But then, I also think people who talk in cinemas should be chemically castrated...

Posted 19 September 2008 - 12:10 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 12:10 PM
I mean, for Christ's sake, McFly could've done a better job!!!
Wash your mouth out with soap!
Posted 19 September 2008 - 12:29 PM
I don't think people should be allowed to post their opinion until they've heard the song at least half a dozen times.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 12:44 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 12:57 PM
Edited by Sanchez, 19 September 2008 - 12:57 PM.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:06 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:11 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:12 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:13 PM
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Take off the rose-tinted glasses and look at it as you would any piece of music (as the generral public will) and you'll see just how bad it actually is.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:33 PM
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:41 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 01:43 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:18 PM
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Take off the rose-tinted glasses and look at it as you would any piece of music (as the generral public will) and you'll see just how bad it actually is.
Please don't make assumptions about my mental state.![]()
People have every right to like the song without needing their head checked. Don't post such nonsense.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:23 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:26 PM
Heard Another Way To Die being previewed on the radio as I was driving into work this morning...it got a great reception from the DJ's..both thought it was cool.. One funny comment they made about it, and I don't think it was being intended as a negative comment, was that one of DJ's said the song sounded like a "stripper song"!!
![]()
But still though, both were generally excited for the song..so thats a good thing..
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:30 PM
Sometimes it is, but I don't think YKMN is bland at all. Generic and bland are two entirely different terms.Modern day generic rock is bland, that's what I am saying.
Uh, no. I said I don't know what I'd think, but I'm sure I'd call some of them dated. Or do you really think I would call every Bond song from FRWL to LTK "fresh" and "modern" had I been around as a Bond fan?Not grade school antics, I could be speaking in the obnoxious internet slang. I think you have a warped sense of taste in music because you declared the older Bond songs dated when they came out or close to it.
When the heck did I say the mainstream won't listen to it? I said it's not what the mainstream is already listening to. Yes, I'm sure Jack White fans and other niches are already listening to similar music, but this isn't what "Now That's What I Call Music" audiences are listening to nowadays. Unless you can point to the top songs of the day that you think this is like, I just don't hear it.Then you say ATWD is something that the mainstream won't listen to and isn't dated when it clearly is just a knee-jerk "flavour of the month" song.
Huh? I said different from what's being played on the radio. Again, what hit songs of the moment are like this?This song is a result of the coporation of two popular artists of the time and they simply put the two sounds together and steal some cues from some older Bond songs and you call that "different".
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:31 PM
Heard Another Way To Die being previewed on the radio as I was driving into work this morning...it got a great reception from the DJ's..both thought it was cool.. One funny comment they made about it, and I don't think it was being intended as a negative comment, was that one of DJ's said the song sounded like a "stripper song"!!
![]()
But still though, both were generally excited for the song..so thats a good thing..
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:31 PM
More like cheap and nasty.It does have a kind of raw, dirty vibe.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:35 PM
My dog hates it.I didn't yet hear the song on my preferred radio channel. It was either news related, or I missed the song. But both the DJ's mentioned they liked the new bond theme 'Another Way To Die'. That's all I heard. So, it's not unlike everybody, their family, their dogs and cats hate it. There might be a few "non-BondFans" who actually like the song.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:44 PM
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
I think you're bang on target. It would explain why those of us who say we are ambivalent or undecided about the song are being treated just as harshly as the haters by those who profess to love it. Their defensiveness really is very, very silly because it ain't going to convince the doubters in the general population, who seem to be to be in the vast majority with regards to this song.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:51 PM
I really like the swampy bravado of it. It's got silly, very over-the-top lyrics that sound more like they're from an Austin Powers or Spy Hard-style parody than from a Bond film proper, but there is some disarming substance to them, and the title - awful as it sounded - does make a kind of sense with Craig's portrayal of the character and what we saw in Casino Royale. I like the double vocal effect, and I like the edginess of some of it - I enjoyed that spurting frayed non-guitar solo.
