Yes I have, handy things. We can't see below their waists anyways. They could be wearing boxers.Ever heard of PANTS!both need to sleep don't they?

After the Sunset (2004)
#31
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:15 PM
#32
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:16 PM
Time to change the title to this thread

#33
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:18 PM
Nah....besides, we all know it got your hopes up, didn't it?Time to change the title to this thread
EDIT: Good call in changing the title of this thread! After all, one wouldn't want a platoon of Brosnazis kicking one's head in, would one?

-- Xen
#34
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:18 PM
#35
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:18 PM
Rather LITTLE PANTS don't you think?They could be wearing boxers.
#36
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:20 PM
HEY!Rather LITTLE PANTS don't you think?They could be wearing boxers.
No guessing about the size of Remington's steele, here.

-- Xen
#37
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:20 PM
#38
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:20 PM
But a barrier none the lessRather LITTLE PANTS don't you think?They could be wearing boxers.

#39
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:21 PM
Hey, at least Rupert Everett would have got a kick out of it.What can I say,... The title you had was misrepresentation.
(and yes, I changed the title right as Jim posted that)

No hard feelings hun, just messing.
#40
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:25 PM
But a barrier none the less
"A very small one" in answer to both of you blinded Brosnan loversNo guessing about the size of Remington's steele, here.

#41
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:27 PM
No hard feelings. But when I read your original title I think my heart stopped.No hard feelings hun, just messing.

But in real life, I really don't believe for one second that Brosnan is homosexual. Maybe a bit metrosexual (you all know what that means right?) though, and there's nothing wrong with a man who takes good care of himself (but then again I do live in Hollywood, others may feel differently).
Blind and loving every minute of it!...both of you blinded Brosnan lovers

#42
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:33 PM
And would have liked to see what your heart would have done if i'd kept the original thread title : "Pierce in bed with a Woody"
#43
Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:40 PM
And by all accounts, he makes a lovely beau, too.
-- Xen
#44
Posted 27 May 2004 - 04:51 PM
Actually... Metrosexual does NOT mean bisexual.Perhaps Athena, but a bisexual is still a homosexual in my neck of the woods.
metrosexual: An urban male with a strong aesthetic sense who spends a great deal of time and money on his appearance and lifestyle.
I supposed that would have made my heart beat fasterAnd would have liked to see what your heart would have done if i'd kept the original thread title : "Pierce in bed with a Woody"

#45
Posted 27 May 2004 - 05:07 PM

#46
Posted 27 May 2004 - 06:19 PM
And I can't wait for the day the word "metrosexual" disappears. It has nothing to do with one's sexual orientation and yet it has the word "sexual" in it.
#47
Posted 27 May 2004 - 07:34 PM
Maybe we can start a new word... instead of metrosexual how about metroaesthetic... ok no.
#48
Posted 27 May 2004 - 07:34 PM
Yes, a more suitable "family friendly" title would be:Time to change the title to this thread
The New Morecambe & Wise Show.
#49
Posted 27 May 2004 - 08:57 PM

And either way, what is the problem? There is after all a difference between what an actor portrays in his movie, and what his personal life is like. As for Mr. Brosnan, there is more than enough proof that he is straight, e.g. his devotion to his wife. It is very simplistic to judge people by their looks, though, sadly, it is done often.
Edited by Paris, 27 May 2004 - 08:59 PM.
#50
Posted 27 May 2004 - 09:04 PM
Isn't David Beckham one?metrosexual: An urban male with a strong aesthetic sense who spends a great deal of time and money on his appearance and lifestyle.
#51
Posted 28 May 2004 - 01:14 AM
#52
Posted 28 May 2004 - 03:10 AM
I'm joking Athena, we're not that backward hereActually... Metrosexual does NOT mean bisexual.

And I know Pierce isn't gay, just having a laugh to pass the time between Bond movies

#53
Posted 28 May 2004 - 10:17 PM
#54
Posted 28 May 2004 - 10:53 PM
You are a very wise man.If you know both of you are straight males or females, what does it matter? It doesn't.
And I can't wait for the day the word "metrosexual" disappears. It has nothing to do with one's sexual orientation and yet it has the word "sexual" in it.

#55
Posted 14 June 2004 - 01:31 PM
NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT!
Although I did notice in the Taylor of Panama Pierce's character was a regular at the local gay bar... mmmm?
#56
Posted 04 August 2004 - 07:58 PM
I will say that Pierce looks good.
#57
Posted 04 August 2004 - 08:07 PM
You betcha! YUMMY!!!!! *drool*I will say that Pierce looks good.
ThanX for the link, mccartney! I can't wait for more content.
#58
Posted 04 August 2004 - 08:08 PM
#59
Posted 04 August 2004 - 09:01 PM
#60
Posted 04 August 2004 - 09:06 PM
Synopsis from moviepublicity.com.
(Release Date: November 12, 2004)
Director: Brett Ratner
Starring: Pierce Brosnan, Woody Harrelson, Salma Hayek
After The Sunset begins where most action capers end - with master thieves Max and Lola (Pierce Brosnan and Salma Hayek) escaping to a tropical paradise to enjoy the spoils of their labor. The thieves are content to settle into their new life after crime, until their nemesis from the FBI (Woody Harrelson) tracks them down, convinced that their