Daniel Craig on Letterman show - 10 November
#121
Posted 11 November 2006 - 03:35 PM
#122
Posted 11 November 2006 - 04:14 PM
#123
Posted 11 November 2006 - 04:31 PM
God, I absolutely hate these talk shows (Leno, Letterman, Conan). I find the entire format just so stale and old fashioned, I can't believe they still exist. And the participants so clearly phone it inCraig was just on.
Pretty crappy interview except for the clip.
They talked about Road to Perdition, Letterman showed photos of all the Bonds, and then they showed some clip of monkeys skiing to the James Bond theme.
#124
Posted 11 November 2006 - 04:35 PM
#125
Posted 11 November 2006 - 04:56 PM
God, I absolutely hate these talk shows (Leno, Letterman, Conan). I find the entire format just so stale and old fashioned, I can't believe they still exist. And the participants so clearly phone it in
Edited by Jackanaples, 11 November 2006 - 04:58 PM.
#126
Posted 11 November 2006 - 05:15 PM
No monkey clips for Pierce, though.
#127
Posted 11 November 2006 - 05:34 PM
#128
Posted 11 November 2006 - 05:54 PM
Put simply: our hosts play it far too safe and entertaining conversation cannot survive in the vacuum created.
Talking of playing it safe: I watched an online clip from some show in Cleveland with a brief interview with Craig, they showed bits from the trailer and when the train part appeared they bleeped out the word ''! Someone really needs to loosen up over there.
EDIT: Oh my God. The board beeps it out too. I can't believe it. It's the part of Bond Vesper says she's keeping her eyes off.
For heaven's sake, you can say that word daytime on the BBC. This is ridiculous.
#129
Posted 11 November 2006 - 09:06 PM
Letterman was a jerk. He basically made fun of Craig in the dialogue and had him as the second guest after some old lady from a documentary that no one heard of. He spent more time talking about Paul Newman and Tom Hanks in Road To Perdition than he did about CR.
Or could it be true that King Craig does really not have any clothes on? I wonder how Hugh Jackman or Clive Owenwould have been welcomed on late night shows after doing a Bond flick..
#130
Posted 11 November 2006 - 09:30 PM
Letterman was a jerk. He basically made fun of Craig in the dialogue and had him as the second guest after some old lady from a documentary that no one heard of. He spent more time talking about Paul Newman and Tom Hanks in Road To Perdition than he did about CR.
Or could it be true that King Craig does really not have any clothes on? I wonder how Hugh Jackman or Clive Owenwould have been welcomed on late night shows after doing a Bond flick..
Yes, because Letterman is such a huge Bond fan, and he intentionally blew the interview becuase he wanted to "stick" it to Craig.
#131
Posted 11 November 2006 - 11:01 PM
#132
Posted 11 November 2006 - 11:08 PM
Letterman was a jerk. He basically made fun of Craig in the dialogue and had him as the second guest after some old lady from a documentary that no one heard of. He spent more time talking about Paul Newman and Tom Hanks in Road To Perdition than he did about CR.
Or could it be true that King Craig does really not have any clothes on? I wonder how Hugh Jackman or Clive Owenwould have been welcomed on late night shows after doing a Bond flick..
By Dave? Probably the exact same as DC. Standard format. Or could it be that it was just Letterman being, you know, Dave? He makes bad jokes, he beats jokes to death, he shows stupid clips. That's his 'thing'. Still better than Leno
At least he didn't do what he used (still does? Haven't watched him in an age) to do with Survivor rejects. They're mandated to be on the show by CBS. Dave obviously hates this and frequently doesn't even let them sit down.
#133
Posted 12 November 2006 - 01:20 AM
#134
Posted 12 November 2006 - 01:25 AM
C'est la vie, I guess. I miss Johnny.
#135
Posted 12 November 2006 - 03:19 AM
Includes a scene from Casino Royale
#136
Posted 12 November 2006 - 03:33 AM
God, I absolutely hate these talk shows (Leno, Letterman, Conan). I find the entire format just so stale and old fashioned, I can't believe they still exist. And the participants so clearly phone it in…seriously, I feel embarrassed for all involved. I literally squirm when I watch these.
