The types of people who like DAD
#121
Posted 24 December 2002 - 05:43 AM
#122
Posted 24 December 2002 - 06:04 AM
Mind you, leaving on an adreniline high isn't such a bad thing. I know of people who pay good money for that.
#123
Posted 24 December 2002 - 01:15 PM
I propose a Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Squirrels...
#124
Posted 25 December 2002 - 01:19 AM
BTW: Thanks for the Christmas card, Xen.
#125
Posted 25 December 2002 - 05:38 PM
#126
Posted 25 December 2002 - 08:49 PM
#127
Posted 26 December 2002 - 02:17 PM
#128
Posted 29 December 2002 - 07:58 AM
Now, I loved DAD, it was the most all around entertaining Bond film (in my eyes). Not everyone thought so, but so what? I only know what I like, and I really liked DAD.
#129
Posted 29 December 2002 - 08:49 AM
Originally posted by Red Widow Dawn
It seems to me...that the types of people who thought DAD was the best Bond movie ever...are the types that laugh with delight when they see squirrels outside their windows.
Not to be cruel or anything...but it seems that every time a new Bond movie rolls around, there's that same group of people that latches onto it merely because it's new. The frivolous type, I imagine.
Comments? Flames? :cool:
Nope, I liked DAD because it was enjoyable, fun and entertaining for me. Sorry you didn't see it my way.
And btw, generalizing across a broad scope of people is a usually a bad idea. I'm not lecturing, just trying to let you know.
#130
Posted 29 December 2002 - 09:42 AM
#131
Posted 29 December 2002 - 10:01 AM
If I can put in a few cents worth, seeing each new Bond film is, for a Bond fan, an experience that can never quite be recaptured. We come to it with high hopes and expectations, and the adrenalin starts pumping when that white dot marches across the screen. To some extent the excitement of the long awaited experience disarms critical faculties. We lap up each new surprise or thrill. We, myself included, do experience an unsophisticated delight that is, perhaps, not unlike gawping at gambolling squirrels.
Subsequent viewings can never recapture the initial experience. Sometimes we have our first impression confirmed, often we modify it.
Perhaps none of us will really be able to place DAD in context vis a vis the other films in the series until the novelty wears off - perhaps not until the next film appears.
I know my own judgement on the best and worse films in the Bond canon varies from time to time. Films I once thought the world of, like Goldfinger or Thunderball, I've gone off, perhaps through simply seeing them so often in too short an interval that I've O'Ded on them.
It's a little like "love at first sight", seeing a new Bond film. We're immediately kind of infatuated. Sometimes an abiding love results, sometimes we begin to perceive flaws that eventually turn us off. Sometimes we simply become jaded and bored through spending too much time with it.
I don't think it's a measure of shallow critical faculties for some of us to come out of the theatre saying DAD is the best of the Bond films. It simply reflects the fact that DAD has provided an exciting, thrilling and satisfying cinematic experience that seems, at the time, to eclipse the experience of seeing previous entries in the series. Especially if we've seen some of the early ones only on the small screen.
Time may confirm or modify our initial enthusiasm. But I think it'd be a shame to criticize or belittle that initial buzz just because we might not share it.
Here endeth the lesson.
#132
Posted 29 December 2002 - 05:34 PM
In the end, I was entertained, my intelligence (such as it is) wasn't insulted too much, and the sight of Halle Berry falling over in a backward dive off a cliff alone was worth the price of admission. Then again, it doesn't take much to make me happy.
Bottom line: DAD is DAD. Not FRWL, not GF, not TB, not GE, not FYEO, not TND, not TWINE, not GE, not MR (okay, maybe a little) and -- thank the entire pantheon of gods for this one -- not AVTAK.
Next to the Bottom line: I enjoyed DAD immensely, but then again I also used to get a kick out of feeding Oreo cookies to the psychotic squirrels that have overrun UCLA (Or maybe they were chipmunks) so obviously my judgement is questionable...
#133
Posted 01 January 2003 - 09:58 PM
#134
Posted 02 January 2003 - 01:25 PM
Originally posted by iceberg
Hey, I was just happy the flippin movie finally came out. After an interminable amount of waiting and fretting and posting and speculating and arguing and cajoling and generally wondering who the traitor was/what Icarus was/is Jinx-Miranda good or bad/what type of hair gel Graves uses to keep his hair in-place during the fencing scenes in the trailer, DAD was finally released and I went to see it,
I don't understand why anyone would want to know THAT much about a movie before seeing it in the theater??!! I personally like to go in not knowing anything but maybe some scant idea of which actors are appearing. Before this movie came out I knew it had something to do with Korea, that Halle Berry and someone named Rosamund Pike was in it and that it was a James Bond movie.
I felt I knew too much about TWINE when it opened, and it totally spoiled the experience for me.
I even avoided watching the trailer. I'm glad I did, MGM should be ashamed of putting out such a spoiler heavy trailer.
#135
Posted 02 January 2003 - 11:01 PM
Originally posted by DanMan
Red Widow Dawn, the reason I and 85% of filmgoers enjoyed DAD is because we simply know how to enjoy a great movie. If you go into the theater with a notebook and write down every flaw, your not going to enjoy the movie. .
