'Think On Your Sins' (Major Spoilers)
#31
Posted 16 August 2012 - 10:43 AM
#32
Posted 16 August 2012 - 10:47 AM
I'll post anyway, as it contains a few different details... [again, read with caution]
#33
Posted 16 August 2012 - 10:49 AM
#34
Posted 16 August 2012 - 11:14 AM
#35
Posted 16 August 2012 - 11:17 AM
If this is true. This sounds heart wrenching and amazing.
And like the ending of a million other films.
#36
Posted 16 August 2012 - 11:31 AM
If this is true. This sounds heart wrenching and amazing.
And like the ending of a million other films.
Taking the bare bones description, you could say the same about the ending of any Bond film, even OHMSS.
In this case, I don’t agree at all. Very few films contain the finest actor of her generation playing a part that the audience has seen her play 7 times over so any years. And then at the climax of said film…
If done well, it could be a real stand out chapter in the series. I have confidence in Mendes to pull this off very well.
#37
Posted 16 August 2012 - 11:40 AM
I'm not entirely sure yet. Given what I know about various scenes and exchanges, I think we'll be left guessing about Mallory and his motives right the way to the end of the movie - and he could turn out to be less than trustworthy.So its pretty much confirmed then that
Spoiler
#38
Posted 16 August 2012 - 04:45 PM
Keep in mind that he could easily play a crooked M. In keeping with the times, the Bond series increasingly depicts a world of black-and-gray morality in which a dodgy M wouldn't be out of place. This might even have been the twist that hooked Fiennes : "I'll play M, but only if I can play him sinister."
#39
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:01 PM
#40
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:09 PM
...which, if mishandled, could be terribly melodramatic and angsty. On the flipside, it could provide an opportunity to show just how cold Bond really is. It could go too far in either direction. Bond shouldn't be breaking down, but he shouldn't be a full-on psychopath either. I can't wait to see how they do it.
#41
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:12 PM
#42
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:13 PM
#43
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:16 PM
#44
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:28 PM
I can't wait to see how they do it.
Indeed. Think about it: the whole plot of Skyfall stems from M cocking up some mission in her her past/screwing over Silva in some way- and let's not forget Silva's connection to Bond. Almost all the hell Bond is going to go through in Skyfall- from what i can gather- is because of M. "Bond's loyalty to M is tested" - that is the most interesting part of the plot to me.
So
#45
Posted 16 August 2012 - 07:57 PM
It might have worked better for me if it had made more sense, but who was Bond trying to fool by making it look like a robbery? The police had been bought off and were in control of the story, so no matter what he did, he was going to be blamed. I just never got the point.It kinda was. I thought it was interesting but also a bit over the top, too much shock effect.
#46
Posted 16 August 2012 - 08:16 PM
#47
Posted 16 August 2012 - 10:06 PM
I can't wait to see how they do it.
Indeed. Think about it: the whole plot of Skyfall stems from M cocking up some mission in her her past/screwing over Silva in some way- and let's not forget Silva's connection to Bond. Almost all the hell Bond is going to go through in Skyfall- from what i can gather- is because of M. "Bond's loyalty to M is tested" - that is the most interesting part of the plot to me.
SoSpoileris going to be great to watch. We don't know how he's going to react to that emotionally. Will it be a soap-opera moment, all tears and regret? Or will he just accept that it was inevitable from the beginning of the mission that there was a strong possibility that this could happen and be stoic about it? DC is great at both full blown emotion AND the understated stuff, so this is something i'm incredibly looking forward to.
The more I think about it, the more the 'soap-opera' moment is the way to go. I'm all for these movies in films, providing they're handled well. The thing is...
#48
Posted 16 August 2012 - 10:37 PM
Will it be a soap-opera moment, all tears and regret?
No more Lifetime channel bollox, please. Just fire a bazooka at the annoying old bag.
You owe it to the fans, EON.
#49
Posted 16 August 2012 - 11:08 PM
Will it be a soap-opera moment, all tears and regret?
No more Lifetime channel bollox, please. Just fire a bazooka at the annoying old bag.
You owe it to the fans, EON.
Some of us fans actually like her.
#50
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:05 AM
... While the fact that Bond is half Scottish is due to the film series, ...
I beg to differ. Andrew Bond being from Glencoe and his wife Monique being Swiss certainly *is* part of the literary canon.