I just find it hard to believe that people tune into it every night. Both Letterman and Leno feel very antiquated IMHO. Conan still feels fresh, but if you watch him enough it gets tiring. I think Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert would best them all if they were on one of the big 4 instead of Comedy Central. Granted they only do a half hour...I would have rather had seen Craig on one of those. The interview length would have been about the same.
what was with lettermans lame jokes, which, everyone, seemed to find funny
Letterman has a really dry sense of humor. If that's your comedy taste then Letterman is a funny guy; if it isn't then you're going to wonder why he's considered a comedian. That's just how it is - there's hardly any middle ground.
#137
Posted 12 November 2006 - 04:10 AM
For those of you who don't know who Dick Cavett is, he had a show in the late 60s and 70s that was probably one of the most articulate shows ever. He had musicians, actors, authors, politicians, and generally interesting people as his guests, and often gave them very long interviews. He didn't do comedy per se (i.e. no real opening monologue), though he is a very funny guy, and the focus was always on his guests. His most famous episode was broadcast during Woodstock, and his guests were Jefferson Airplane, CSN and Joni Mitchell. One of his guests also died on his show (of a heart attack, I think).
Recently, the show was revived for one episode with Mel Brooks as the guest.
He should do one with Craig.
#138
Posted 12 November 2006 - 04:20 AM
[quote name='zencat' post='644557' date='11 November 2006 - 10:31']
God, I absolutely hate these talk shows (Leno, Letterman, Conan). I find the entire format just so stale and old fashioned, I can't believe they still exist. And the participants so clearly phone it in
#139
Posted 12 November 2006 - 04:30 AM
Yet another "let's show a clip of Bush saying something stupid!"
LOL. Well you have to admit the man says a lot of stupid stuff. He's not a good public speaker -- all politics aside.
Yeah, anyway. I'm not defending the interview. It was weak, but I wasn't expecting a whole lot to tell you the truth. I'm not upset.
On a related note, I noticed Letterman looked like he was sick and I recall reading someone saying Craig canceled an interview elsewhere because he picked up something while in NY. I wonder...
#140
Posted 12 November 2006 - 05:21 AM
#141
Posted 12 November 2006 - 05:47 AM
#142
Posted 12 November 2006 - 06:36 AM
#143
Posted 12 November 2006 - 07:57 AM
The second spot is not more coveted (certainly not on late night talk shows anyway)--the first one is. When was the last time a major star like Tom Cruise or Nicole Kidman or Tom Hanks came on after someone like the painting lady or Rob Schneider or even Eva Longoria? They don't. They come on first because it's the prime spot. (That, and because nowadays the stars don't often stick around once their bit is done.)Guys the Second spot is more coveted. You want people to watch the whole show so you put the crazy painting person on first so that people have to wait to see the new james bond. I think Letterman did a fine job i mean it was a 5 minute interview what do you want?
As for the Letterman interview, I haven't seen it, but it does sound disappointing. I've never been a big fan of Letterman. I much prefer Leno and since he is a big Bond fan (and has the top-rated late-night show), it is weird that Craig wasn't on The Tonight Show first.
#144
Posted 12 November 2006 - 08:17 AM
#145
Posted 12 November 2006 - 08:22 AM
The second spot is not more coveted (certainly not on late night talk shows anyway)--the first one is. When was the last time a major star like Tom Cruise or Nicole Kidman or Tom Hanks came on after someone like the painting lady or Rob Schneider or even Eva Longoria? They don't. They come on first because it's the prime spot. (That, and because nowadays the stars don't often stick around once their bit is done.)
As for the Letterman interview, I haven't seen it, but it does sound disappointing. I've never been a big fan of Letterman. I much prefer Leno and since he is a big Bond fan (and has the top-rated late-night show), it is weird that Craig wasn't on The Tonight Show first.
Well your right but in this case it obviously made sense to have Craig go second. If he didn't who would have watched the rest of the show?
#146
Posted 12 November 2006 - 08:23 AM
#147
Posted 12 November 2006 - 12:07 PM
Letterman has a really dry sense of humor. If that's your comedy taste then Letterman is a funny guy; if it isn't then you're going to wonder why he's considered a comedian. That's just how it is - there's hardly any middle ground.
I like dry humour, I got his jokes: they're just never funny.
#148
Posted 12 November 2006 - 02:47 PM
The scene with the monkies looks great as well.
#149
Posted 12 November 2006 - 05:22 PM
#150
Posted 12 November 2006 - 05:48 PM
As for the Daniel Craig interview, they all can't be huge and funny. Not every guest can be Steve Martin or Tom Hanks. And hey, at least they're phasing out "Will it Float?"