So does this mean we have to let the Bond who just kept going for Queen and Country behind when he "retired" in 2002, and instead have him with far more personal demons and motives than before until he finds some sort of resolution to decide what to do with his life?
Or when Craig's journey comes to an end, is it another "reboot" to have a new version of James Bond not always hurting and acting like a rogue man with a personal mission to accomplish?
I see the problem, having only four films so far with Craig-Bond, and all of them depict situations that are tied to certain emotional stages within his life as a secret agent.
But that, I suppose, is just what the arc of this era is all about. We witness the personal side of Bond, something that has not been presented in such magnitude before.
That does not mean, however, that he is not motivated by his duty. He actually is in all three films (and I guess it won´t be different in SPECTRE). It´s just that duty and the protection of Queen and Country are tangled up with personal demons.
- In CR, he wants to stop LeChiffre and sabotage the terrorist network, and he does, almost losing his life and the one person that loves him. The idea of quitting is already strengthened here, but it falls together with his reconvalescing. And he quickly is back on the job.
- In QOS, he actually says he is motivated by his duty. Of course, he is driven by revenge, too. But it´s not as if he were letting his job slide to pursue something else. Again, emotional stakes are coupled with his professional goals. In the end, he chooses to be professional, not killing the man who recruited Vesper but allowing him to be captured.
- In SF, he starts out on a mission that only becomes personal when M risks his life. When he goes after Silva, again he is mostly driven by his urge to prove M that he can do his job.
I suspect, SPECTRE starts out the same way, and when he discovers that he has been a puppet for Oberhauser´s strings all along there is no alternative to fight that (while also fighting a terrorist origanization threatening the whole world). But Bond must notice that he always is a pawn, for his superiors and for his foes. It´s a natural step to re-think this and to ask: is this really the life I want?
That's a pretty good analysis of the Craig era Bond films and the approach to Bond. Right from the opening scenes of CR 2006 this has been a series of films "about" James Bond as much as "James Bond films". I've posted before on the site, there is a difference.
I've just watched the snippets of the Sam Smith music video - walking in front of the Union Jack draped coffins from SF. Taken with the lyrics from the song it seems to be about Bond finally facing his demons - one in particular, Oberhauser - and having found someone - Madeleine Swann? - that he'd give it all up for, before it's too late ("the writing's on the wall").
Ironic if Bond genuinely fell in love with the daughter of the man responsible for the death of his first love, I think.