The thing that I didn't like at all was the drop-ins of little trills that recall 'Bond themes' very heavy-handedly. The song itself is fine - stick to it! I hate all that pandering to 'sounding like Bond'. It's the aural equivalent of a piece of fan fiction that has James Bond, with a cruel smile and a comma of black hair, wearing a midnight blue, Brioni one-button, single breasted wool barathea tuxedo with peaked silk grosgrain lapels that perfectly conceals his Walther PPK, ordering a vodka martini - shaken not stirred - while flirting in a casino with a woman called Jessica Lovescock. While humming an old Ink Spots tune. It's like an old Casio keyboard where instead of pressing a button that gives you a naff 'hip-hop' style 'Yo!', you get a bombastic Bond riff, or tinkly Bassey-theme-ish piano, or horn sound. Terrible.
The rest of the song is fine. I just wish they'd get rid of this sort of thing. That's what I liked about Chris Cornell's song, minus a couple of dodgy moments: it was a Bond song, but not extremely predictably and obviously trying to be that. It fitted the spirit of the new direction: no Moneypenny or Q if they're not necessary. No horns if you don't need them. You can be Bond without the obvious. This so nearly did that, but someone - White, I suppose - has gone over it all and sprinkled 'Bond' stuff over it. Only it's not Bond stuff, it's Jessica Lovescock video-game soundtrack Casio keyboard MIDI file by-numbers Bond stuff that the song does not need.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:55 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 02:58 PM
Pretend it's "ringer." Who knows, it probably is anyway.Anyhow, decent song. Just hope they don't use any more words like "blinger." Rhymes with "unimaginative singer."
You forgot to tell me to get my skateboard off your lawn.No one with a wider range of music taste would love this garbage.
Damn that hippity-hop and the frikkin MTV!
100% agreed. I don't need to get deep into technical terms or buzzwords, I just go by what I like. I always thought that was the whole point of music.Just to respond to what was said in the other locked thread..
As a song is all I care about. I couldn't care less which is more liked in 20 years time, I could be dead by then. And 'pop' and 'fluff' are two words which couldn't be further from accurately describing White or Another Way to Die.
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Take off the rose-tinted glasses and look at it as you would any piece of music (as the generral public will) and you'll see just how bad it actually is. It's similar to the phenomenon we saw in 2002 and 2003 with all the people talking up Die Another Day after first seeing it and then voila, six months later they think it's terrible.
Even more than politics and religion.This thread just goes to show that nothing is more polarizing than music
I think you mean:Objectively, though, I'd have to declare it the very worst Eon Bond song ever, with the possible exception of "The Experience of Lovers" or whatever it is that closes GOLDENEYE.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 03:14 PM
Nothing like arguing that people are fooling themselves just to justify your own point. Because no-one could possibly see something different from you.I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 03:14 PM
Its too bad that so many people will bitch and complain about the song without taking into account that Another Way To Die is supposed to be different than what we've been used to in the past. Frankly, I'm really starting to love the song and am glad we didn't get another generic theme tune in the style of Tomorrow Never Dies or The World Is Not Enough.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 03:16 PM
Posted 19 September 2008 - 03:55 PM
Just like with movies, the first experience will tell you exactly how good it is. After that, your mind will be clouded.I don't think people should be allowed to post their opinion until they've heard the song at least half a dozen times.
But then, I also think people who talk in cinemas should be chemically castrated...
Posted 19 September 2008 - 04:14 PM
I think the people that say they love it are in denial. Their whole point is part of talking up the movie (which looks fantastic) and that's coloring their view of this completely naff piece of music.
Take off the rose-tinted glasses and look at it as you would any piece of music (as the generral public will) and you'll see just how bad it actually is. It's similar to the phenomenon we saw in 2002 and 2003 with all the people talking up Die Another Day after first seeing it and then voila, six months later they think it's terrible.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 04:18 PM
Not really. Some movies/songs/etc. are "good" (or "bad") by virtue of their shock value, immediate impression, etc. Some get better when you see it or listen to it enough times that you start appreciating the nuances. And there are a number of other types. But I think it's a mistake to say that your first experience is the most (or even only) reliable, "objective" one.Just like with movies, the first experience will tell you exactly how good it is. After that, your mind will be clouded.
Posted 19 September 2008 - 04:23 PM
Not really. Some movies/songs/etc. are "good" (or "bad") by virtue of their shock value, immediate impression, etc. Some get better when you see it or listen to it enough times that you start appreciating the nuances. And there are a number of other types. But I think it's a mistake to say that your first experience is the most (or even only) reliable, "objective" one.Just like with movies, the first experience will tell you exactly how good it is. After that, your mind will be clouded.