I don't understand why EW would have to go through NotW to confirm anything.
Because there's nothing to confirm! The tabloid made the entire story up! With EON being notoriously tight-lipped, EW's first point of call in confirming the story would be the people who "spoke" to the spokesperson first. Especially since the "source" inside EON was anonymous; EW wouldn't be able to get the name of the source otherwise. If they simply contacted EON, EON would plead ignorance. But if they knew the name of someone willing to talk, that makes them more likely to get results. But since the source doesn't actually exist, NotW simply have to put their own person in play to "confirm" the story and plead anonymity.
Do you think that the NotW has compromised this EC Forde some how?
Yes. By working with this EC Forde in the first place, they compromised EC Forde. That's what tabloids
do. They are protected by laws that limit the amount of money that can be paid out in the event of wrongdoing, which is basically a licence to write whatever the hell they want about whoever they want because if ever someone takes them to court, all the tabloids have to do is draw things out long enough that it starts costing their victim more than they could receive in remuneration.
Tabloids are notorious for doing this. Look at the production of QUNATUM OF SOLACE: while filming the scenes at Greene's party in Panama City, there was a labour union striking on the opposite side of the city. The tabloids reported this as a theft of sound equipment from the set. Then they reported that the producers had paid a group of local youths to protect their gear. Then they reported that the youths were actually from a gang, and that the set was on a rival gang's territory.
Then they reported that the gangs had gone to war with one another, interrupting production of the film with live gunfire. All of this was compeletely untrue, and caused great distress to the amily and friends of the production team - who had no idea that any of this was going on.
It's not the first time that something like this has happened. In Australia, the tabloids have gone to war more than once. When Schappelle Corby was imprisoned on drugs charges in Bali, one tabloid supported her sister Mercedes, and another tabloid supported her former friend Jody Power; Power and Mercedes Corby had a falling-out over Schappelle's arrest. The story went on for weeks as the tabloids dragged the dispute between the two women out, fishing for ratings and audiences. It happened again a year or two later; this time, there were claims that a young boy in Papua New Guinea was to be the main course for his cannibalistic tribe. One tabloid started running the story, and the other picked it up; when the other started getting higher ratings and planned a "rescue mission", the first tipped off the local authorities that they were travelling on incorrect visas and had them detained so that they could go in and steal the story back. And in the early 1990s, there was an infamous incident where a tabloid journalist fabricated an entire story claiming that fugitive businessman Christopher Skase had dozens of Majorcan police officers on his payroll and had orchestrated a series of roadblocks to retrieve tapes of his supposed wrongdoing (which were conveniently destroyed during the flight) - only for the whole thing to be demonstrated as a fraud, having taken place in Barcelona rather than Majorca, with ordinary traffic control police supposedly being the corrupt police battalion sent after the reporters. Likewise, when Fernando Alonso moved from Renault F1 to Scuderia Ferrari in 2009, the Spanish tabloids ran dozens of stories claiming that a deal had been signed months before he actually made the switch despite photographic evidence that made it impossible for him to be where and when the Spanish tabloids climed he was.
Tabloids lie. They make things up, and they don't care who they hurt. Everything they do is designed for one purpose and one purpose alone: to sells paper. And Bond is one of their favourite money-spinners. If they claim that Naomie Harris has been in talks to star in BOND 23, they get readers. If an established publication can be misled into thinking that the story is geuine, they get more readers.