Skyfall Tabloid Trash Bin
#61
Posted 16 February 2010 - 03:44 AM
Risico has grown on me. Like hair on a Chia pet.
Funny thing that isn't it?
#62
Posted 16 February 2010 - 04:32 AM
Risicoians RULE!!!!
The real clue is the "ian" in Risicoian.
#63
Posted 16 February 2010 - 05:45 AM
If it does come down to these two titles, put me down for Risico as well.
Me too. It has an element of risk to it.
#64
Posted 16 February 2010 - 07:08 AM
#65
Posted 16 February 2010 - 10:47 AM
I'm leaning more towards Risico at the minute, though.
#66
Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:15 PM
I do think The Property of a lady is quite classy and sophisticated though so I'd be happy if this got choosen
#67
Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:26 PM
Do i beleive it.. Hell no but am i glad we finnaly got a bloody title rumour and 2 to be exact YES....
How have we got a title rumour? Fans on this and other Bond sites have been discussing which title they prefer. The Star is reporting on this thread http://debrief.comma...showtopic=44870 (or another like it here or at MI6 - I can't be bothered to look) and we have finally got a title rumour?
Um... not really.
#68
Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:38 PM
Did u read the article the star is saying bond 23 will ether be Risico or the property of a lady because of our discussions.Do i beleive it.. Hell no but am i glad we finnaly got a bloody title rumour and 2 to be exact YES....
How have we got a title rumour? Fans on this and other Bond sites have been discussing which title they prefer. The Star is reporting on this thread http://debrief.comma...showtopic=44870 (or another like it here or at MI6 - I can't be bothered to look) and we have finally got a title rumour?
Um... not really.
sure it's pure BS but nice to get something else to talk about. I was afraid "should James bond eat a sandwhich in Bond 23" was going to be the next thread.
#69
Posted 16 February 2010 - 02:47 PM
#70
Posted 16 February 2010 - 02:50 PM
Did u read the article the star is saying bond 23 will ether be Risico or the property of a lady because of our discussions.Do i beleive it.. Hell no but am i glad we finnaly got a bloody title rumour and 2 to be exact YES....
How have we got a title rumour? Fans on this and other Bond sites have been discussing which title they prefer. The Star is reporting on this thread http://debrief.comma...showtopic=44870 (or another like it here or at MI6 - I can't be bothered to look) and we have finally got a title rumour?
Um... not really.
sure it's pure BS but nice to get something else to talk about. I was afraid "should James bond eat a sandwhich in Bond 23" was going to be the next thread.
What is there to talk about? It's a BS article by your own admission, and yes I read it.
'We and Sam are listening very closely to what the fans are saying and there is every possibility that we might latch on to one of their ideas.'
That is hardly the same as saying Bond 23 will have either of these titles. And it's quite obviously an invented quote anyway.
Moving on...
#71
Posted 16 February 2010 - 03:07 PM
#72
Posted 16 February 2010 - 06:46 PM
Agreed WHEN are we gonna get some real news???Since the poster of this... 'news' just admitted that this article is BS, shouldn't it be moved to the Bond 23 Tabloid Trash Bin? Considering it shouldn't warrant it's own thread.
#73
Posted 16 February 2010 - 06:53 PM
Agreed WHEN are we gonna get some real news???Since the poster of this... 'news' just admitted that this article is BS, shouldn't it be moved to the Bond 23 Tabloid Trash Bin? Considering it shouldn't warrant it's own thread.
When Eon feels like it.
#74
Posted 16 February 2010 - 09:05 PM
What I don't get is why My thing is in tabloid trash yet when the sun did there whole Bond 22 is risico that got 2 pages of discussion and was never tossed into the corner.
Heck Shouldn't Bond 23 in 3d be in the tabloid trashbin too, I mean that is PURE BS and we all know it.
this is really just Mharkin Striking back at me for my comments on the sam mendes thread and I'm not amused by this in fact i'm quite annoyed.
#75
Posted 16 February 2010 - 09:23 PM
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
#76
Posted 16 February 2010 - 10:51 PM
Calm down. It's only an unmade, unfinanced and clearly untitled movie. It is tabloid trash. You are clearly getting yourself in forum knots about wanting a rumour...(!). A rumour is only that and this story is the rumour of a rumour of a not rumoured rumour.
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
true. Rough Day and editing my older post would make your post make no sense so I'll leave it up there....
my enthusiasim is running thin I'm getting to the point where i think I'll give up bond forum's for lent (40 days starting tommorow for those who don't know what lent is)...
#77
Posted 16 February 2010 - 11:05 PM
Calm down. It's only an unmade, unfinanced and clearly untitled movie. It is tabloid trash. You are clearly getting yourself in forum knots about wanting a rumour...(!). A rumour is only that and this story is the rumour of a rumour of a not rumoured rumour.
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
true. Rough Day and editing my older post would make your post make no sense so I'll leave it up there....
my enthusiasim is running thin I'm getting to the point where i think I'll give up bond forum's for lent (40 days starting tommorow for those who don't know what lent is)...
I think quantum, it might be safer to give up sugar in your tea.
Just think, there you are in the middle of your fast and BINGO, a real story pops up.
