#1171
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:48 AM
#1172
Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:05 PM
#1173
Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:54 PM
#1174
Posted 18 January 2012 - 04:50 PM
#1175
Posted 18 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
#1176
Posted 18 January 2012 - 06:01 PM
#1177
Posted 18 January 2012 - 06:04 PM
#1178
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:18 PM
#1179
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:22 PM
#1180
Posted 19 January 2012 - 02:58 AM
Such is life mon ami. Intricate, complex, and ultimatly, a bit unfair. Awareness is the aim. I´m aware of my unfounded expectations as a fan, so I don´t actually blame anyone else but me for the illusion. Not even Mr. Page, who undoubtedly has valid intell. And even better, if you are aware of all this, then you´re not afraid to up your expectations at all, being, of course, aware of all possible results and feelings that arise, such as disappointment. Cognizance my dear friend, cognizance.
In that case, people are just being unfair - they've convinced themselves that somebody is going to do something, and when that doesn't happen, they attack that somebody when that somebody hasn't done anything wrong.
people don´t get disappointed only by broken promises, they get disappointed over broken expectations, which is another matter entirely. You see, expectations aren´t anchored necessarily in induction by others. They brew out of one´s wishes.
Right on, univex! You hit that nail right on the sweet-spot.
Though there'll often be things which seem unfair in life, we can still do something about it within ourselves. Just as we can look back to times in our lives when we behaved poorly or thought very differently, and now recognise that, we can use all these little windows to help us understand how to realise fuller perceptions of the world/people or why another person may behave the same way. I find the more I recognise these things and logically consider the reasons, the more I find I like people and don't get angry, even when they are rude or in strong dissagreement with me etc.
On this life chat, I agree wholeheartedly. Although, when it comes to your aspirations, you should always aspire to the things that can be done. Things will go your way if your willing to put time into it. Life is a greedy bastard like that; you want something good, well prepare to make a lovely exchange of your time. Remember there's no such thing as a free lunch. I think it's silly to expect something purely based on a guess.
"I see what you did there, you cheeky little bastard"
#1181
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:32 PM
Graphic action.
Edited by Luigi Ferrari, 19 January 2012 - 08:32 PM.
#1182
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:33 PM
#1183
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:34 PM
#1184
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:36 PM
#1185
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:46 PM
#1186
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:51 PM
#1187
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:59 PM
Shame the picture is useless. Might as well have scribbled on a piece of paper, it tells us nothing.
#1188
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:09 PM
It looks like that could be an aeroplane, or a satellite, in the corner of the section at the bottom left of the clapperboard.
#1189
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:14 PM
What does 100mm mean? Does that mean it's an extreme close-up?
100mm just refers to the focal length. I'm assuming they're using prime lens, but they might be using it... for well, anything really. Just nothing wide. It gives you a more true to real life perspective than a 32mm for example.
#1190
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:21 PM
It means that they are using a telephoto lens. And it’s by far the narrowest lens they’ve shown us so far.
Explained simply: A 50mm is roughly what the human eye sees, every mm below that takes the image wider and wider. Every mm above takes it narrower, but closer onto an object from a distance.
#1191
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:21 PM
#1192
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:32 PM
#1193
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:33 PM
Well not quite.
It means that they are using a telephoto lens. And it’s by far the narrowest lens they’ve shown us so far.
Explained simply: A 50mm is roughly what the human eye sees, every mm below that takes the image wider and wider. Every mm above takes it narrower, but closer onto an object from a distance.
I agree with that, although, 100mm is barely telephoto. It depends on what you are shooting. They aren't using "zoom" lens, so they must be shooting something that's probably a little bit away from them, but not too much that they would need anything more.
Well not quite.
It means that they are using a telephoto lens. And it’s by far the narrowest lens they’ve shown us so far.
Explained simply: A 50mm is roughly what the human eye sees, every mm below that takes the image wider and wider. Every mm above takes it narrower, but closer onto an object from a distance.
I agree with that, although, 100mm is barely telephoto. It depends on what you are shooting. They aren't using "zoom" lens, so they are stuck with 100mm distance in the shot. They must be shooting something that's probably a little bit away from them, but not too much that they would need anything more.
#1194
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:34 PM
#1195
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:40 PM
It says something like "Feed M Locked" in the bottom corner.
Feed M and lock the cat flap?
#1196
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:40 PM
#1197
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:44 PM
Her (or his) secure satellite feed at MI6, I should think. This is another video wall scene by the look of it.
Yep. That's what it looks like.
#1198
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:49 PM
#1199
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:55 PM
Ahh yes, the obligatory glossy and high-tech MI6 scene to dazzle the rubes. I miss the days when M's office was a museum of underpaid British cunning and stodgy gemutlichkeit, rather than the engine room on the USS Bond.
Amen.
Maybe a return the the screens-behind-wail-panelling shtick from MR, AVTAK and GE? I liked that.
#1200
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:56 PM
Ahh yes, the obligatory glossy and high-tech MI6 scene to dazzle the rubes. I miss the days when M's office was a museum of underpaid British cunning and stodgy gemutlichkeit, rather than the engine room on the USS Bond.
Ditto. Nowadays its actually best if they never show MI6 HQ rather than show us all the OTT hi tech gadgetry.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Skyfall, photo, beard
Film Eras →
General Bond Film Discussion →
The 007th Minute: a review seriesStarted by Jim , 17 Nov 2013 Skyfall |
|
||
Film Eras →
Daniel Craig (2006 - ) →
Skyfall (2012) →
SPOILERS: Skyfall (2012) →
Shades of You Only Live Twice in Skyfall?Started by Colombo , 08 Jan 2012 Bond 23, Skyfall |
|