Edited by Stax, 13 November 2006 - 12:24 AM.
Daniel Craig on Letterman show - 10 November
#151
Posted 13 November 2006 - 12:22 AM
#152
Posted 13 November 2006 - 01:16 AM
darthbond
Edited by darthbond, 13 November 2006 - 01:21 AM.
#153
Posted 13 November 2006 - 01:35 AM
Sweet Jesus! Am I drunk??....the clip they played was quite good, and Craig and Green were very good in it. Such a relief to see some real action, and not CGI-imposed free fall scenes, wave-surfing scenes, or disintegrating airplane scenes.
#154
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:12 AM
he needs to sharpen up his talk show personality !!!
#155
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:23 AM
he seemed totally humorless on letterman. i didnt expect him to be funny but i wud have expected a harrison ford sort of dry humor.
he needs to sharpen up his talk show personality !!!
Eh? He was there to plug his James Bond movie, its not a standup comedy performance. An interviewee can only be as good as the interviewer lets him be; the interviewer in this case was going through the motions as routinely as possible so he could get to his Alex Trebek gag and monkey clip.
#156
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:43 AM
#157
Posted 13 November 2006 - 11:01 AM
Really? I thought he looked very stiff and uncomfortable. And though I'm not one to care much about fashion, the outfit he put on was a definite FASHION-DON'T. The suit itself would've looked hideous AS IS, but then he puts jeans on with it? His stylist should be burned in effigy.
Yes, I don't think he looked very relaxed, but I thought his outfit was pretty good, actually. And the suit looks great without jeans too; what's wrong with it?
#158
Posted 13 November 2006 - 12:58 PM
Really? I thought he looked very stiff and uncomfortable. And though I'm not one to care much about fashion, the outfit he put on was a definite FASHION-DON'T. The suit itself would've looked hideous AS IS, but then he puts jeans on with it? His stylist should be burned in effigy.
Yes, I don't think he looked very relaxed, but I thought his outfit was pretty good, actually. And the suit looks great without jeans too; what's wrong with it?
The thing that stood out to me, was Craig being very fidgety. It's like he could not stand still.
At one point, i thought he took a ring off his finger and was fidgeting with it.
#159
Posted 13 November 2006 - 01:07 PM
I've noticed this before. Craig is very nervous when it comes to the press and chat shows. He's a good actor, so does his best to appear relaxed, but he think he is very nervous.The thing that stood out to me, was Craig being very fidgety. It's like he could not stand still.
At one point, i thought he took a ring off his finger and was fidgeting with it.
#160
Posted 13 November 2006 - 01:08 PM
#161
Posted 13 November 2006 - 01:43 PM
#162
Posted 13 November 2006 - 03:39 PM
I love Letterman but that monkey skit was in poor taste. Craig's feeling awkward enough with the press and the criticism over his casting so poking fun probably isn't the smartest thing to do. Still, Craig didn't do himself any service by appearing so stiff. He was much more affable when I interviewed him. I wonder if Letterman even shook hands and broke the ice with him before he walked out? Those 10 seconds make a difference, believe it or not.
I was pissed by that monkey stuff too. Not funny at all, Dave.
#163
Posted 13 November 2006 - 03:48 PM
I love Letterman but that monkey skit was in poor taste. Craig's feeling awkward enough with the press and the criticism over his casting so poking fun probably isn't the smartest thing to do. Still, Craig didn't do himself any service by appearing so stiff. He was much more affable when I interviewed him. I wonder if Letterman even shook hands and broke the ice with him before he walked out? Those 10 seconds make a difference, believe it or not.
I was pissed by that monkey stuff too. Not funny at all, Dave.
No Sensayuma.
#164
Posted 13 November 2006 - 06:06 PM
As for Craig's look....the man is a chameleon. He can look very good one minute, and then completely haggard the next. For that appearance on Letterman, he did himself no favors. Most people couldn't have pulled off that "mix-and-match" look and Craig was no exception. Only the most beautiful of people can wear trash and still make it look good (Halle Bery could wear a homeless man's soiled flannel shirt and underwear and still look sexy), but Craig isn't one of those people. He needs to step up his game.
