Surely it would be more realistic for Craig's Bond to be able to tackle a villain's lair, with a larger force, than by himself or a small group of men.
If the villain is also realistic, then the scale of his "lair" will not call for a large force. Like tdalton said, more spy-like an approach.
I don't want the villain/s to be realistic. Fleming's rarely were, and neither were the 60s villains, why should they be now?
Yes, I want too relatively large opposing forces. No CGI.
And I for one always found the "hundreds of random guys battle each other" climaxes to be extremely boring. I was more interested in what Bond, his allies, the villain, and the villain's henchmen were up to. Cutting away a few times to show there's an ongoing massive battle is fine, but paying any attention to it loses me as much as random explosions do.
I never thought that, if anything the exact opposite. The climax to TB and OHMSS are two of my favourite action sequences from the history of Bond, and are amazing pieces of larger than life, but brutal spectacle.
Also, what is the "theme" of Craig's era, and how does it differ to Connery's? I don't get this. Bond films are malleable as far as I'm concerned.
You said it yourself, darker and more realistic (and more focused on Bond the human being).
To be frank, TB's epic underwater battle at the end, is more realistic in my opinion than Bond fighting to the death in an embarrassing CGI sinking house, or fighting Medrano's private army and fighting Greene in QoS.
Having a Splinter Cell-esque climax, would take a lot of the potential fun away from the situation, and I don't mean camp. I just mean something less dour.
Remember how in TSWLM Bond and the captured submarine crews fought and worked their way into the control room of Stromberg's super-sub? That was a surprisingly small, intimate scale for the film, especially when you look back in light of its reputation. They scrapped and clawed and used their brains to save the day. That's how I'd like the powers that be to approach this idea in one of Craig's films.
Remember when the the US marines in Thunderball brutally fought they through the SPECTRE contingent, cutting throats, breathing tubes, skewering arms with harpoons, while Largo's frogmen fought back comparable strength?
That's how I'd like power that be to approach the following climaxes to Craig's films. You drop the fantastical, larger than life element in that kind of scenario, and it becomes terribly dour and boring.
I'm frankly sick of these preposterously video-gamey "Bond fights villain, while Bond girl fights secondary villain" showdowns we've been having recently. Bring back the Special Forces I say, large scale combat is the way to go.
Although the infiltration of Greene's base wasn't an example of Bond "spying" per se, it was an example of him being a secret agent and precision instrument. It's not just about him being quiet or sneaky, but about being unexpected, methodical, and surgical in his approach to taking out enemies. That was on full display in QOS, which is what makes it one of my favorite such finales in Bond film history.
It's personally one of my least favourite finales in Bondian lore, down in the Stygian depths with the Brosnan climaxes. There was hardly anything methodical about it, with Bond just going running around, scoring points, gunning down guards. Any calcution or surgical precision in it, was lost in the shoddy, fractured editing, to the point of incomprehension.
It felt practically antithetical to Fleming. Yes his Bond was a cold, blunt instrument, BUT not a Duracell-powered sonic the hedgehog figure, with pin-point precise accuracy along with boundless speed and stamina. Fleming's Bond was far more human, and flawed figure, with physical limits.
I just feel like what you guys are suggesting would amount to nothing more than extra bodies on both sides. It certainly wouldn't heighten the tension for me - if anything, it would probably suck a lot of the excitement and cool factor out of it.
How cooler can you get than the classic finales to TB, OHMSS and TLD?