#78
Posted 17 February 2010 - 01:37 AM
Yerah right like that would happenCalm down. It's only an unmade, unfinanced and clearly untitled movie. It is tabloid trash. You are clearly getting yourself in forum knots about wanting a rumour...(!). A rumour is only that and this story is the rumour of a rumour of a not rumoured rumour.
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
true. Rough Day and editing my older post would make your post make no sense so I'll leave it up there....
my enthusiasim is running thin I'm getting to the point where i think I'll give up bond forum's for lent (40 days starting tommorow for those who don't know what lent is)...
I think quantum, it might be safer to give up sugar in your tea.
Just think, there you are in the middle of your fast and BINGO, a real story pops up.
i'm sure when i come back on easter Mendes is confirmed the release date has been announced as August 12th 2011 4 locations have been announced and The title has been announced as The Hilderbrand Rarity.
#79
Posted 17 February 2010 - 02:19 AM
Yerah right like that would happenCalm down. It's only an unmade, unfinanced and clearly untitled movie. It is tabloid trash. You are clearly getting yourself in forum knots about wanting a rumour...(!). A rumour is only that and this story is the rumour of a rumour of a not rumoured rumour.
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
true. Rough Day and editing my older post would make your post make no sense so I'll leave it up there....
my enthusiasim is running thin I'm getting to the point where i think I'll give up bond forum's for lent (40 days starting tommorow for those who don't know what lent is)...
I think quantum, it might be safer to give up sugar in your tea.
Just think, there you are in the middle of your fast and BINGO, a real story pops up.
i'm sure when i come back on easter Mendes is confirmed the release date has been announced as August 12th 2011 4 locations have been announced and The title has been announced as The Hilderbrand Rarity.
Well Happy Easter anyway.
I'll eat an extra Cadbury's Creme Egg in honour of your absence.
#80
Posted 17 February 2010 - 03:21 AM
Yerah right like that would happenCalm down. It's only an unmade, unfinanced and clearly untitled movie. It is tabloid trash. You are clearly getting yourself in forum knots about wanting a rumour...(!). A rumour is only that and this story is the rumour of a rumour of a not rumoured rumour.
I don't think anyone is getting at anyone here - apart from a few people finding - perhaps - some threads going over and over absolutely nothing. Well that is what I think....
true. Rough Day and editing my older post would make your post make no sense so I'll leave it up there....
my enthusiasim is running thin I'm getting to the point where i think I'll give up bond forum's for lent (40 days starting tommorow for those who don't know what lent is)...
I think quantum, it might be safer to give up sugar in your tea.
Just think, there you are in the middle of your fast and BINGO, a real story pops up.
i'm sure when i come back on easter Mendes is confirmed the release date has been announced as August 12th 2011 4 locations have been announced and The title has been announced as The Hilderbrand Rarity.
Well Happy Easter anyway.
I'll eat an extra Cadbury's Creme Egg in honour of your absence.
I might come back on I might not I am gonna be on here less during the 40 days of lent though that is a promise
anyone want to still talk 007 with me PM me.
#81
Posted 17 February 2010 - 07:48 AM
I will never know why people continue to suggest Hollywood stars when we know that the last three movies have included relative unknowns as the baddies. I think the next Bond villain actor will only be as famous as Toby Stephens, Mads Mikkelsen and Mathieu Amalric were before they starred in a 007 flick.
I heartily agree...please, no "stars"....just great actors...
#82
Posted 19 February 2010 - 03:29 AM
http://www.cinemaspy...cle.php?id=4042
Sam worthington to replace daniel craig in bond 23!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#83
Posted 19 February 2010 - 06:12 AM
as if the christiansen crap wasn't enough
http://www.cinemaspy...cle.php?id=4042
Sam worthington to replace daniel craig in bond 23!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Craig´s decision to film "Dream House" is supposed to be a reason for the delay of Bond 23? And the producers aren´t able to get a new script ready since "QOS"?
As you were correctly calling the other story "crap", this one is totally absurd and just craving for attention without any base.
#84
Posted 21 February 2010 - 03:39 AM
All of sudden now this delay on Bond 23 has caused some stirring as to whether Danny will even return?
Your thoughts
#85
Posted 21 February 2010 - 04:11 AM
http://www.cinemaspy...cle.php?id=4042
All of sudden now this delay on Bond 23 has caused some stirring as to whether Danny will even return?
Your thoughts
Contact Music = garbage
#86
Posted 21 February 2010 - 04:26 AM
Ignore it.
#88
Posted 21 February 2010 - 11:29 AM
Topic moved to B23 Tabloid trash.http://www.cinemaspy...cle.php?id=4042
All of sudden now this delay on Bond 23 has caused some stirring as to whether Danny will even return?
Your thoughts
Contact Music and the Mail on Sunday quoted as sources in an article that reads like the mother of Bond Tabloid Trash™, has to be utter BS
#89
Posted 15 March 2010 - 08:23 PM
Um… so yeah. Not much news there. Sorry.
I thought maybe if it was a vicious battle, some of that angry energy might make its way into Bond. The way the article reads, it’s more likely to drive Mendes deeper into his preferred theme of melodramatic suburban struggles.
Maybe this time we’ll see Bond do something exciting like saving money on the purchase of a foreclosed house?
#90
Posted 15 March 2010 - 08:51 PM