
Christmas Jones should have been played by....
#1
Posted 20 January 2003 - 06:27 PM
NOTE: I am editing this post because I've come to terms with Denise R. as CJ. Never had a real problem with her. Just was wishing for Species chick or hot lawyer from Desperate Hours. But no more pining for Natasha Henstridge or Kelly Lynch. I'll take Denise, anyday. Thanks for everyone's inputs and suggestions, though.
Go, Denise!!
#2
Posted 20 January 2003 - 06:34 PM
- KIM BASINGER
- LORRAINE BRACCO
- KIM CATTRALL
- SIGOURNEY WEAVER
- DEBRA WINGER.
#3
Posted 20 January 2003 - 06:37 PM
Originally posted by Loomis
Well, she should have been played by a much older actress. It's implausible that someone in her 20s could be such an experienced nuclear physicist. Had I been the casting director, I'd've looked at people like:
- KIM BASINGER
- LORRAINE BRACCO
- KIM CATTRALL
- SIGOURNEY WEAVER
- DEBRA WINGER.
Good choices, L. Love the idea of Sigourney and Kim, especially....
#4
Posted 20 January 2003 - 06:39 PM

#5
Posted 21 January 2003 - 04:24 AM
I know this is coming out of nowhere, but Gillian Anderson would have been a nice Christmas Jones.
-- Xenobia
#6
Posted 21 January 2003 - 04:54 AM
#7
Posted 21 January 2003 - 05:26 AM
#8
Posted 21 January 2003 - 11:22 AM
#9
Posted 21 January 2003 - 05:15 PM

But it is strange that Denise Richards looks off-the-scales super hot in every movie she's ever been in, except TWINE. She looks okay...but she wasn't really directed or photographed in a sexy way. I think this is Apted's failing. He didn't seem to notice that he had a mega-sexy woman in his film, in the same way he didn't seem to notice that Bond had a cool-looking car (compare his introduction of the car scene to the one in DAD--the BMW never even makes it above the frame line!). He just didn't seem to care a lick about anything but the DRAMA.
#10
Posted 21 January 2003 - 05:20 PM
Originally posted by brendan007
i think denise made a great bond girl, i prefer her over halle berry. it was a pity that dr jones was given so little to do.
Well, honestly, it's nice to see Denise getting support. I bemoan more the revising of the character than Denise Richards playing her. And I do not think that she was anywhere near as bad as Tanya Roberts as Stacey Sutton. Ms. Richards gave the character spunk and capability.
But the Christmas Jones of my dreams is and will always be Natasha Henstridge. She may have been in her late twenties when TWINE was being cast, but she has a gravity that makes her seem wordly. And now that I also know Darryl Hannah might have been in the running for the role (as per Xen), I can not help but think how much stronger TWINE would have been with her as Dr. Christmas Jones. Guess we'll never know.
Nevertheless, Denise did what she could with what she was given. One of the other folks here has a signature block that reads ' The Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Roger Moore' or some words to that effect.
Perhaps there should be one for Denise Richards....

#11
Posted 21 January 2003 - 06:28 PM
AMEN! AND I THINK I AM GOING TO START IT MYSELF WHO WANTS TO JOIN?????Originally posted by iceberg
Well, honestly, it's nice to see Denise getting support. I bemoan more the revising of the character than Denise Richards playing her. And I do not think that she was anywhere near as bad as Tanya Roberts as Stacey Sutton. Ms. Richards gave the character spunk and capability.
But the Christmas Jones of my dreams is and will always be Natasha Henstridge. She may have been in her late twenties when TWINE was being cast, but she has a gravity that makes her seem wordly. And now that I also know Darryl Hannah might have been in the running for the role (as per Xen), I can not help but think how much stronger TWINE would have been with her as Dr. Christmas Jones. Guess we'll never know.
Nevertheless, Denise did what she could with what she was given. One of the other folks here has a signature block that reads ' The Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Roger Moore' or some words to that effect.
Perhaps there should be one for Denise Richards....![]()
#12
Posted 21 January 2003 - 09:12 PM
Seriously, TWINE was so dramatically self-important that Denise provided some much needed bimbo sex appeal.
Bimbo sex appeal is fine (just take a look at Miss Goodnight), wooden acting is not.
#13
Posted 21 January 2003 - 09:45 PM
But this another strange thing about Richard's in TWINE. She's not a bad actress. Ever see WILD THINGS? I think poor Denise was cast adrift by her director and maybe her co-star. Maybe Pierce didn't like her because she was prettier than he was. That was a joke. Joke!
#14
Posted 21 January 2003 - 09:49 PM
However, someone did mention Jennifer Connelly, and that's actually not a bad idea--if they wanted to take the role seriously, she could easily pull off someone in her 30s (unless she's already in her 30s?).
#15
Posted 21 January 2003 - 09:54 PM
She's not a bad actress. Ever see WILD THINGS?
Yes I did. But the character she was playing could (and I'm saying could!) be one closer to her own personality and, hence, easier to play. I did like her performance in the film. But I have to ask any warm blooded male which performance they were watching.
#16
Posted 22 January 2003 - 02:20 AM
i will take denise in wild things anyday >thats why i watch that movie so much, just cant get that 3some out of my head lolOriginally posted by Blue Eyes
Yes I did. But the character she was playing could (and I'm saying could!) be one closer to her own personality and, hence, easier to play. I did like her performance in the film. But I have to ask any warm blooded male which performance they were watching.
#17
Posted 22 January 2003 - 03:44 AM
#18
Posted 22 January 2003 - 04:13 AM

