PLUS...
Doctor Who (Series 9)
#1711
Posted 25 June 2010 - 03:23 PM
PLUS...
#1712
Posted 25 June 2010 - 03:30 PM
#1713
Posted 25 June 2010 - 03:33 PM
* More explanation on the first point...
#1714
Posted 25 June 2010 - 03:47 PM
#1715
Posted 25 June 2010 - 04:00 PM
Are we going to find out that Amy Pond and River Song are one in the same tomorrow...?
#1716
Posted 25 June 2010 - 06:27 PM
Matt Smith has revealed that an "important character" will return to Doctor Who in Saturday's finale.
Speaking on This Morning, Smith added that he was emotional when he watched the episode.
"There's an important character coming back, but I can't say who," he said. "But it is very significant - it's a cracker!"
"I watched it and was quite emotional probably because it was the end of the series and we'd worked so hard and we'd got there. I watched it with Karen [Gillan] and we were like, 'Woo hoo!'"
Smith also revealed that he feels more comfortable playing the Doctor now.
"[Filming the series] was quite an intense experience and it was quite hard work, and the pressure of taking over the mantle of David [Tennant] was present," he said. "But I feel I've grown in confidence and I can't wait to start series two... and I'm going to read the Christmas episode this week!"
#1717
Posted 26 June 2010 - 01:32 PM
#1718
Posted 26 June 2010 - 06:28 PM
Roll on Christmas.
#1719
Posted 26 June 2010 - 06:40 PM
2) Very entertaining.
3) Matt Smith was excellent.
4) Fezes are cool.
5) The end of The Eleventh Hour wasn't explained.
Well, let's hope it's better thanRoll on Christmas.
Spoiler
#1720
Posted 26 June 2010 - 09:04 PM
#1721
Posted 27 June 2010 - 12:57 AM
#1722
Posted 27 June 2010 - 09:29 AM
But the difference was Smith. When the show finally became "his" after the face to face with Amy - before he was shot into where ever he was shot into - didn't he confirm he really gets WHO, gets the emotional level required?
Not the angsty, OTT scenery chewing of Tennant's Dr Suffering.
Brilliant, subtle stuff from Smithy.
#1723
Posted 27 June 2010 - 12:26 PM
There were some great moments:
http://unrealityshou...ts-the-big-bang
#1724
Posted 27 June 2010 - 03:58 PM
I think the difference with this reset is how it actually used the shows preexisting lore and logic....too often RTD just made stuff up out of nowhere, no precedent no discipline and no way the audience could be involved in the evolution of a solution.Similar reset theme to most of RTD's stuff. Can't anybody be original anymore????
But the difference was Smith. When the show finally became "his" after the face to face with Amy - before he was shot into where ever he was shot into - didn't he confirm he really gets WHO, gets the emotional level required?
Not the angsty, OTT scenery chewing of Tennant's Dr Suffering.
Brilliant, subtle stuff from Smithy.
Agree absolutely about the emotional level, Smith is one of the orginal style Doctors 1-4 in style and feel, yet the series is bang up to date...just what I want in 'Who'.
#1725
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:52 PM
#1726
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:53 PM
But yes. The Big Bang, VERY good episode, and a fitting end to the series. Roll on Christmas and Series 6.
#1727
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:56 PM
HF
Oh, Mharkin, I can't stop humming the new Doctor's theme. I love it:)
#1728
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:58 PM
#1729
Posted 28 June 2010 - 09:30 AM
IMDB is absolute rubbish tosh. It gets some of its listings right (which is not rocket science when people are contributing for you) but I would never use it for the final word on anything. It is also used-led.Ok. So,
Spoiler
#1730
Posted 28 June 2010 - 12:16 PM
IMDB is absolute rubbish tosh. It gets some of its listings right (which is not rocket science when people are contributing for you) but I would never use it for the final word on anything. It is also used-led.Ok. So,
Spoiler
I think thats true, I also suspect that misinfomration may have been employed to disguise who or what is really behind it although my money is that the guy building the home made TARDIS and behind to plot to erase all of Creation using the Doctors TARDIS is... (not really a spoiler as I dont know but in case anyone wants a clean view of next season)
#1731
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:06 PM
#1732
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:08 PM
I think the difference with this reset is how it actually used the shows preexisting lore and logic....too often RTD just made stuff up out of nowhere, no precedent no discipline and no way the audience could be involved in the evolution of a solution.Similar reset theme to most of RTD's stuff. Can't anybody be original anymore????
