As great as the 1960s Connery films were, one of their great downfalls was a lack of consistency from movie to movie. There was no planning ahead. Felix Leiter was supposed to be a series regular, but he never became a beloved sidekick because he was played by a different actor every time. Meanwhile, bit-players like M, Q, and Miss Moneypenny all became beloved - because they held on to the same actors!
Likewise, EON badly mishandled Blofeld, who should have been unquestionably the greatest Bond villain in the series. They did a good job of building up the mystery surrounding him in FRWL and Thunderball. But then, in three successive films, he is played by three different actors. What's worse, they completely botched the sequence of the films and the death of Tracy. In the novels, Blofeld emerges as a threat in Thunderball, is confronted by Bond and kills Bond's wife in OHMSS, and is hunted down and killed in YOLT. As we know, in the films, we see Blofeld's face for the first time in YOLT, but bizarrely Bond and Blofeld do not know each other in OHMSS. Then, in Diamonds are Forever, Bond makes absolutely no mention of his late wife as he pursues Blofeld. Finally, Blofeld escapes at the end of DAF, and it is not until FYEO ten years later that Blofled is killed - albeit without being identified.
Why do I recount all of that history? Because in the Daniel Craig-era reboot, EON is clearly trying to correct these errors and do it right this time. Michael G. Wilson is probably the biggest "fanboy" of all and he knows what needs to happen.
In CR, we see Bond get his "two kills," earn his 00 number, and fall in love with and then lose Vesper. QOS, although a flawed film, fleshes out the Quantum organization and makes it clear that it is a SPECTRE analogue. It is obvious that LeChiffre, Dominic Green, and Mr. White are functionaries, and there is a hidden mastermind at the top.
SkyFall completes the reboot, as we see the traditional Bond elements restored - M, Q, and Moneypenny are all back in what appears to be the Regents Park office rather than the modern MI6 building.
They have also been consistent in casting - Mr. White and Felix Leiter are portrayed by the same actors in CR and QOS, and I think we can safely assume that the actors portraying M, Q, Moneypenny, and maybe even Tanner are locked in.
As has been noted elsewhere, SkyFall is the third film and presents a "break" from the Quantum storyline - exactly as Goldfinger did after Dr. No and FRWL.
I believe (or maybe I should say I HOPE) that EON is setting up for a two-film conclusion to the Quantum story arc. Bond 24 begins with the traditional sequence of familiar scenes - flirt with Moneypenny, briefing from M, gadgets from Q - before Bond discovers a major threat to the world - perhaps bioterror - from the Quantum organization. Bond 24 would be the film in which Bond confronts the shadowy leader of Quantum - Ernst Stavro Blofeld. That would probably come late in the film, and although Bond would "save the world" and defeat Quantum, Blofeld himself would get away. This could be loosely based on elements of OHMSS - at least insofar as Blofeld's involvement and his plan.
I would humbly recommend that Bond 24 be titled "The Property of a Lady" - that is easily the best Fleming title left, and it not be difficult to make it an element of the story.
That sets up Bond 25, in which Bond hunts down Blofeld, who is disguised as "Dr. Guntram Shatterhand" and maintaining a "Garden of Death." Given that very little of the YOLT novel was actually used in the film, Bond 25 could basically use that storyline, perhaps moving it from Japan to India or another locale. The film, and perhaps the Craig era, could end with Bond killing Blofeld but losing his memory in the process. That could close the Craig era and set up for Bond's return to be the debut of a new actor.
Obviously, Bond 25 would then take the excellent title "Shatterhand."
The Craig era (QOS aside) has demonstrated that EON still knows what it is doing. I am confident that, unlike in the 1960s, they have a master plan for the Craig era. Even if Bond 24 and 25 is not a two-part story, it could easily have elements that carry over. The plan I have laid out may not be EON's plan (in fact, it probably isn't), but I am confident that they have A PLAN - and that is very promising for the Bond franchise.
Edited by tonyvenhuizen, 11 November 2012 - 06:45 PM.