#1081
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:24 PM
I'm thinking a shot of Bond and M in the DB5, The pool pic, obviously. M's and Bond in her underground bunker, one of Javier, and Ralph most likely, and probably some cool shot of Bond aiming a gun.
#1082
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:29 PM
The only thing i can say is that with Craig's new crew-cut and earpiece, he looks more like a bodyguard than Bond!
#1083
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:32 PM
Great pics!
The only thing i can say is that with Craig's new crew-cut and earpiece, he looks more like a bodyguard than Bond!
I think, these exact pics are in between shoots, as it shows his owb bg. Maybe its not Bond but Daniel, who has the earpieces - for whatever reason. 80/20 its not so, though, but you never know.
#1084
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:36 PM
We've known he's been clean-shaven for some time. After all, he did the DRAGON TATTOO press interviews without a beard.He's clean shaven in these photos.
These photos may be the official releases Page was talking about. I have no idea, because I can't see the forum threads thanks to his "no man, no problem" approach to moderation.More to the point, the empire page as disapeared and JP says there will be the "official" release of pictures very very soon.
Why should he? MI6 doesn't credit CBn when they post something, and 90% of what they post comes from here. And about half of that was originally posted by Mharkin.@Mharkin - please don't understand this as being bitchy, but would you mind crediting the pics like I did, when I posted them on MI6. Thanks
#1085
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:39 PM
#1086
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:46 PM
Why does everyone have a problem with this? Everybody demands a return to the style of the 1960s. When it is announced, everybody applauds it. When we see it in action, everybody criticises it.His trousers look a bit short in the leg.
#1087
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:48 PM
Yes, not his finest hour that something% banned idiosyncrasy. And mods and members being wrong or, more to the point, acting wrong, has always happened at some point, to be fair, in all the Bond related forums. People will be people, what can we do?These photos may be the official releases Page was talking about. I have no idea, because I can't see the forum threads thanks to his "no man, no problem" approach to moderation.
More to the point, the empire page as disapeared and JP says there will be the "official" release of pictures very very soon.
But I think the "official" pictures are still to come, except for the pool one.
Edited by univex, 15 January 2012 - 12:55 PM.
#1088
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:51 PM
#1089
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:53 PM
He makes it seem like we haven´t seen the "official" pictures yet, except for the pool one. And I reckon he´s right. These chase pictures just aren´t in the same league.Have you asked Page if these are the official photos he was talking about? And if so, has he replied yet?
#1090
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:36 PM
#1091
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:51 PM
Yes, I thought so. Do you have or have seen the "official" ones Germanlady? I know you´re quite the image detectiveThese are NOT the official photos, I can assure you of that.
#1092
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:20 PM
Erm, because Bond's trousers in the Sixties never used to look a bit short in the leg?Why does everyone have a problem with this? Everybody demands a return to the style of the 1960s. When it is announced, everybody applauds it. When we see it in action, everybody criticises it.
His trousers look a bit short in the leg.
There are a couple of posing shots of the new Bond girls in the Mail on Sunday magazine today. I'm not sure if they're official film images, or if they've just been done for the magazine, though.
#1093
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:22 PM
Erm, because Bond's trousers in the Sixties never used to look a bit short in the leg?
Why does everyone have a problem with this? Everybody demands a return to the style of the 1960s. When it is announced, everybody applauds it. When we see it in action, everybody criticises it.
His trousers look a bit short in the leg.
There are a couple of posing shots of the new Bond girls in the Mail on Sunday magazine today. I'm not sure if they're official film images, or if they've just been done for the magazine, though.
Yeah i posted a new thread about the 50th Anniversary Bond mag today, here: http://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/61097-back-to-the-bond-age/
I think those shots of the girls are just for the mag, by the looks of it: http://i57.photobuck.../DSCF3525_2.jpg (Harris)
http://i57.photobuck.../DSCF3524_2.jpg (Marlohe)
Edited by PPK_19, 15 January 2012 - 02:28 PM.
#1094
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:36 PM
#1095
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:42 PM
It may not be an official picture after all. Bond23.net reports that it's apparently been removed from the Empire site and speculates that it was leaked.
Could this be the reason why the anouncement of the first official SkyFall-pic was taken from CBn?
#1096
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:44 PM
#1097
Posted 15 January 2012 - 03:38 PM
I'm thinking a shot of Bond and M in the DB5, The pool pic, obviously. M's and Bond in her underground bunker, one of Javier, and Ralph most likely, and probably some cool shot of Bond aiming a gun.
