Really?
I personally thought that the "We are teachers on sabbatical...and we have just won the lottery" in Quantum Of Solace was one of the funniest lines in the series.
"Hola. Somos maestros en año sabático, y nos ganamos la lotería."
Posted 12 January 2011 - 02:42 PM
Really?
I personally thought that the "We are teachers on sabbatical...and we have just won the lottery" in Quantum Of Solace was one of the funniest lines in the series.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 02:53 PM
Deadline did report that this would be a direct sequel to Quantum of Solace. I think we can be sure the organization will feature.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 02:58 PM
Good news, but here comes the grumble....
Can it be beyond the whit of EONs talents, and the millions invested in those creative talents, that, after all this time they can't anounce the damn TITLE with the press release!!!!!
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:02 PM
Good news, but here comes the grumble....
Can it be beyond the whit of EONs talents, and the millions invested in those creative talents, that, after all this time they can't anounce the damn TITLE with the press release!!!!!
Perhaps they don't have a title yet.
But be that as it may, I for one like the anticipation of a late-in-the-game title announcement. With DIE ANOTHER DAY it went down to the wire and got quite exciting. I'm happy to be kept in suspense until late summer 2012 as regards the title of BOND 23.
As for John Logan, he may have STAR TREK: NEMESIS on his CV, but consider some of his other titles: ANY GIVEN SUNDAY, GLADIATOR, THE LAST SAMURAI, THE AVIATOR, SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET.... He seems an extremely Haggis-ish choice, if you ask me.
In other words, he's a seasoned professional with a fairly versatile track record (he hasn't just written action movies or sci-fi capers) and a certain amount of critical acclaim (GLADIATOR won Best Picture), but not a household name (indeed, I had no idea who "John Logan" was until I did a Google search) or a writer with a very unique vision or style like Tarantino. To put it slightly unkindly, he seems a jobbing journeyman - a competent craftsman but not an artist. A hired gun on A-list productions. A solid and respectable choice, but hardly a brave one. Just like Haggis, really.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:07 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:07 PM
John Logan is a top writer and a very good choice for Bond, IMO. I directly know filmmakers who have worked with Logan and rate him very, very highly indeed. You don't get to work with top "A" list directors over and over again if you're just average.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:10 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:11 PM
John Logan is a top writer and a very good choice for Bond, IMO. I directly know filmmakers who have worked with Logan and rate him very, very highly indeed. You don't get to work with top "A" list directors over and over again if you're just average.
I'm not trying to diss Logan. I'm sure he's very good at what he does. All I'm trying to point out, really, is that he seems a pretty safe choice on Eon's part as opposed to a bold one, and that I see him as being very much in the same mould as Haggis.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:15 PM
He is a really good screenwriter. My only concern is that he treats this the way he treated Star Trek: Nemesis, where he essentially threw a bunch of Trek cliches into a blender and whipped up a mess. If he does this job to the best of his abilities, however, it could be really good (bearing in mind that he had to deal with a Purvis and Wade story).
John Logan is a top writer and a very good choice for Bond, IMO. I directly know filmmakers who have worked with Logan and rate him very, very highly indeed. You don't get to work with top "A" list directors over and over again if you're just average.
I'm not trying to diss Logan. I'm sure he's very good at what he does. All I'm trying to point out, really, is that he seems a pretty safe choice on Eon's part as opposed to a bold one, and that I see him as being very much in the same mould as Haggis.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:20 PM
Safe is good for Eon HQ. Not in a bad, lazily creative way either. Safe can imply a sound working ethic, compatibiity, ability to work on a team, ability to work in a producer led series of films, capable of pulling a few rabbits from the hats at the eleventh hour... availability even.I'm not trying to diss Logan. I'm sure he's very good at what he does. All I'm trying to point out, really, is that he seems a pretty safe choice on Eon's part as opposed to a bold one, and that I see him as being very much in the same mould as Haggis.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:27 PM
Safe is good for Eon HQ. Not in a bad, lazily creative way either. Safe can imply a sound working ethic, compatibiity, ability to work on a team, ability to work in a producer led series of films, capable of pulling a few rabbits from the hats at the eleventh hour... availability even.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:39 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 03:55 PM
Good to hear it's finally back on again.
Still not crazy about Mendes as director, though. While very well crafted, there's something cold and remote about his films and I'm not convinced that he can handle large scale action.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 04:01 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:07 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:10 PM
Does anyone else think this a strangely dry press release? I mean, nobody is looking forward to working with whoever, nobody is described as singularly talented etc, etc.
Just names and a date, can’t remember a Eon/MGM press release concerning this sort of stuff ever being so… well, un-florid.
Interesting.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:10 PM
Does anyone else think this a strangely dry press release? I mean, nobody is looking forward to working with whoever, nobody is described as singularly talented etc, etc.
Just names and a date, can’t remember a Eon/MGM press release concerning this sort of stuff ever being so… well, un-florid.
Interesting.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:19 PM
Does anyone else think this a strangely dry press release? I mean, nobody is looking forward to working with whoever, nobody is described as singularly talented etc, etc.
Just names and a date, can’t remember a Eon/MGM press release concerning this sort of stuff ever being so… well, un-florid.
Interesting.
I guess that´s because there is no more info yet to share.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:21 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:22 PM
So folk are disappointed there is are no inane platitudes in this press release?!
It's not a change of tone. Since when did a press release have any tone or detail?! It's meant to inform not entertain. It's hardly THIS IS YOUR LIFE.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:24 PM
So folk are disappointed there is are no inane platitudes in this press release?!
It's not a change of tone. Since when did a press release have any tone or detail?! It's meant to inform not entertain. It's hardly THIS IS YOUR LIFE.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:31 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:45 PM
So that will be why you lectured with such authority...Not taken much notice of the Bond press releases myself. Or indeed any.
It's not a change of tone. Since when did a press release have any tone or detail?! It's meant to inform not entertain.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:46 PM
I like cold and remote. Book Bond is pretty cold and remote so I can see that working well for a Bond film.Good to hear it's finally back on again.
Still not crazy about Mendes as director, though. While very well crafted, there's something cold and remote about his films and I'm not convinced that he can handle large scale action.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:50 PM
Have been mentioned in a few myself and I have penned some for others. Any sentiment expressed is just part of the spin involved and the lack of it in this instance is - to me anyway - not that interesting.So that will be why you lectured with such authority...
Not taken much notice of the Bond press releases myself. Or indeed any.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:01 PM
Woop! Let's roll.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:21 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:25 PM
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:27 PM
I remember the press release for GE because it finally nailed certainty into the end of the six year gap from '89. It felt like big news back then in the pre internet days and had quotes from Cubby Broccoli amongst others, plus a brief biography on Brosnan. Happy to upload it if anyone's interested.
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:29 PM