I'm not sure you've been following fashion very closely. Craig can pull off most looks and pretty well-regarded as one of the more stylish fellas around.
The tie was not completley tightened, so it made him appear to be uncomfortable to the point where it had to be loosened some. He had a on a jacket and a vest (I believe), and a loose-fitting tie with a dissheveled handkerchief. The suit was too "busy-looking", and the jeans just made it worse. It was an eye-sore, and I bet if you look through style magazines next week, you'll find his ensemble listed as "What Were They Thinking?". Just a wretched combo all around.
Amusingly, he wore the same outift a few weeks ago and someone found a link to a style website where they praised his look. I'll try and find the link. It's quite fashionable and I think he looked pretty stylish.
#165
Posted 13 November 2006 - 06:38 PM
Doubt a Letterman appearance sharp or flat weighs much in the balance, that he was on the show is more to the point IMO. Robert Redford is one of the worst interviews in Hollywood, has been for over 30 years...doesn't seem to have hurt his films any.
The film will sell the film, or not. PR is for awareness, and it's out there so that's good.
#166
Posted 13 November 2006 - 09:08 PM
Craig as Craig is not the selling point here, but Craig as Bond. And there's a long history of non-charming stars that back that up, just as there's a long series of oozily charming actors that've also made good. Just don't see how a boring Craig on Letterman equals a PR disaster...but whatever. This sounds more like Craig isn't Brosnan so he can't be successful as Bond again, which is proving to be--at least to the critics--absolutely false. Will it matter at the box office? Check back next week...
#167
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:09 PM
#168
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:50 PM
Amusingly, he wore the same outift a few weeks ago and someone found a link to a style website where they praised his look. I'll try and find the link. It's quite fashionable and I think he looked pretty stylish.
Okay, I think we're sort of getting into a weird area here. I really dont' want to fight about whose favorite Bond was/is the more stylish dresser. Let's agree that Lazenby looked silly in that kilt and leave it at that.
Well, as they say in playground- you started it. I'm fine with people not liking some point of CR, but when they hate every single aspect (as most of the miseries on AJB do- Eva's evil, Campbell's Satan, Craig is incapable of acting/promotion/wearing clothes etc.) it becomes hard to swallow them as real opinions.
If a promotional appearance can help sell a film, it can also help hurt it. Not saying people won't go see the film because he wore the top half of a suit with ratty jeans, but.....why take that risk?
You genuinely don't get the concept behind fashion, do you?
#169
Posted 13 November 2006 - 10:54 PM
Amusingly, he wore the same outift a few weeks ago and someone found a link to a style website where they praised his look. I'll try and find the link. It's quite fashionable and I think he looked pretty stylish.
Okay, I think we're sort of getting into a weird area here. I really dont' want to fight about whose favorite Bond was/is the more stylish dresser. Let's agree that Lazenby looked silly in that kilt and leave it at that.
Well, as they say in playground- you started it. I'm fine with people not liking some point of CR, but when they hate every single aspect (as most of the miseries on AJB do- Eva's evil, Campbell's Satan, Craig is incapable of acting/promotion/wearing clothes etc.) it becomes hard to swallow them as real opinions.If a promotional appearance can help sell a film, it can also help hurt it. Not saying people won't go see the film because he wore the top half of a suit with ratty jeans, but.....why take that risk?
You genuinely don't get the concept behind fashion, do you?
How nice. A Craig fight, that has nothing to do with Brosnan.
#170
Posted 13 November 2006 - 11:19 PM
As for the interview, it was a little awkward. I think leno would have been a better show to do, even though it is pretty bad.
#171
Posted 13 November 2006 - 11:46 PM
Craig is still an unknown commodity for the general public, although he hasn't punched anybody nor insulted all women on the planet yet...give him time, maybe? Dull in one interview is a far cry from the histionics of a Crowe or a Cruise, IMO.
#172
Posted 13 November 2006 - 11:53 PM
Why did you not find it funny. I thought it was hilariously set up. With Craig giving a description of what were about to see then it's a bunch of monkeys! Sorry i thought it was funny!
