'Skyfall' Footage Thread
#901
Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:57 PM
I'm not overenthusiastic about the fall, as cinematographic as it is. It seems way too high to be compatible with life, especially for someone just shot with a long range rifle. But well, it's Bond!
#902
Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:01 PM
#903
Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:35 PM
They probably made the fall seem longer and more exciting due to editing. It's only 300ft, which isn't too bad, considering what else Bond as done in the past. Quantum skydive for example. I mean I had no problem with it, but I know that many did. I thought it was fine, though. I can live with silliness on that level, because it complements the action and drama. Especially for Sky... fall.
Well I DID hate the skydive-without-a-chute-and-land-like-a-flower scene from QOS
And really a 300ft fall (unconscious, head first) is not normally compatible with life, it seems experts agree with that:
http://www.greenharb...l#anchor1234543
That said, you're right: it's Bond after all, and if one man can survive this ithas to be 007
#904
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:52 PM
#905
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:56 PM
Dennis Gassner's effort with recreating MI6 is also very impressive. Looks like what I imagine the real deal's interiors to be.
#906
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:00 PM
#907
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:38 PM
And again with MI6 - I can just see that interior through the outside window almost. Great creativity and thought behind this film.
#908
Posted 15 October 2012 - 04:30 PM
* Update: Half an hour after I posted this and no thread explosion. I'm surprised.
#909
Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:08 PM
#910
Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:15 PM
#911
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:09 PM
Thinking about it... Isn't it a first example of a Villain playing the traditional Bond Trick ™ on Bond himself? I mean, Silva is in Bond's power but does not panick, makes small talk, distracts him, and suddenly takes advantage when all the odds were against him. That's usually what Bond does to the Villain, not the other way round.
#912
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:24 PM
#913
Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:51 PM
#914
Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:59 PM
This is obviously the scene that the journalists saw being filmed.Here is a new clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIdYDRoUIOA
#915
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:14 PM
Edited by SolidWaffle, 15 October 2012 - 08:14 PM.
#916
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:17 PM
The cinematopgraphy is absolutely spot on.
#917
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:22 PM
#918
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
I don't really get the criticisms regarding Craig's hair. I think the very short cut makes him look like the Fleming sketch of the literary Bond, which has a receding hairline at the temples and short hair slicked back rather flatly. I think Craig's haircut gives him a visual toughness that is similar to that present in the Fleming sketch.
It´s mainly how they made him look in the posters. If you take the Empire cover, it´s perfect
Now, if you take the posters and most of the campaign photos, he just looks like Tintin. But hey, let´s not derail the thread, I know it´s my fault, and it´s easy to get things hairy in here. Bond looks just fine on film, I agree. Now, to the clip again
Will they release a clip every day? I know it´s great but I do hope they don´t. I can´t help myself, I have to watch them all. Damn spoiler addict.
#919
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
#920
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:41 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
I agree, although, if he shot him, the film would´ve been a lot shorter They´ll probably make a "How it should have ended" animated version on youtube
#921
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:43 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
I thought it odd too that Bond, pointing a gun at Silva, allowed him to reach for a radio device on his jacket which Silva's dialogue made clear was for nefarious reasons. In real life, if a terrorist up to mischief within the subway system was held at gunpoint and reaching for a radio device he'd be shot dead without hesitation. But this is a movie and would have ended too abruptly had Bond simply shot him there and then. And we wouldn't have got the cool subway crash!
#922
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:45 PM
The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
But back to the clip: no reactions about my earlier post, and the subpar behaviour of Bond?
I thought it odd too that Bond, pointing a gun at Silva, allowed him to reach for a radio device on his jacket which Dilva's dialogue made clear was for nefarious reasons. In real life, if a terrorist up to mischief within the subway system was held at gunpoint and reaching for a radio device he'd be shot dead without hesitation. But this is a movie and would have ended too abruptly had Bond simply shot him there and then. And we wouldn't have got the cool subway crash!
Besides, curiosity killed the cat, and we all know Bond has a death wish. All cat´s are grey. Bond is curious about evil. As in the novels.
#923
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.The Craig haircut seems to be growing on hairdressers. Mine gave me the same today, without my asking for it
I agree with your point about Bond being unprofessional in failing to take his chance to shoot Silva, but I also like the other suggestion that it's a nice mirror of all those times that the villain has a chance to finish off Bond but doesn't.
#924
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.
Yeah, indeed, I feel like a more masculine version of Brienne of Tarth
#925
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:53 PM
#926
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:06 PM
The Max Zorin for the Craig era. In that clip alone, the chemistry between Bond and Silva is perfect so I can't wait to see it for longer in the film! Very chilling hearing that Tube train approach from the darkness and Bond looking on ready for impact...!
Dear me, this anticipation for the film is going to kill me!
#927
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:09 PM
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
I'm pretty sure the train out of service.
#928
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
I'm pretty sure the train out of service.
Ah that would fit... I was a bit upset that an actual and successful act of terrorism could be included in a Bond film, especially one that would be really too close for comfort... It would be consistent with the habit of not having anything too "real life drama" in Bond films - which really suits me
#929
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:13 PM
That's quite an image. Hopefully without the suit of armour!Yeah, indeed, I feel like a more masculine version of Brienne of Tarth
Haha, that's quite an extreme cut if you're not used to it.
Yes, they've always been quite keen to limit wanton collateral damage in the Bond films. There might even be a shot shown of the driver crawling out the tube train's cab.
Still, I wonder if this will be acknowledged in the film as a mistake from Bond. Will he feel responsible for the death of the people in the tube carriage? Will he feel that if he had been in a better shape, physical and psychological, this would have never happened? Or will it just be treated as collateral damage?
I'm pretty sure the train out of service.
Ah that would fit... I was a bit upset that an actual and successful act of terrorism could be included in a Bond film, especially one that would be really too close for comfort... It would be consistent with the habit of not having anything too "real life drama" in Bond films - which really suits me
#930
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:21 PM
Thinking about it... Isn't it a first example of a Villain playing the traditional Bond Trick ™ on Bond himself? I mean, Silva is in Bond's power but does not panick, makes small talk, distracts him, and suddenly takes advantage when all the odds were against him. That's usually what Bond does to the Villain, not the other way round.
Perhaps that's one of the key ideas of the film.
After all, this time it's the villains attacking Bond's lair for the climax...