Wow, Vauxhall and Shrublands, you do have very interesting information it seems...
I am afraid that I do not follow the boards as closely as I should, so forgive me if this has already been discussed to death, but what do you guys make of this line from Q,
#51
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:10 AM
... While the fact that Bond is half Scottish is due to the film series, ...
I beg to differ. Andrew Bond being from Glencoe and his wife Monique being Swiss certainly *is* part of the literary canon.
Now we're getting into a chicken-and-egg situation. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Fleming's original conception of Bond was just generically "British", with no explicit Scottish ancestry, and every indication that he was a garden-variety Englishman. Later, after Connery had made a good impression in the role, Fleming was inspired to specify the character's background as half-Scottish. So one could justifiably say that the film series is the source of Bond's Scottishness, although Fleming canonized it retroactively.
#52
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:35 AM
... While the fact that Bond is half Scottish is due to the film series, ...
I beg to differ. Andrew Bond being from Glencoe and his wife Monique being Swiss certainly *is* part of the literary canon.
Wow, Vauxhall and Shrublands, you do have very interesting information it seems...
I am afraid that I do not follow the boards as closely as I should, so forgive me if this has already been discussed to death, but what do you guys make of this line from Q,Spoiler?
#53
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:54 AM
Now we're getting into a chicken-and-egg situation. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Fleming's original conception of Bond was just generically "British", with no explicit Scottish ancestry, and every indication that he was a garden-variety Englishman. Later, after Connery had made a good impression in the role, Fleming was inspired to specify the character's background as half-Scottish. So one could justifiably say that the film series is the source of Bond's Scottishness, although Fleming canonized it retroactively.
Oh right then
#54
Posted 17 August 2012 - 02:02 AM
I am afraid that I do not follow the boards as closely as I should, so forgive me if this has already been discussed to death, but what do you guys make of this line from Q,Spoiler?Spoiler
Got it, thanks! Since I had only seen the line in script, I was not quite sure whether Q was talking to Bond, or about Bond (i.e.: was it this moment when Bond's loyalty was called into question?)
#55
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:35 PM
You are correct, but it was only added by Fleming because of Connery's portrayal, it was a sort nod to him adding the Scottish heritage. I wasn't suggesting the film makers made up his family history.
... While the fact that Bond is half Scottish is due to the film series, ...
I beg to differ. Andrew Bond being from Glencoe and his wife Monique being Swiss certainly *is* part of the literary canon.
Can't find the edit button; I should of finished reading the thread, Pussfeller explained it much better than I did.
#56
Posted 17 August 2012 - 02:19 PM
With writing, there are usually numerous reasons for things like this. For example - Fleming's own family came from Scotland. His ancestors were crofters from Perthshire who moved to Dundee to look for work in the late 19th century.
Also, the Fleming family once owned Dalness Lodge near Glencoe, perhaps that's another reason why Andrew Bond comes from that very part of Scotland.
#57
Posted 17 August 2012 - 02:53 PM
Connery's casting certainly was a factor, but to say it was the only reason is probably overstating it somewhat.
With writing, there are usually numerous reasons for things like this. For example - Fleming's own family came from Scotland. His ancestors were crofters from Perthshire who moved to Dundee to look for work in the late 19th century.
Also, the Fleming family once owned Dalness Lodge near Glencoe, perhaps that's another reason why Andrew Bond comes from that very part of Scotland.
True.
I've also found it hard to fathom why Fleming would throw in a bit of Scottish ancestry into Bond's background purely because of Connery. After all, didn't Fleming disapprove of Connery's casting, referring to him as an 'overgrown stunt man'...?
Back on topic, i've always liked Judi Dench's M. It was refreshing to see the M-Bond dynamic develop into something more than employer-employee. That said I do think after 7 films, this is probably the most appropriate time to leave. I find it hard to see their relationship surviving after the events of Skyfall.
#58
Posted 17 August 2012 - 07:38 PM
#59
Posted 17 August 2012 - 08:07 PM
Maybe it would be interesting if even the best agent like 007 can not prevent something he is trained for?
#60
Posted 17 August 2012 - 08:44 PM
Assuming that rumor is true, I love the idea of Bond and M's relationship ending on such a strange, ambiguous note, with Bond simply not knowing whether his aim was true.