Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

The Man from U.N.C.L.E. - Feature Film


130 replies to this topic

#91 chrisno1

chrisno1

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 931 posts

Posted 25 August 2015 - 08:43 PM

Saw this today and quite enjoyed it. It had (as most posters have recognized) a very 1960s feel to it: the fashions, the music, the slightly freewheeling spirit, the Cold War, the split screens, the European locations used as if we'd never seen them before and for no apparent reason - like, why was one scene set at a motor racing track? No reason, just looks good.

There was lots of little sharp one-liners and the interplay between all the lead characters was excellent. The action was well edited and framed and didn't seem to over power the actors or the story, which is a common fault of most modern actioners. I liked the quick explanatory flashbacks that made clear some of what we'd witnessed earlier in the movie. I thought Cavill particularly was very good. I was very impressed with the sequence where he decides whether or not to commit to a rescue, sipping wine and chewing lunch as he does so. This was an excellent scene which tells you much about his character.

My only real sticky point was the 'origin' nature of the film. I agree with Kaplan (below); there really was no need for them to show how UNCLE was formed. I always assumed UNCLE had been around years before either Solo or Kuriyakin came on the scene. The way they managed it here seemed to suggest its less of a United Nations espionage department and more a gang of rogue agents meshed together to form a secret club.

None the less a thoroughly enjoyable movie. Probably better than MI:RN for me, but only because I always preferred UNCLE to MI.



#92 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 25 August 2015 - 09:18 PM

In reading most of the reviews online the main criticism seems to be "style over substance."



#93 Grard Bond

Grard Bond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 25 August 2015 - 09:41 PM

I am still hesitate to see this movie. The trailer doesn't look like anything I can remember about this great and fun Tv show.

I'm afraid Ritchie screwed this one up like he did with the Holmes movies (I mean: bullet time in a Sherlock Holmes movie!).

 

Are they using the famous The Man from UNCLE theme at the main titles and has the movie also the (in-)famous bumpers between scene's like in the old Tv show?


Edited by Grard Bond, 25 August 2015 - 09:42 PM.


#94 Emrayfo

Emrayfo

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 193 posts
  • Location:Severnaya

Posted 26 August 2015 - 12:54 AM

I am still hesitate to see this movie. The trailer doesn't look like anything I can remember about this great and fun Tv show.

I'm afraid Ritchie screwed this one up like he did with the Holmes movies (I mean: bullet time in a Sherlock Holmes movie!).

 

Are they using the famous The Man from UNCLE theme at the main titles and has the movie also the (in-)famous bumpers between scene's like in the old Tv show?

 

If someone is convinced they are not going to enjoy a re-imagining of a beloved favourite then it probably is best to give said-reimagining a miss. For my part, I never really liked the TV show all that much but I did enjoy this film. It keeps enough of the original conceits to be recognisable without trying to shoehorn in too many references or homages that just might not work now, like relying heavily on the original theme music (which is just a little too dated and not iconic enough to work now). A slavish devotion to an original that was, frankly, kind of made-up as it went along may win the hearts of original fans but may make it harder to win new fans.

 

I didn't mind the 'origin' story as presented in the film as most people going to see it would no nothing or little about the original and just dropping them into the middle of an ongoing UN organisation could be confusing. The origin process followed in the film also allowed for the introduction and establishment of the characters.



#95 Grard Bond

Grard Bond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 27 August 2015 - 08:38 PM

You said it yourself: you didn't like the original Tv show, so all those things doesn't matter to you, but I liked it a lot, so I want the main theme, which's stil great and ofcourse it would work now.

And frankly I'm a little fed up with the origin story stuff these days. Why would it be confusing if you see two secret agents fighting against Thrush or other villains, without knowing how they became partners? It's not exactly rocket science.

One of the attractive things about the David McCallum character was that you didn't know a lot about him and that made him some what mysterious.

 

What I'm hearing from other fans is that the movie is too long and that there's not that many action, but a lot of talking, talking and talking...


Edited by Grard Bond, 01 September 2015 - 06:33 PM.


#96 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 05:39 AM

This is a totally fresh take on the concept but retains the essence of the TV series. If you are looking for a copy of the TV series then this is not for you. However a lot of old time UNCLE fans really like the film because it does stand on it's own. BTW the original series was not much on action and relied on dialog.................so I don't know what the problem would be about it not having much action..................


