I'm not overenthusiastic about the fall, as cinematographic as it is. It seems way too high to be compatible with life, especially for someone just shot with a long range rifle. But well, it's Bond!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55845/55845d3c4ac45c740bd0f7345dc1a18a7ca0f284" alt=":)"
Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:57 PM
Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:01 PM
Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:35 PM
They probably made the fall seem longer and more exciting due to editing. It's only 300ft, which isn't too bad, considering what else Bond as done in the past. Quantum skydive for example. I mean I had no problem with it, but I know that many did. I thought it was fine, though. I can live with silliness on that level, because it complements the action and drama. Especially for Sky... fall.
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:52 PM
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:56 PM
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:00 PM
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:38 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 04:30 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:08 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:15 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:09 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:24 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:51 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:59 PM
This is obviously the scene that the journalists saw being filmed.Here is a new clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIdYDRoUIOA
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:14 PM
Edited by SolidWaffle, 15 October 2012 - 08:14 PM.
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:17 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:22 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
I don't really get the criticisms regarding Craig's hair. I think the very short cut makes him look like the Fleming sketch of the literary Bond, which has a receding hairline at the temples and short hair slicked back rather flatly. I think Craig's haircut gives him a visual toughness that is similar to that present in the Fleming sketch.
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:41 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:43 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:45 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
I thought it odd too that Bond, pointing a gun at Silva, allowed him to reach for a radio device on his jacket which Dilva's dialogue made clear was for nefarious reasons. In real life, if a terrorist up to mischief within the subway system was held at gunpoint and reaching for a radio device he'd be shot dead without hesitation. But this is a movie and would have ended too abruptly had Bond simply shot him there and then. And we wouldn't have got the cool subway crash!
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:53 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:06 PM
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:09 PM
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
I'm pretty sure the train out of service.
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:13 PM
That's quite an image. Hopefully without the suit of armour!Yeah, indeed, I feel like a more masculine version of Brienne of Tarth
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.
Yes, they've always been quite keen to limit wanton collateral damage in the Bond films. There might even be a shot shown of the driver crawling out the tube train's cab.
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
I'm pretty sure the train out of service.
Ah that would fit... I was a bit upset that an actual and successful act of terrorism could be included in a Bond film, especially one that would be really too close for comfort... It would be consistent with the habit of not having anything too "real life drama" in Bond films - which really suits me
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:21 PM
Thinking about it... Isn't it a first example of a Villain playing the traditional Bond Trick ™ on Bond himself? I mean, Silva is in Bond's power but does not panick, makes small talk, distracts him, and suddenly takes advantage when all the odds were against him. That's usually what Bond does to the Villain, not the other way round.