But the difference was Smith. When the show finally became "his" after the face to face with Amy - before he was shot into where ever he was shot into - didn't he confirm he really gets WHO, gets the emotional level required?
Not the angsty, OTT scenery chewing of Tennant's Dr Suffering.
Brilliant, subtle stuff from Smithy.
Agree absolutely about the emotional level, Smith is one of the orginal style Doctors 1-4 in style and feel, yet the series is bang up to date...just what I want in 'Who'.
If this had been on a similar reset theme to RTD's stuff the plot wouldn't make sense, there'd be more technononsense in order to get the plot out of the way so we can get to the crying, and then there'd be even more crying.
I genuinely prefer the satisfying plot resolution of this episode to the feeling of being emotionally manipulated by the hollow and means-to-an-end plotting of Journey's End or End of Time. Neither approach is perfect, and I'd like to have more of the scenes like the Tenth Doctor talking to Wilf on the spaceship where a genuine emotional connection is made, but ultimately RTD's finales were just some Big Scenes he'd thought of, strung together by plotting that didn't make sense but was just there to bridge the gaps between the Big Scenes. This episode actually showed you how and why the plot was going to be resolved, rather than just telling you that it's resolved so they could get to a bit of crying in the TARDIS.
He's a clever plotter, that Moffat. I loved the 'something old, something new...' etc. idea, and even the Fez had a part to play in the plot as well as being really funny!
#1733
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:14 PM
#1734
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:15 PM
#1735
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:53 PM
No. In this instance, mis-information is not employed by people on the likes of IMDB. To be fair, the creators of a show/juggernaut like DOCTOR WHO have slightly more pressing things occupying their time.
Oh I dont know, the Radio Times used to put anagrams of the Master's name in print to keep his involvement a mystery...its nothing more than a progression of the same concept adapted for an increasingly infomation soaked viewership.
Agree about the 'something old, something new....' deceptively simple but brilliant in the way it comes across.
#1736
Posted 28 June 2010 - 02:18 PM
Yeah, the RADIO TIMES is not connected to the people that make DOCTOR WHO - other than they all come under the BBC umbrella. I really don't think the DOCTOR WHO camp worry about false rumours. The fans cover that for them anyway - as this last week has shown.No. In this instance, mis-information is not employed by people on the likes of IMDB. To be fair, the creators of a show/juggernaut like DOCTOR WHO have slightly more pressing things occupying their time.
Oh I dont know, the Radio Times used to put anagrams of the Master's name in print to keep his involvement a mystery...its nothing more than a progression of the same concept adapted for an increasingly infomation soaked viewership.
Agree about the 'something old, something new....' deceptively simple but brilliant in the way it comes across.
#1737
Posted 28 June 2010 - 03:10 PM
Yeah, the RADIO TIMES is not connected to the people that make DOCTOR WHO - other than they all come under the BBC umbrella. I really don't think the DOCTOR WHO camp worry about false rumours. The fans cover that for them anyway - as this last week has shown.No. In this instance, mis-information is not employed by people on the likes of IMDB. To be fair, the creators of a show/juggernaut like DOCTOR WHO have slightly more pressing things occupying their time.
Oh I dont know, the Radio Times used to put anagrams of the Master's name in print to keep his involvement a mystery...its nothing more than a progression of the same concept adapted for an increasingly infomation soaked viewership.
Agree about the 'something old, something new....' deceptively simple but brilliant in the way it comes across.
Off the top of my head; Terry Malloy was credited onscreen (not just in the RT) as 'Roy Tromelly' in Remembrance of the Daleks to hide the fact that the Dalek Emperor was Davros. That also happened with the Master too: 'Neil Toynay' in Castrovalva for example.
RTD used to flat-out lie about what was and wasn't happening and was quite happy about it! I think he denied that he'd ever bring Davros or the Master back but had already filmed episodes starring one of them!
#1738
Posted 28 June 2010 - 03:23 PM
LOVE this guy!
#1739
Posted 28 June 2010 - 03:47 PM
Upstage is maybe the wrong word but Smith was indeed superb.... and has an edge over Tennent already.Over the weekend I was told from a fairly good source that word from the DOCTOR WHO set is that Matt Smith is hot amazing in the role and could well upstage Mr Tennent quite quickly.
#1740
Posted 28 June 2010 - 03:51 PM