The Next James Bond?
#541
Posted 10 July 2004 - 10:01 AM
#542
Posted 10 July 2004 - 01:28 PM
A pity Adrian Paul is not on the list.
In 1995 when they chose Brosnan, Paul was is the final list of three people.
Not bad at all!!
#543
Posted 10 July 2004 - 03:18 PM
#544
Posted 10 July 2004 - 10:34 PM
Yes Cesari I heard that too--in fact he was suppose to have ended the runner-up in the end and that if negotiations went bad with Pierce he may have ended up as Bond.I put my vote on Christian Bale who is my second choice after Adrian Paul.
A pity Adrian Paul is not on the list.
In 1995 when they chose Brosnan, Paul was is the final list of three people.
Not bad at all!!
#545
Posted 11 July 2004 - 02:01 AM
He was among the final ones when Pierce got it. He was told then he was too young.
And it's rumored that he was asked to talk to producers again when it wasn't certain if Pierce would come back a couple of years ago.
As much as some are convinced he doesn't stand a chance....the fact is the producers don't share that opinion.
#546
Posted 11 July 2004 - 02:19 AM
thank god! I'm tired of Pierce.As much as some are convinced he doesn't stand a chance....the fact is the producers don't share that opinion.
#547
Posted 11 July 2004 - 02:19 AM
I wonder if it has to be taken into account how many times the other contenders auditioned also. I never knew the extent of Paul's relation with Bond.I can't remember if it was at a convention Q & A or if I read his quote in an interview in a magazine somewhere, ( I'm thinking magazine) but I remember the number....Adrian Paul was asked about going out for Bond and he said he had been called back and auditioned...hmm....let's see....7 times!
#548
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:03 AM
#549
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:03 AM
That's what I am hoping for also.Please, let the EON Producers pick Hugh Jackman as 007.
#550
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:07 AM
#551
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:32 AM
Nor do I have a problem with some of the other choices, also. Jackman just seems to be my fav currently.Thanks Qwerty.
#552
Posted 12 July 2004 - 03:11 AM
Jackman, on the other hand, has real charisma. He's got quite the screen presence and attractiveness to pull off the Bond role. He also has a dark side that I really like.
I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#553
Posted 12 July 2004 - 03:43 AM
I'd be interested to see if he could be as deadly as Dalton was in some of his scenes as James Bond. Wonder if he would read up on Fleming, and that sort.I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#554
Posted 12 July 2004 - 03:53 AM
I think he very well could be (judging from his performance as Wolverine) and he'd be able to the humor - something Dalton couldn't. I don't know if he'd read Fleming or not.I'd be interested to see if he could be as deadly as Dalton was in some of his scenes as James Bond. Wonder if he would read up on Fleming, and that sort.I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#555
Posted 12 July 2004 - 03:54 AM
Yeah, kind of seems like a good mix. Humor and the customary deadly style of Connery.I think he very well could be (judging from his performance as Wolverine) and he'd be able to the humor - something Dalton couldn't. I don't know if he'd read Fleming or not.
I'd be interested to see if he could be as deadly as Dalton was in some of his scenes as James Bond. Wonder if he would read up on Fleming, and that sort.I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#556
Posted 12 July 2004 - 04:01 AM
Definitely. I tend to think he'd be more Connery pt. II than Brosnan pt. II. Brosnan had his own distinctive sensitivity that I think Jackman would shun in favor of the Connery macho-ness.Yeah, kind of seems like a good mix. Humor and the customary deadly style of Connery.
I think he very well could be (judging from his performance as Wolverine) and he'd be able to the humor - something Dalton couldn't. I don't know if he'd read Fleming or not.
I'd be interested to see if he could be as deadly as Dalton was in some of his scenes as James Bond. Wonder if he would read up on Fleming, and that sort.I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#557
Posted 12 July 2004 - 04:05 AM
Yes. That's what I think could make him a very successful Bond.Definitely. I tend to think he'd be more Connery pt. II than Brosnan pt. II. Brosnan had his own distinctive sensitivity that I think Jackman would shun in favor of the Connery macho-ness.
Yeah, kind of seems like a good mix. Humor and the customary deadly style of Connery.