Edited by delfloria, 28 August 2015 - 06:09 AM.


#97 OHMSS Spion

OHMSS Spion

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 244 posts
  • Location:Alexandria, VA

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:53 PM

Why would it be confusing if you see two secret agents fighting against Thrush or other villains, without knowing how they became partners? It's not exactly rocket science.


Considering that it's an American agent and a Russian agent working together during the Cold War, I'd say that needs some explanation.

#98 saint mark

saint mark

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 146 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 03:16 PM

Loved the movie and want a sequel.



#99 George Kaplan

George Kaplan

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 118 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 07:19 PM

You said it yourself: you didn't like the original Tv show, so all those things doesn't matter to you, but I liked it a lot, so I want the main theme, which's stil great and ofcourse it would work now.

And frankly I'm a little fed up with the original story stuff these days. Why would it be confusing if you see two secret agents fighting against Thrush or other villains, without knowing how they became partners? It's not exactly rocket science.

One of the attractive things about the David McCallum character was that you didn't know a lot about him and that made him some what mysterious.

 

What I'm hearing from other fans is that the movie is too long and that there's not that many action, but a lot of talking, talking and talking...

 

I'll agree that part of the appeal of Kuryakin was that he was a mystery in the original show.  I also agree that ultimately you don't really need to explain why two agents are taking on THRUSH provided you have the context of UNCLE.  But ultimately its not unappealing that they did an origin story (no matter how much I don't think it was necessary).

Story structure, the movie mirrors the show.  Villain has a plot; Kuryakin and Solo have to foil a plot and need an innoncent as an "in" to the villians (much as they recruit the ex-flame in "The Vulcan Affair").  They get in, but experience complications.  Action and shenanigans follow.  There are a few great fun set-pieces, a death trap escape, some chases, etc.  So while its not a replication of the show, it has a lot that the show offered, IMO.


Edited by George Kaplan, 28 August 2015 - 07:20 PM.


#100 Grard Bond

Grard Bond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 28 August 2015 - 11:33 PM

Ok, thanks for your explanation, that sounds not bad at all, so maybe I will check it out.



#101 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 30 August 2015 - 08:25 PM

Strangest film ever............... now getting great reviews, people going to see it several times, up 83% this weekend and is still struggling to make money???????



#102 Grard Bond

Grard Bond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 31 August 2015 - 09:07 PM

I went to see it yesterday.

It's a fun movie, but a little too slow. After a while I got the feeling I was watching it for hours, but only 90 minutes had past.

The problem is: there's no real urgency. Instead of searching for a bomb they visit cocktailparties and the behaving of the two leading men did remind me not realy of the original Tv show, but more of The Persuaders with Curtis + Moore: trying to stab one another windward and chattering during a burglary.

It's not a bad movie, with some fun and suspense, but clearly an  example of style over substance.


Edited by Grard Bond, 31 August 2015 - 09:57 PM.


#103 glidrose

glidrose

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2469 posts

Posted 01 September 2015 - 12:40 AM

Does it have control mines? Sorry, couldn't resist. :D

#104 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 01 September 2015 - 01:47 AM

Not you too!?  :wacko:

 

:P



#105 saint mark

saint mark

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 146 posts

Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:33 PM

I went to see it yesterday.

It's a fun movie, but a little too slow. After a while I got the feeling I was watching it for hours, but only 90 minutes had past.

The problem is: there's no real urgency. Instead of searching for a bomb they visit cocktailparties and the behaving of the two leading men did remind me not realy of the original Tv show, but more of The Persuaders with Curtis + Moore: trying to stab one another windward and chattering during a burglary.

It's not a bad movie, with some fun and suspense, but clearly an  example of style over substance.

The last time I saw style over substance it had huge and inexcusable plotholes.  :D



#106 George Kaplan

George Kaplan

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 118 posts

Posted 01 September 2015 - 07:53 PM

Sorry you didn't like it better, Grard.

 

I can see your comparison to The Pursuaders (although I don't think UNCLE goes as breezy-light as that show did).



#107 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 02 September 2015 - 05:50 AM

Maybe it is style over substance, but that is okay. Sometimes one goes to the cinema for a little fun and does not always need something to think about.

