That said, I don't even own a blu-ray player. But I'm tempted to make the purchase just for that lovely packaging...
Edited by iexpectu2die, 23 May 2012 - 11:11 PM.
Posted 23 May 2012 - 11:09 PM
Edited by iexpectu2die, 23 May 2012 - 11:11 PM.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:58 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:49 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:55 PM
Well, why not buy some three-disc DVD cases and slip the UE covers and the DVD and Blu-ray discs into those? It'd be a lot cheaper than buying them individually.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:33 PM
Lovely packaging ?
I don't even see a way of taking the discs out of the set without
scuffing them badly.
In my opinion, this is the worst bond box set ever. I'll stick to the UE dvds
and wait for the individual edition blu rays.
Also, I'd expect a "Craig era" box set, after the theatrical release of skyfall,
hopefully with some new content
Well, why not buy some three-disc DVD cases and slip the UE covers and the DVD and Blu-ray discs into those? It'd be a lot cheaper than buying them individually.
The only good thing about the bond 50 set, in my opinion, is the reasonable price.
Other than that, nothing.
I originally intended to buy it, but changed my mind now that we have details on the bonus content
and packaging.
I'm sure, sooner or later, there will be special offers on the individual blu rays, as it's been the case
with the past dvd editions
Edited by scaramunga, 24 May 2012 - 02:41 PM.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:38 PM
My feeling also. I want to see the films in high quality; at the end of the day that's really all that matters.For me, the special features are superfluous - all I care about is the films themselves.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:44 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:14 PM
I own all the films on DVD, but Dr. No through TWINE are all the "Special Edition" DVDs (w/ the original DVD transfers). I also am relatively new to Blu-Ray and don't own any of the Bond films in HD. So overall this is a great deal for me, the picture upgrade will be nice.
That said, I was a little disappointed like many when I found out the discs would be in a booklet and not individual cases. I do like the look of the set though and as long as it's not cheap quality I'm fine with it.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:30 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:22 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:40 PM
Am I the only one who thinks EON could have had Sean Connery personally deliver this set to people's homes and we would still be mad about it!? I mean complaining about the positioning of Lazenby and Dalton to all the extras (and more) being there just not actually listed in the press release? Seriously?
Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:10 PM
Am I the only one who thinks EON could have had Sean Connery personally deliver this set to people's homes and we would still be mad about it!? I mean complaining about the positioning of Lazenby and Dalton to all the extras (and more) being there just not actually listed in the press release? Seriously?
Haha! Very very true Arbogast.
As someone who worked hard on the OHMSS Special Features and provided material for them, I am disgusted by people who say they don't matter. You are entitled to your own opinion of course, but don't slag off the people that put forth the effort for them.
Also, EON isn't responsible for the Bluray decisions folks. They own the intellectual property and have to OK everything, but it is the studios (Sony & Fox) who set the budgets, create the releases and make decisions on content.
Am I the only one who thinks EON could have had Sean Connery personally deliver this set to people's homes and we would still be mad about it!? I mean complaining about the positioning of Lazenby and Dalton to all the extras (and more) being there just not actually listed in the press release? Seriously?
Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:14 PM
Am I the only one who thinks EON could have had Sean Connery personally deliver this set to people's homes and we would still be mad about it!? I mean complaining about the positioning of Lazenby and Dalton to all the extras (and more) being there just not actually listed in the press release? Seriously?
Haha! Very very true Arbogast.
As someone who worked hard on the OHMSS Special Features and provided material for them, I am disgusted by people who say they don't matter. You are entitled to your own opinion of course, but don't slag off the people that put forth the effort for them.
Also, EON isn't responsible for the Bluray decisions folks. They own the intellectual property and have to OK everything, but it is the studios (Sony & Fox) who set the budgets, create the releases and make decisions on content.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:41 PM
I did not slag you off at all. Your work was sensational, and your book on OHMSS is probably the best book ever written on a Bond film.
But do you really think that this box set is a wonderful achievement in itself? I repeat: why the blunder with the poses of Dalton and Lazenby? And why giving out the incomplete "complete list"? If EON has to OK everything - how could they OK this?
