140 million, give or take.
You think it will have a multiplier of... 2???
Again, as I've said before, if even critically panned movies with bigger openings routinely muster multipliers of 2.5 to 3, there's no reason to think QoS won't as well. Remember, DAD had a multiplier of 3.4 with worse reviews and a similar (when adjusted for inflation) opening weekend.
I wonder - if folk put their energies into being so evidently expert about their own finances as they patently are about those of some film companies, would the credit crunch have happened?
They probably would. Luckily I can do both.
For me, talking box office numbers is like discussing sports stats (which I also like to do). I prefer watching films or sports, respectively, but sometimes I like to scratch that mathematical part of my brain as well.
All I know is that I love this film and lots of my friends - who all liked CR - keep asking me questions like, "was that guy in the trunk supposed to be someone from Casino Royale?" "Wasn't M shot in that one scene?" "How did Bond get out of that burning building?"
Those are the same people who would lean over to ask me if Gettler was Le Chiffre.
The Friday drop is not terribly good. Madagascar 2 did $63.1 opening weekend and did $8 mil on its second Friday. But at least QoS isn't dropping like High School Musical 3!
I don't see why you keep comparing it to Madagascar. Wouldn't something within its genre be a better comparison?
Okay so the film is doing fine but... that second weekend is dropoff is much steeper than CR's. QOS is declining faster.
CR opened relatively weakly and it rolled directly into Thanksgiving. QoS had an opening over 65% better and Thanksgiving is a week later for it. Apples and oranges. That's like comparing day X of CR to day X of DAD, when it was some random day for the former and New Year's for the latter.
And again, CR has a much better multiplier than TDK (4.1 versus 3.3). Heck, it has the same RottenTomatoes score. Would you say it had better word-of-mouth? Was better critically received? Probably not, it's just that TDK is "falling" from unprecedented heights.
Do we agree that word of mouth for this film isn't great?
Yes, but it's still good, in my experience. Basically, "good, but not as great as CR" is the consensus I've encountered. Then again, the consensus I encountered after CR was "good, but not as great as Goldeneye"... which is all you really need to know.
Can't help thinking it'll end up taking about $560 worldwide. Hope I'm wrong.
Well, I doubt that, but even if that's the case, no big deal. TND underperformed GE by a similar margin (and had much worse reviews), yet Brosnan was never doubted as a serious box office heavyweight for the series.