I love Letterman but that monkey skit was in poor taste. Craig's feeling awkward enough with the press and the criticism over his casting so poking fun probably isn't the smartest thing to do. Still, Craig didn't do himself any service by appearing so stiff. He was much more affable when I interviewed him. I wonder if Letterman even shook hands and broke the ice with him before he walked out? Those 10 seconds make a difference, believe it or not.
I was pissed by that monkey stuff too. Not funny at all, Dave.
#173
Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:28 AM
#174
Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:44 PM
I love Letterman but that monkey skit was in poor taste. Craig's feeling awkward enough with the press and the criticism over his casting so poking fun probably isn't the smartest thing to do. Still, Craig didn't do himself any service by appearing so stiff. He was much more affable when I interviewed him. I wonder if Letterman even shook hands and broke the ice with him before he walked out? Those 10 seconds make a difference, believe it or not.
I was pissed by that monkey stuff too. Not funny at all, Dave.
Yeah, it was very insulting. DC seemed nervous, then again Letterman didn't exactly make him feel very welcome. Hopefully next time, he'll do Conan, who I love plus Jimmy Kimmel and Craig Ferguson.
Letterman's just a crotchedy old man now, a shell of his former self who can't accept anything new.
#175
Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:53 PM
#176
Posted 07 January 2007 - 07:54 PM
Apparently Daniel wasn't too popular with the crowds outside the Ed Sullivan theatre as there were people shouting "You're no Sean Connery" and "Don't come back (to America)" as he entered and left. It may have had something to do with the fact that he didn't sign autographs or acknowledge anyone waiting outside to see him.
Its well known that most of the people hanging outside those shows are just trying to get celebrity autographs so they can put them straight on ebay; they don't care who the celebrity is, as long as they get the ink. So if he was jeered - yes, how dare Daniel not allow lazy jobless geeks to profit from his name, shame on him!
#177
Posted 07 January 2007 - 07:59 PM
Yeah, it was very insulting. DC seemed nervous, then again Letterman didn't exactly make him feel very welcome. Hopefully next time, he'll do Conan, who I love plus Jimmy Kimmel and Craig Ferguson.
Letterman's just a crotchedy old man now, a shell of his former self who can't accept anything new.
Yeah, if you watch some older Letterman interviews on youtube, you can see he is much more enthusiastic in general; these days its all about getting the cheap laugh, he only really switches on when he has one of his friends on like Charles Grodin or Al Franken or someone like that. Ferguson and Kimmel are much more enthusiastic about anyone they're talking to, probably because they're still relatively new. Still, the Charlie Rose show was great, and the Regis & Kelly was OK, considering it was Regis & Kelly
#178
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:13 PM
Yeah, it was very insulting. DC seemed nervous, then again Letterman didn't exactly make him feel very welcome. Hopefully next time, he'll do Conan, who I love plus Jimmy Kimmel and Craig Ferguson.
Letterman's just a crotchedy old man now, a shell of his former self who can't accept anything new.
Yeah, if you watch some older Letterman interviews on youtube, you can see he is much more enthusiastic in general; these days its all about getting the cheap laugh, he only really switches on when he has one of his friends on like Charles Grodin or Al Franken or someone like that. Ferguson and Kimmel are much more enthusiastic about anyone they're talking to, probably because they're still relatively new. Still, the Charlie Rose show was great, and the Regis & Kelly was OK, considering it was Regis & Kelly
I saw that DC interview with Letterman, and also an earlier one with Brosnan and
Letterman.
Lettermans attitude to Craig was decidely less friendly than it was to Brosnan.
I couldn't believe it when Letterman showed the chimps skiing scene.
I believe Craig handled that quite well, when he replied 'that was one of my
earlier films' but he did look uneasy.
My sum up was that Letterman was taking the 'piss' out of Craig.
If Craig goes on that show for Bond 22, i hope Letterman's attitude has changed.
#179
Posted 08 January 2007 - 04:35 AM
#180
Posted 08 January 2007 - 05:27 AM
lafemme