 

I loved the 60's look and feel of the movie. I thought Cavhill did a great job of capturing the essence of Robert Vaughn's Solo without doing an impersination of him.



#108 Emrayfo

Emrayfo

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 193 posts
  • Location:Severnaya

Posted 03 September 2015 - 12:13 AM

Maybe it is style over substance, but that is okay. Sometimes one goes to the cinema for a little fun and does not always need something to think about.

 

I loved the 60's look and feel of the movie. I thought Cavhill did a great job of capturing the essence of Robert Vaughn's Solo without doing an impersination of him.

 

Yes, agreed. Sometimes all you want from a cinema experience is two hours of inexpensive entertainment and escapism. I think, with UNCLE, Guy Ritchie and cast definitely delivered on that count and I hope there is a sequel. Kingsman and UNCLE have both satisfied my needs for lighter spy adventure fare that doesn't take itself too seriously (a bit like the OSS films); even though they are very different films from each other what they do have in common is that they are just a bit of fun escapism - and sometimes that's enough.

 

I'm saving my more serious spy film appetites for SPECTRE and Bourne 5.



#109 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 24 September 2015 - 04:27 PM

I finally got around to seeing it recently, and I enjoyed it. I'm looking forward to getting it on DVD.

It seemed like a "James Bond meets Mad Men meets The Thomas Crown Affair". Bond because it is about secret agents, Mad Men because of the sixties style - Cavill's Solo looking very like Don Draper in suiting, and it even featured Jared Harris from Mad Men as Solo's CIA boss. And Thomas Crown - 60s version - because of the use of split screen at times.

(Thomas Crown has influenced a number of film/TV series - I can even think of a series of political commercials which were directly influenced by the split screen technique.)

The cast was interesting, espacially Cavill as a smart, smart-alec Solo, Hammer as a psychotic Kuryakin, and Hugh Grant as Hugh Grant playing Mr Waverly playing Hugh Grant, if you see what I mean! ;-)

Nice to see the Royal Navy involved, with an aircraft carrier decked with one of my favourite post war 'planes, the Hawker Sea Hawk.

Cons; not many, mostly I found the soundtrack nods to spaghetti western music a bit trying - at least I assume it was Morricone they were nodding to.

Favourite line; Solo to the villainess "I consider myself a specialist in complicated acquisitions."

Scene that made me chuckle, though it shouldn't have; Solo and Kuryakin debating what to do with Gabi's uncle, whilst in the background he has somehow switched on the electric chair he's been strapped to and is frying tonight.

I hope a sequel is made, it appears to be set up for one, though whether it will happen is anyone's guess.



#110 Emrayfo

Emrayfo

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 193 posts
  • Location:Severnaya

Posted 25 September 2015 - 03:12 AM

I hope so too!



#111 George Kaplan

George Kaplan

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 118 posts

Posted 25 September 2015 - 08:43 PM

I'd love to see a sequel, but while it has gone past its estimated cost with the worldwide boxoffice, I don't think its hit the magic number to be considered a hit yet.



#112 LJones41

LJones41

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 8 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 01:46 AM

I've seen "THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E." twice.  I enjoyed it more than I thought I would.  My only real complaint is the costume designs.  The movie is supposed to be set in 1963.  The costumes reflected a period between the late 60s and early 70s.  Come to think of it, "X-MEN: FIRST-CLASS" suffered from the same flaw.



#113 Agent 76

Agent 76

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7080 posts
  • Location:Portugal

Posted 26 September 2015 - 09:42 AM

I saw it recently too and did like it, but still think that something is missing. Perhaps for my tastes it has too much comedic elements, so I could've done with a little bit more of action.

 

Other people have said this and I agree, that the strongest point of the movie really is the relationship between Solo and Kuryakin. Cavill and Hammer really do have a nice chemistry, work well together, one of the best scenes it the watch bit near the end.

 

 

 

I wouldn't mind a sequel, but it seems unlikely at this point with a poor box-office performance as of today.

 

 

PS: This movie actually made me think that a period adaptation of Mission Impossible for cinema could be terrific.



