
Critical reactions to Skyfall
#541
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:12 PM
#542
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:27 PM
Concurred. It's great. Smart choice to isolate it from any musical accompaniment as well. The scent of death has never been so smelly in Bond.God, that QOS fight is so amazing. Perhaps the best hand-to-hand ever in a Bond movie. Thrilling, amazingly done, never confusing, and thoroughly engaged with an ironic narrative. I may be over-analyzing 45 seconds, but damn, what a scene.
#543
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:42 PM
God, that QOS fight is so amazing. Perhaps the best hand-to-hand ever in a Bond movie. Thrilling, amazingly done, never confusing, and thoroughly engaged with an ironic narrative. I may be over-analyzing 45 seconds, but damn, what a scene.
Ask me , In my honest opinion thats one of the finest action scene in cinema history.
#544
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:39 PM
#545
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:43 PM
Must add that I'm a fan of the QoS scene esp when hes feeling his pulse
Speaking of kermode has anyone read/heard his review of skyfall. He's highly analytical and a Bond fan. Fingers crossed hes a fan!
Edited by stone7, 24 October 2012 - 08:44 PM.
#546
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:45 PM
#547
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:23 PM
Negative review from IndieWire: http://www.indiewire...er-than-skyfall
They do, however, predict an Oscar nomination for Roger Deakins.
#548
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:28 PM
I think it was written by the director of Universal Soldier.Rotten Tomatoes has dropped to 95%. 42 fresh reviews and two rotten.
Negative review from IndieWire: http://www.indiewire...er-than-skyfall
#549
Posted 24 October 2012 - 10:07 PM
I think it was written by the director of Universal Soldier.
Rotten Tomatoes has dropped to 95%. 42 fresh reviews and two rotten.
Negative review from IndieWire: http://www.indiewire...er-than-skyfall

http://en.wikipedia....ier_(1971_film)
#550
Posted 24 October 2012 - 10:37 PM
Also, could anyone tell me what's so funny about...
#551
Posted 24 October 2012 - 10:53 PM
double o ego
One thing that has been constantly worrying about this movie is my fear of it not having intense fast paced quick action scenes
like this from Casino Royale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZLFfyzEUX8
or this from Quantum Of Solace
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4ZgXiHPXMs
Please put my fear to rest !
Jeez, I forgot how brutal that fight in QoS was....anyway, on the action front, hand to hand combat, you'll be pleased.
#552
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:01 PM
Interesting review. Pretty sure i'll disagree with every bit of it though, once I've seen the film.
Also, could anyone tell me what's so funny about...Spoiler
Don't spoilers bother you? Lol. You should wait to watch the movie but.....
#553
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:07 PM
Interesting review. Pretty sure i'll disagree with every bit of it though, once I've seen the film.
Also, could anyone tell me what's so funny about...Spoiler
Don't spoilers bother you? Lol. You should wait to watch the movie but.....Spoiler
I should have taken your advise and not read that, LOL.
#554
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:13 PM
God, that QOS fight is so amazing. Perhaps the best hand-to-hand ever in a Bond movie. Thrilling, amazingly done, never confusing
Never confusing? Just what weed are you smoking? I remember 2008 there were dozens of threads about how Slate died. Was it a shard of glass to the neck? Scissors the femoral artery?
4 years later and it's still an over-edited mess. Almost as inept as Paul Greengrass.
David Bordwell calls the style "intensified continuity." More like intensified incontinence.
#555
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:36 PM
#556
Posted 25 October 2012 - 12:44 AM
God, that QOS fight is so amazing. Perhaps the best hand-to-hand ever in a Bond movie. Thrilling, amazingly done, never confusing
Never confusing? Just what weed are you smoking? I remember 2008 there were dozens of threads about how Slate died. Was it a shard of glass to the neck? Scissors the femoral artery?
4 years later and it's still an over-edited mess. Almost as inept as Paul Greengrass.
Could not agree more. Just because the fight is more aggressive, which is largely because of the quick cuts, lack of music, and increased sound effects, in no way does it make it the best fight scene. A matter of fact, I firmly believe this is where the film began to slip. Slate was poorly explained and was merely made to die. I love comparing it to FRWL on the train. Small space, one on one and look at the difference. FRWL still feels intense but is crystal clear in continuity.
#557
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:03 AM
To Greengrass.
#558
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:14 AM
#559
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:14 AM
![[censored]](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/public/style_emoticons/default/censored.gif)
Can't I even like a fight scene without the contrarian onslaught, anymore?
#560
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:15 AM
#561
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:35 AM
Thread going down the drain. Fast.
The CR stairwell is let down by the terrible music.
Yes, quite. The Arnold kunundrum with manipulative, badly placed, cues. The guy is good for writing themes. And that´s about it, as important as that might be, of course.
#562
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:35 AM
Jesus. I thought the artery puncturing was obvious, and distinctly Flemingian. I had zero problems - ever - understanding that. You want a
up action scene? Go after the Port-Au-Prince harbour boat chase. How that ends makes literally zero sense.
Can't I even like a fight scene without the contrarian onslaught, anymore?
I can only speak for myself, but the only action sequence I found remotely enjoyable in QoS was the Tosca shootout, perhaps because the fragmentation was more clearly deliberate.
And I'm not really being contrarian, I assure you. I'd honestly prefer the hilariously limp Macnee + Moore fight scenes from AVTAK than the bulk of what's going on in QoS.
#563
Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:37 AM
Interesting review. Pretty sure i'll disagree with every bit of it though, once I've seen the film.
Also, could anyone tell me what's so funny about...Spoiler
Don't spoilers bother you? Lol. You should wait to watch the movie but.....Spoiler
That sounds really cool and , in a way, something out of a Moore film.
#564
Posted 25 October 2012 - 08:18 AM
God, that QOS fight is so amazing. Perhaps the best hand-to-hand ever in a Bond movie. Thrilling, amazingly done, never confusing
Never confusing? Just what weed are you smoking? I remember 2008 there were dozens of threads about how Slate died. Was it a shard of glass to the neck? Scissors the femoral artery?
4 years later and it's still an over-edited mess. Almost as inept as Paul Greengrass.
David Bordwell calls the style "intensified continuity." More like intensified incontinence.
Exactly. Its editing syntax is utterly out.
It’s been put together by someone who seems to not understand the language of film – cinematically illiterate even.
To give a clear example, early on there is a cut to the flick knife opening – who’s holding it?
For me, this sequence perfectly illustrates all that’s so very wrong with QoS. It attempts to be all modern and tough, but it’s just confusing. It’s very difficult to be involved in a film when you're just watching chaos without any attempt at cohesion. It's why I don't care about the story, anything that happens in it and every character involved. It really is a disaster of a film.
#565
Posted 25 October 2012 - 08:22 AM
As you said, it's the tone of the review that they use for a fresh/rotten review, not the final "score"Okay I'm confused a B rating is considered Rotten by Rotten Tomatoes? I know the tone of the review isn't gushing all over Skyfall but jeez a B is still a B!!!
Anyone know what he means by this?His gun drawn, 007 finds a fellow agent down and the baddie responsible on the lam. The baddie is always on the lam
#566
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:42 AM
#567
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:44 AM
#568
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:49 AM
#569
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:50 AM

#570
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:51 AM
A lifetime of watching old American movies perhaps.