(sidenote: Purrrow! Pierce is hott!)

After the Sunset (2004)
#91
Posted 23 August 2004 - 09:01 PM
(sidenote: Purrrow! Pierce is hott!)
#92
Posted 23 August 2004 - 09:46 PM
Psst! Penelope is hott.Scan from Entertainment Weekly with Picture and Text from After The Sunset...
(sidenote: Purrrow! Pierce is hott!)
#93
Posted 24 August 2004 - 03:07 PM
#94
Posted 24 August 2004 - 09:53 PM
#95
Posted 24 August 2004 - 09:57 PM
#96
Posted 25 August 2004 - 12:52 AM
#97
Posted 27 August 2004 - 11:21 PM
#98
Posted 27 August 2004 - 11:40 PM
I hope I'm not too late for that group hug in the corner...

#99
Posted 28 August 2004 - 03:19 AM
Look great and i see that Pierce Brosnan
#101
Posted 02 September 2004 - 02:37 PM
#102
Posted 02 September 2004 - 05:38 PM
And I agree with his other roles looking more Bond accomplished than when doing Bond.
#103
Posted 02 September 2004 - 05:52 PM


#104
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:00 PM

#105
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:04 PM
Why do you say that Loomis? Granted, he has the largest amount of space on there practically, but he is the main star. At least there are other cast members on there as well. It's not like the Die Another Day poster where it was just Brosnan and Berry....and is much too prominent
#106
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:12 PM
Maybe he's chasing the communist vote.Why do you say that Loomis? Granted, he has the largest amount of space on there practically, but he is the main star. At least there are other cast members on there as well.
#107
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:29 PM
#108
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:31 PM
Odd decision to obscure quite a lot of Mr Brosnan's face, unless it's some reflection of his non-Bond pulling power.
#109
Posted 02 September 2004 - 06:33 PM
It looks pretty good that way. Shares the poster with the others.Odd decision to obscure quite a lot of Mr Brosnan's face, unless it's some reflection of his non-Bond pulling power.
#110
Posted 02 September 2004 - 08:35 PM
What's up with Brosnan's eyes?
Is it supposed to be a horror movie?
#111
Posted 02 September 2004 - 08:42 PM
What is it communicating?
Is has no clear message.
It looks like straight-to-video artwork and what's with those eyes?
I'd give it 1 out of 10 and the trailer 3 out of 10.
The only thing that might appeal to the audience is "from the director of Rush Hour."
This movie will be a moderate flop. (30m USA 60m worldwide MAX)
#112
Posted 02 September 2004 - 09:31 PM

#113
Posted 03 September 2004 - 01:29 AM
Other than that, it's pretty good, I think.
#114
Posted 03 September 2004 - 01:35 AM
Well he is wearing sunglasses.Is that poster a joke?
What's up with Brosnan's eyes?
Is it supposed to be a horror movie?
#115
Posted 03 September 2004 - 01:54 AM
#116
Posted 03 September 2004 - 02:01 AM
If this is how they are marketing the movie, I can't see it doing well at the box-office.
#117
Posted 03 September 2004 - 02:02 AM
Why though? Compare it to the US poster of say...Die Another Day for example.I am sorry to sound ultra-critical but I'm not criticising Brosnan, just the poster.
If this is how they are marketing the movie, I can't see it doing well at the box-office.
#118
Posted 24 September 2004 - 03:47 AM
Attached Files
#119
Posted 28 September 2004 - 01:34 AM
Iam afraid that Paradiso Entertainment,make the same mistake as with The Humain Stain.
That mean
#120
Posted 29 September 2004 - 03:59 AM
I FOUND THIS WHILE SURFING www.aintitcool.com WEBSITE. HOPE THIS WILL HELP.
Here