Posted 24 May 2012 - 06:06 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 06:53 PM
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:54 PM
I did not slag you off at all. Your work was sensational, and your book on OHMSS is probably the best book ever written on a Bond film.
But do you really think that this box set is a wonderful achievement in itself? I repeat: why the blunder with the poses of Dalton and Lazenby? And why giving out the incomplete "complete list"? If EON has to OK everything - how could they OK this?
I wasn't complaining about you - just the people who said the supplemental materials didn't mean anything - they just want the films.
No, I'm not defending the set - just pointing out that people's anger shouldn't be directed at Eon.
I'm really displeased that the material I provided for OHMSS is not being redone in HD.
I agree with you - the cover is pretty bad - and putting Lazenby and Dalton on the different colored backgrounds is bizarre. The actors should be in chronological order and all on the same color background.
And you question why Eon would OK such a thing. Well I've seen OHMSS marketing material from CBS/Fox with FRWL photos. I believe there is a Thunderball VHS release that has a NSNA shot on the back cover! Then you have the "geniuses" at Lowry who edited out the blood red color of the Thunderball shark scene because they didn't know the film well enough and thought the red was because the film hadn't been color corrected and therefore they made the water clear!
So I'm not happy about it, but in the grand scheme of things, that cover is pretty minor compared to some of the atrocities committed in previous home video releases.
Edited by larrythefatcat, 24 May 2012 - 07:54 PM.
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:08 PM
To be honest, though I agree they are entertaining, some of things said (especially by Terence Young) do stretch the truth, and are possibly libellous. You can get them if you want them.but I'd also like to somehow have the Criterion commentaries for DN, FRWL and GF on an "official" release instead of just relying on a rip from the LDs... I guess having some version of them is enough for me, but I just wish EON would own up to their existence.
Posted 25 May 2012 - 12:59 PM
Very sensible indeed!Am I the only one who thinks EON could have had Sean Connery personally deliver this set to people's homes and we would still be mad about it!? I mean complaining about the positioning of Lazenby and Dalton to all the extras (and more) being there just not actually listed in the press release? Seriously?
Posted 25 May 2012 - 01:10 PM
And don´t get me started on the poses of Lazenby and Dalton. While I can swallow that they did the least Bond films of all actors and were therefore positioned at the outer rim, did really nobody notice their weird poses before the first cover art was accepted? At least, that awkwardness has been corrected. The coloring ("hey, Lazenby and Dalton are not our golden boys", it seems to say) should also be corrected but... well, that would be not a dealbreaker for me.
Posted 25 May 2012 - 01:36 PM
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:14 PM
And don´t get me started on the poses of Lazenby and Dalton. While I can swallow that they did the least Bond films of all actors and were therefore positioned at the outer rim, did really nobody notice their weird poses before the first cover art was accepted? At least, that awkwardness has been corrected. The coloring ("hey, Lazenby and Dalton are not our golden boys", it seems to say) should also be corrected but... well, that would be not a dealbreaker for me.
I have an opposite opinion: Laz' and Dalton are the only 2 figures showing on the "50", which is celebrating the unprecedented 50th anniversary, therefore they actually have the best position on the box cover. They stand out.
Overall, I think we should not forget that we'll actually get a complete set of films in BR. What's more, although of course one may like it or not, they actually tried to come up with something imaginative and original instead of just piling the 22 movies side by side.
You see, it's all just a matter of opinion.
So I see no point in dismissing our pleasure and to revel in complaints, as so often on the Internet, about such trivial details as the colors on the cover...
Really, people, a sense of perspective here could be useful.
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:39 PM
Posted 25 May 2012 - 09:21 PM
Posted 25 May 2012 - 10:52 PM
Posted 27 May 2012 - 08:26 PM
Posted 30 May 2012 - 07:36 PM
I like the idea of doing them in book form instead of individual covers. While I was initially hoping for covers featuring the original poster art, this is nice because it's different. I like how all of the discs are unified and the box set looks pretty good overall. I'm glad I've held off on buying any of the currently available Blu Rays of the Bond films. I almost caved last year when my local HMV was selling them cheap but I figured they'd do a big release for the 50th. Luckily I was right, and this should look great on my Bond shelf.
Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:38 AM
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:22 PM
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:36 PM