Really, she was terrible. Yes there have been worse but that's damning with faint very faint praise. She filled out her hot pants and wet T-Shirt admirably but to call her performance wooden as Daniel did is being generous. People laughed at her in the theater, and not when she was making jokes but when she was trying to pronounce words like atomic. Somehow I don't think that was intended. Her performance while not as bad as Tanya Robert's (also a beautiful woman) was cringeworthy. And I consider it a blessing her role was cut down. Her role was sketchy but not as abyssmal as some others (Mary Goodnight for example) in the series but she did her best to make the least of it. And no I don't blame her "acting" on anyone but her, it's that dreadful. Oh she sucked in Starship Troopers too where she was suppossed to playing a brainy pilot, but then almost everyone sucked in that film so she didn't stick out as much. She's a little better in bad girl teenage bimbo roles because then she can work the pout and the body, and no one has to believe she has a brain in her head, otherwise she's pretty much adrift or rather drift wood.

#19
Posted 22 January 2003 - 05:54 AM
#20
Posted 22 January 2003 - 07:03 AM
#21
Posted 22 January 2003 - 10:16 AM
she is a very good actor
Oh come on, you're strecting it a bit now. Yeah she's great to look at, and she's an okay actresses , but a "very good" one? Very good actresses are Kate Beckinsale, Natalie Portman and people such as Judi Dench are excellent. Denise Richards is not in either of these classes.
#22
Posted 22 January 2003 - 10:47 AM
Originally posted by Mourning Becomes Electra
... an actress.
Really, she was terrible. Yes there have been worse but that's damning with faint very faint praise. She filled out her hot pants and wet T-Shirt admirably but to call her performance wooden as Daniel did is being generous. People laughed at her in the theater, and not when she was making jokes but when she was trying to pronounce words like atomic. Somehow I don't think that was intended. Her performance while not as bad as Tanya Robert's (also a beautiful woman) was cringeworthy. And I consider it a blessing her role was cut down. Her role was sketchy but not as abyssmal as some others (Mary Goodnight for example) in the series but she did her best to make the least of it. And no I don't blame her "acting" on anyone but her, it's that dreadful. Oh she sucked in Starship Troopers too where she was suppossed to playing a brainy pilot, but then almost everyone sucked in that film so she didn't stick out as much. She's a little better in bad girl teenage bimbo roles because then she can work the pout and the body, and no one has to believe she has a brain in her head, otherwise she's pretty much adrift or rather drift wood.![]()
Really, he was terrible. Yes there have been worse but that's damning with faint very faint praise (sic). He filled out his dinner jacket admirably but to call his performance wooden as critics did is being generous. People pitied him in the theater (sic), and not when he was acting serious but when he was trying to pronounce words without a hot spud rolling round his gob. Somehow I don't think that was intended. His performance while not as bad as George Lazenby (also a handsome man) was cringeworthy. And I consider it a curse his role was beefed up. His role was polluted and considerably worse than some of the others (Sean Connery, for example) in the series and he did his best to make a meal of it. And no I don't blame his "acting" on anyone but him, it's that dreadful. Oh he sucked in The Tailor of Panama too where he was supposed to playing (sic) a darker character, but then almost everyone sucked in that film so he didn't stick out as much. He's a little better in bad tv movie roles because then he can take the cheque, and no one has to watch, otherwise he's pretty much adrift or rather drift wood.
Which is abuse and which fair comment?
Oh, standards are great. 'Specially when they come in doubles.
#23
Posted 22 January 2003 - 11:15 AM

#24
Posted 22 January 2003 - 12:06 PM
#25
Posted 22 January 2003 - 12:22 PM

#26
Posted 22 January 2003 - 04:25 PM
#27
Posted 22 January 2003 - 04:47 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
I found it hard and may be still do to look at her , with "getting aroused"
Ok that is a little too much horrifying information...
#28
Posted 22 January 2003 - 08:03 PM
#29
Posted 22 January 2003 - 09:31 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
what was wrong with her then?? Perhaps too much information , yes but horrifying no. She is an attractive women . so get over it.
I wasn't referring to her, of course she's hot; I was referring to the fact that I don't need to envision some dork getting a hard-on...it was light humor
#30
Posted 22 January 2003 - 09:41 PM