That's a little narrow minded isn't it? Because he didn't enjoy it, he doesn't know how to enjoy a good film?
I don't think it was a good film either. The first hour was great but the plot and direction takes a massive dive in the second hour and the script looses its focus. Im not really going to get into it. But just because he doesn't like it and you do, doesn't make it a great movie.
#136
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:27 AM
Originally posted by 1q2w3e4r
. But just because he doesn't like it and you do, doesn't make it a great movie.
True, but just because he doesnt like it and we do doesnt make us retarded. You gotta see things from both sides of the argument. We're only lashing out because he insulted us.
#137
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:32 AM
#138
Posted 03 January 2003 - 03:44 AM
-- Xenobia
#139
Posted 03 January 2003 - 07:02 AM
It's going to be called "Acorns Are Forever."
#140
Posted 03 January 2003 - 08:29 AM
#141
Posted 03 January 2003 - 09:31 AM
#142
Posted 03 January 2003 - 09:56 AM
#143
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:20 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I don't understand why anyone would want to know THAT much about a movie before seeing it in the theater??!! I personally like to go in not knowing anything but maybe some scant idea of which actors are appearing. Before this movie came out I knew it had something to do with Korea, that Halle Berry and someone named Rosamund Pike was in it and that it was a James Bond movie.
I felt I knew too much about TWINE when it opened, and it totally spoiled the experience for me.
I even avoided watching the trailer. I'm glad I did, MGM should be ashamed of putting out such a spoiler heavy trailer.
Actually, DLN. All I really wanted to know was.... "What type of hair gel Gustav Graves uses to keep his hair in-place during the fencing scene?"
P.S. No it wasn't the curious gel from THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY
#144
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:24 PM
Originally posted by Xenobia
Yeah...but what about dem squirrels? Where are they now?
-- Xenobia
Xen....They have appeared in another thread. I just saw them crop up in the "Who's the Punk" thread ---- the traitors!!
#145
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:30 PM
Originally posted by iceberg
Actually, DLN. All I really wanted to know was.... "What type of hair gel Gustav Graves uses to keep his hair in-place during the fencing scene?"
P.S. No it wasn't the curious gel from THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY![]()
I hope I don't know anything about Bond 21 when it appears in the theater. Unfortunately, with my position in the media industry that's unlikely.
#146
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:41 PM
However, I am going to attempt (must emphasize that word) to be deaf, blind, and mute about Bond 21.
And maybe squirrels will fall out of the sky.
(Holy cow! They're everywhere! Good God, is there no sanctuary from them?!!! Who will live to tell the tale?!!!)
Ciao, and Happy First Week of The New Year....
#147
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:50 PM
Originally posted by iceberg
Seriously, though. I agree with you. I think my intense curiosity about DAD did spoil it somewhat for me. Overall, still a fairly enjoyable experience.
However, I am going to attempt (must emphasize that word) to be deaf, blind, and mute about Bond 21.
I think the experience of seeing a Bond movie is that much more intense if you do not know much about it. I learnt this going to see TWINE. I knew so much about the movie there was no surprises.
#148
Posted 04 January 2003 - 12:01 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I think the experience of seeing a Bond movie is that much more intense if you do not know much about it. I learnt this going to see TWINE. I knew so much about the movie there was no surprises.
I agree. Loved TWINE, despite its seeming unpopularity with most Bond fans. However, I also knew far too much going in. Two main dead giveways (which have nothing to do with the film itself, but rather with its marketing):
1.) THE TRAILER: (Elektra leaning into M's face to say, "Bond", in a manner that is, shall we say, not too sisterly; Bond saying "She has M" and then showing the scene in the Oil terminal with Elektra walking away from M as the latter looks around in terror and realizes she has been set up--and without her tumbler of Bourbon for comfort, no less)
2.) THOSE DAMN FALL MOVIE PREVIEW LISTS: A few of them were kind enough to safeguard TWINE's twist by summarizing the film like this:
"Bond's 19th adventure finds him being assigned to protect Elektra King, the beautiful daughter of a slain British Oil tycoon. Soon, however, it becomes clear that Elektra has more to her than meets the eye, and may even have been involved her father's murder. Bond's only ally is an American nuclear scientist who finds herself inadverdently drawn into the chaos."
Thanks, folks. That really cleared up who the Good Bond Girl and the Bad Bond Girl was. P.S. Be a dear and flush my subscription down the nearest toilet.
Anyway, DLN. You're right.
#149
Posted 04 January 2003 - 04:07 PM
I so agree. I tried to not learn too much about DAD. I avoided plot spoilers, etc. But somehow I still knew everything going in. All I need to see is a pic and gears start turning and I put the plot together in my head. It was eaiser back before the internet. Very hard now to remain unspoiled.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I think the experience of seeing a Bond movie is that much more intense if you do not know much about it. I learnt this going to see TWINE. I knew so much about the movie there was no surprises.
#150
Posted 05 January 2003 - 03:41 AM