I think he very well could be (judging from his performance as Wolverine) and he'd be able to the humor - something Dalton couldn't. I don't know if he'd read Fleming or not.
I'd be interested to see if he could be as deadly as Dalton was in some of his scenes as James Bond. Wonder if he would read up on Fleming, and that sort.I have a feeling he'd give us a more Connery-style 007. He'd move away from the touchy-feely stuff that Brosnan introduced and come back to the macho, tough-guy side of Bond. When he wants to, he can look as deadly, if not more deadly, than any Bond who has come before.
#558
Posted 12 July 2004 - 06:47 AM
But if the producers want the series go to a more broader, larger audience, go with Jackman. He's the actor to bring more movie tickets. So what if he's Austrailian? Forget the past about George Lazenby. He wasn't a box-office star then. He has everything to become Bond.
#559
Posted 12 July 2004 - 06:48 AM
I believe Clive Owen is British.Well, right now I'm having a parlysis between picking Owen and Jackman. Owen seems more darker, ala Dalton. I've seem him act in King Arthur and I must say I was very impressed in his performance. He has the acting chops, and has Fleming's literary Bond dead-on. What part nationality is he, Welsh, British?
#560
Posted 12 July 2004 - 06:52 AM
There you go then.I believe Clive Owen is British.Well, right now I'm having a parlysis between picking Owen and Jackman. Owen seems more darker, ala Dalton. I've seem him act in King Arthur and I must say I was very impressed in his performance. He has the acting chops, and has Fleming's literary Bond dead-on. What part nationality is he, Welsh, British?
I dislike all the other candiates some of you have mentioned. Ewan McGregor? Good actor, but no James Bond. Chrisian Bale, one of my favorite actors, but I can't see him as Bond. Robbie Williams? (shoot me!! )
#561
Posted 12 July 2004 - 06:53 AM
I don't know why that name has popped up those times, other than the usual rumor grind. Let the man stick with singing, which he is good at.Robbie Williams? (shoot me!! )
But Bond? Honestly.
#562
Posted 12 July 2004 - 02:01 PM
o.k! here we go. settle down at the back. (qwerty! don't do that!)What part nationality is he, Welsh, British?
now great britain(the united kingdom) is, in fact made up of two countries(scotland andengland),a princiality(wales), and of course northern ireland(lets not even start on that one) what i think s.a may have been saying when he said he thought owen was british was that he is english.one can be both british and welsh. a common enough mistak amongst colonial types. one has to be indulgent of them sometimes.
#563
Posted 12 July 2004 - 02:05 PM
Ah, well Spectre Assassin mentioned both Welsh and British in his question. I knew Owen was British so that's the one I replied.o.k! here we go. settle down at the back. (qwerty! don't do that!)What part nationality is he, Welsh, British?
#564
Posted 12 July 2004 - 11:04 PM
thanks for clearing that up, quiller. I was asking that question since I read that Clive Owen was Welsh, and didn't understand the context of his nationality.o.k! here we go. settle down at the back. (qwerty! don't do that!)What part nationality is he, Welsh, British?
now great britain(the united kingdom) is, in fact made up of two countries(scotland andengland),a princiality(wales), and of course northern ireland(lets not even start on that one) what i think s.a may have been saying when he said he thought owen was british was that he is english.one can be both british and welsh. a common enough mistak amongst colonial types. one has to be indulgent of them sometimes.
#565
Posted 13 July 2004 - 11:20 AM
#566
Posted 14 July 2004 - 02:38 AM
You got your statement backwords. It should be, Bond can be American. What he can't be is black. The only black bond should be is bruises on his body. If he is black in the next one, whats the excuse? James Bond pulled a Michael Jackson in reverse. Its disgusting just to think of it and if that even happens James Bond is dead to me.Bond can be black. What he can't be is American.
PS: I don't mean to be racist but I really don't like that idea. Also I think Colin Salamon is great actor and is good as the character he is.
#567
Posted 14 July 2004 - 03:53 PM
true! true!Usually it's just safer to go with "British".
#568
Posted 14 July 2004 - 06:22 PM
#569
Posted 14 July 2004 - 10:05 PM
James Purefoy
#570
Posted 15 July 2004 - 01:29 AM
I thought you wanted McGregor or Paul?the next James Bond is:
James Purefoy