow Never Dies, he is offered a selection: If he actually tries on a few before deciding, that would make them all, technically, "James Bond" watches (if not his "choice").
#170
Posted 21 March 2008 - 07:26 PM
PS: So far as I know, the Sea Dweller was never a James Bond watch. It's a completely different animal altogether.
Yes, of course. Being more expensive AND not being a 'James Bond watch' would definitely want one to shy away from purchasing the Sea-Dweller...unless you were a deep sea diver AND had money to burn.

Thanks for all the outstanding info, good Sir Dell!

#171
Posted 29 March 2008 - 08:59 PM
#172
Posted 29 March 2008 - 09:47 PM
I was very confused during CR promotions as it showed 00 wearing few different watches and the publicity actually had a him wearing QOS mentioned watch(Premiere Magazine). Also when I tried to buy it in Singapore a great place to buy watches I found out that they didn't have the PO (rubber) instead a very tacky CR engraved which had awful sweep hand or Orange Bezel. So ended up not buying.
But most importantly I am getting a bit tired of the 00 Product Placements and Omegas are far too common these days. Thinking of buying U-boat instead or even a Rolex.
#173
Posted 29 March 2008 - 09:54 PM
#174
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:51 AM
As I alluded to in my Post on Page 5 of this Thread, BaselWorld: The Watch and Jewellery Show will likely produce some spy photos, if not formal confirmation of one or more of the James Bond wristwatches for Quantum of Solace. That trade fair opens on April 3, and runs through the 10th.When are we suppose to get confrimation on what products are going to be in QOS especially omega
That said, trade shows can be a tricky deal. Signage can get switches, if not created in Photo Shop, and word-of-mouth is never as accountable as publication. I watched things very closely in the lead-up to Casino Royale, and I seem to recall that it wasn't until May that Omega SA formally announced the blue, blue Seamaster (basically an update of the Pierce Brosnan model), and still was not confirming a Planet Ocean of any kind at that point.
Then you'd probably be more interested in the Thread we've got going in the CBn "Buy, Swap, Sell & Auction (Collecting)" Forum titled, "Watches, James Bond Watches."Thanks for the updates guys it's nice to know we have some idea of what watch 00 will be wearing ... most importantly I am getting a bit tired of the 00 Product Placements and Omegas are far too common these days. Thinking of buying U-boat instead or even a Rolex.
See ya over there!

#175
Posted 09 April 2008 - 07:31 AM
#176
Posted 09 April 2008 - 01:13 PM
Further to your observation, you might find an entry of interest that I made just this week on my blog titled, "So what if it is a Planet Ocean?" At least four variations immediately come into play ~ before you get into chronographs.From the new pics in Chile you can kind of tell he is wearing a planet ocean on steel....
Meantime, welcome to CBn and some of the best James Bond watch threads on the Internet!

#177
Posted 29 April 2008 - 04:02 PM
#178
Posted 29 April 2008 - 04:16 PM
Agreed. There are several others in this batch as well, some giving even stronger indication that we're talking Omega Planet Ocean here.by the looks of the bracelet, it appears to be a PO....
As I said on my blog, however, "Planet Ocean" can mean a lot of things!
Nice to see this Thread bumped back up again.

#179
Posted 29 April 2008 - 05:52 PM
Agreed. There are several others in this batch as well, some giving even stronger indication that we're talking Omega Planet Ocean here.by the looks of the bracelet, it appears to be a PO....
As I said on my blog, however, "Planet Ocean" can mean a lot of things!
Nice to see this Thread bumped back up again.
Just out of curiosity, do all characters in Bond films wear Omega's? We know that In CR the Dealer at Casino Royale Sports The Red Speedmaster...any other 'subtle' Omega references (other than Bond's, obviously). How about during the Brosnan era?
Attached Files
#180
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:13 PM
Off the top of my head, the only ones I can remember is the Omega stopwatch in DAD, and 006's companion Seamaster in GE.Agreed. There are several others in this batch as well, some giving even stronger indication that we're talking Omega Planet Ocean here.by the looks of the bracelet, it appears to be a PO....
As I said on my blog, however, "Planet Ocean" can mean a lot of things!
Nice to see this Thread bumped back up again.
Just out of curiosity, do all characters in Bond films wear Omega's? We know that In CR the Dealer at Casino Royale Sports The Red Speedmaster...any other 'subtle' Omega references (other than Bond's, obviously). How about during the Brosnan era?