I have to say, I don't get the complaints over the running time. As Loomis said in another thread, "It's not how long a movie is, it's how long a movie feels."It still sounds like it's going to be a bit of a trial to sit through but their marketing is certainly very striking.
It's a personal thing - I have come to dislike having to sit in a cinema with a lot of restless infants and disruptive teenagers and mobile phones and (continues like this for several minutes of old fartery). Anything over two hours of that, regardless of what's up there in front of me, is unutterably vile. I expect one of the few times I will go to the cinema this year will be Quantum of Solace. I did like Batman Begins, though, so I'm not totally averse to a bit of Bat and will therefore catch it later - although I do wonder about those who would mythologise a comic book.
I'm just curious, but how long is THE DARK KNIGHT supposed to be? I had heard a while back that they were talking about 3 hours, but then I thought that I had heard that the estimate had been made that it wouldn't be close to 3 hours.
I do have to agree with the quoted post, however, that if it is a 3 hour film, then I'll probably pass on it until it reaches DVD. THE DARK KNIGHT was to be the one film that I was going to see in theaters this year, but at three hours of the unnecessary annoyances that one runs into at the movie theaters, it's just too long of a running time to try to ignore those problems.