I´d be quite happy with those. Although I think we won´t be getting one of Javier just yet and I can´t remember when was Ralph suppose to shoot his scenes. But all and all, I´d be a good show if those were the photos released, say, tomorrow (?).
#1098
Posted 15 January 2012 - 03:42 PM
#1099
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:04 PM
Like the one of Bond and Solange in the Bahamas: http://static.ddmcdn...y-gadgets-9.jpgI'm also hoping for a look at M and Bond in the Aston.
That would be nice
#1100
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:14 PM
Why should he? MI6 doesn't credit CBn when they post something, and 90% of what they post comes from here. And about half of that was originally posted by Mharkin.
Only in this case, I posted all of them on MI6, like I said in above post and credit goes to DTD. I am saying this, because there is so much energy going into complaining, who does and who does not credit. So - it either goes for all of us or for none.
In the end, its a rather childish war among borthers, as these 2 boards are so alike. Same threads, same discussions, even the same people more or less. The only open question is, who will get this or that first. Had it just been one board, the information would be the same. So like others, I do switch force and back, but its not really a necessity to have 2 IMO.
Again @Mharkin, this is not meant unfriendly in any way..
#1101
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:43 PM
#1102
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:56 PM
When official pictures are released, they're usually released on some kind of press site, which in this case is the Sony press site. They're not being send out to a chosen few, every newspaper or journalist who has to deal with movies is (or should be) registered there and has access to them. My mailbox at the office is littered every day with a number of mails from various movie companies with press site update alerts. Possible that Empire has contacts to someone in the press department, got this one early and couldn't resist publishing it. It also happens that pictures are available, but are embargoed until a certain date and time and Empire chose to ignore the embargo. I only have access to the German Sony press site, so I don't know if something is already posted on the UK or US press site (the German site often is a day or two behind these).
Just out of interest. What are they dealing with, if they ignore embargos and whatnot or publish stuff like this? Anything at all?
#1103
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:12 PM
#1104
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:29 PM
If they ignore embargoes, they usuaully get banned from attending future events.
So what?o you think, did EON plant it on them to bring it out or did they did it on their own?
#1105
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:33 PM
#1106
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:42 PM
His trousers look a bit short in the leg.
The photos captured him striding and with notably bent knees. Well measured suit trousers do ride up. If he was standing still or just not moving around so fast they'd show a perfect length. I'd rather not see Bond in a Zoot suit or some poorly fitted, baggy 80's number.
I must say the hair is particularly short. I know it won't affect the quality of the story or Craig's performance, just that I've always envisioned the classic Bond image to include at least a little length allowing the 'comma' of hair to droop down above his right eyebrow. Was always a prevalent part of Bond's look in the books and even carried through plenty of the films. Just that if they are so passionate about making this film feel more 'classic Bond' why would they practically shave all his hair down to a military crew-cut?
Special thanks to Germanlady
#1107
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:59 PM
So you expect Bond to wear the exact same clothes he did fifty years ago, then? If the style of the 1960s calls for a shorter pants leg, how is that really a problem unless the plot hinges on just how visible Bond's ankles are?Erm, because Bond's trousers in the Sixties never used to look a bit short in the leg?
#1108
Posted 15 January 2012 - 11:05 PM
His trousers look a bit short in the leg.
The photos captured him striding and with notably bent knees. Well measured suit trousers do ride up. If he was standing still or just not moving around so fast they'd show a perfect length. I'd rather not see Bond in a Zoot suit or some poorly fitted, baggy 80's number.
I must say the hair is particularly short. I know it won't affect the quality of the story or Craig's performance, just that I've always envisioned the classic Bond image to include at least a little length allowing the 'comma' of hair to droop down above his right eyebrow. Was always a prevalent part of Bond's look in the books and even carried through plenty of the films. Just that if they are so passionate about making this film feel more 'classic Bond' why would they practically shave all his hair down to a military crew-cut?
Special thanks to Germanlady
Daniel Craig is all grown up! *Whips tear from eye*
#1109
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:09 AM
#1110
Posted 16 January 2012 - 02:16 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Skyfall, photo, beard
Film Eras →
General Bond Film Discussion →
The 007th Minute: a review seriesStarted by Jim , 17 Nov 2013 Skyfall |
|
||
Film Eras →
Daniel Craig (2006 - ) →
Skyfall (2012) →
SPOILERS: Skyfall (2012) →
Shades of You Only Live Twice in Skyfall?Started by Colombo , 08 Jan 2012 Bond 23, Skyfall |
|