#114 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 11 October 2015 - 05:34 AM

The U.N.C.L.E. Inner Circle group just hit 3,000 worldwide members. Come join us. https://www.facebook...69560823208688/



#115 hoagy

hoagy

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 230 posts

Posted 12 October 2015 - 10:11 PM

The same studio which released UNCLE just took a bad hit with Pan on its opening.  Apparently, they already regard UNCLE -- as well as Jupiter Ascending, which looked non-sensical in trailers -- as big flops.  This does not bode well for UNCLE to get a sequel.

 

Perhaps they can produce one at much lower expense, and they should consider alternatives such as HBO, Netflix, Amazon, even if still produced by the studio.  However, the actors and others who signed on expected to be making movies.  If their minds are open, however, they may realize that much of the best these days appears on premium tv.

 

Another option, of course, would be to move ahead, with production for tv, with different actors.  Given that, they could go ahead and set it in the present.


Yes.  In other words, reboot the reboot...



#116 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 14 October 2015 - 07:50 PM

Own it Nov. 17!

 

Danger has never seemed so alluring when The Man from U.N.C.L.E. arrives onto Blu-ray Combo Pack. Henry Cavill ("Man of Steel") stars as Napoleon Solo opposite Armie Hammer ("The Social Network") as Illya Kuryakin in director Guy Ritchie's action adventure "The Man from U.N.C.L.E.," a fresh take on the hugely popular 1960s television series. "The Man from U.N.C.L.E." will be available on Blu-ray Combo Pack from Warner Bros. Home Entertainment on November 17.

"The Man from U.N.C.L.E." also stars Alicia Vikander ("Ex Machina"), Elizabeth Debicki ("The Great Gatsby"), with Jared Harris ("Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows"), and Hugh Grant as Waverly.

The screenplay was written by Guy Ritchie & Lionel Wigram, who previously collaborated on re-imagining the classic detective Sherlock Holmes in two hit films. The story is by Jeff Kleeman & David Campbell Wilson and Guy Ritchie & Lionel Wigram. John Davis ("Chronicle"), Steve Clark-Hall ("RocknRolla," the "Sherlock Holmes" films), Wigram and Ritchie produced the film alongside executive producer David Dobkin.

Synopsis: Set against the backdrop of the early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, "The Man from U.N.C.L.E." centers on CIA agent Solo and KGB agent Kuryakin. Forced to put aside longstanding hostilities, the two team up on a joint mission to stop a mysterious international criminal organization, which is bent on destabilizing the fragile balance of power through the proliferation of nuclear weapons andtechnology. The duo's only lead is the daughter of a vanished German scientist, who is the key to infiltrating the criminal organization, and they must race against time to find him and prevent a worldwide catastrophe.

Special Features:
Spy Vision: Recreating '60s Cool
A Higher Class Of Hero
Metisse Motorcycles: Proper-And Very British
The Guys from U.N.C.L.E.
A Man of Extraordinary Talents
U.N.C.L.E: On-Set Spy



#117 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 15 October 2015 - 12:35 PM

Still not seen this yet but must catch it on home media, certainly sounds good fun.

#118 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 17 October 2015 - 07:32 PM

The original U.N.C.L.E. TV series returns to broadcast TV in Japan on the day the new UNCLE films opens. How cool is that! Courtesy of the U.N.C.L.E. Inner Circle FB page. https://youtu.be/8sFc6IOxhew



#119 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 03:17 AM

The man from U.N.C.L.E. DVD BLU-RAY combo was released today! https://youtu.be/w_Ky4KPzKwY



#120 Safari Suit

Safari Suit

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5099 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 18 November 2015 - 06:45 PM

I did like the trailers for this, but I was a tad skeptical about it; the feedback was rather mediocre, with even its fans seemingly not able to manage much more than "it's a bit of fun". Plus I'd say I've never been more than lukewarm on a Guy Ritchie movie. But I ended up liking it a lot. It is, indeed, a bit of fun, but very good fun, and stylish with it. I don't believe I've ever seen more than the odd five minutes of the TV series, and that back in the last century, but this did make me want to give it a look sometime soon.

 

Not surprised it flopped though; releasing a movie based on a TV series almost anyone within any major movie-going demographic is at (very) best passingly familiar with during summer was crazy. Granted, I would not have guessed an NWA biopic would gross over four times as much opening weekend. But still.

 

(Oh, and by the by I did quite like SPECTRE. But I probably liked this more!)