I don't particularly like it. Perhaps it grows on me, really don't know. That said I'm still not sold it's the real thing, regardless of the evidence.
Categorise that as MistrustFall?
(OK, that dun't really work).
Posted 07 October 2011 - 03:21 PM
I don't particularly like it. Perhaps it grows on me, really don't know. That said I'm still not sold it's the real thing, regardless of the evidence.
Posted 07 October 2011 - 03:44 PM
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 04:06 PM
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Probably not. Bond film named after an inanimate object would be novel, though.
Slightly melodramatic name for a house, innit? Always think naming houses is a bit gauche but IF (a big if) there's any possibility of this, I suppose it's a "fun" way to acknowledge Goldeneye (the inanimate object) if not GoldenEye (the inanimate Pierce Brosnan).
I mean, what next? Thunderclap Cottage? Bullet Lodge? The Killings?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 04:06 PM
I don't particularly like it. Perhaps it grows on me, really don't know. That said I'm still not sold it's the real thing, regardless of the evidence.
Categorise that as MistrustFall?
(OK, that dun't really work).
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Edited by Dustin, 07 October 2011 - 04:20 PM.
Posted 07 October 2011 - 04:15 PM
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 04:48 PM
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 04:49 PM
Might the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Oh, no. Please, no. Bond doesn't need a damn ancestral home. He's not the Prince of sodding Wales. Can't we please - for once - have a good old-fashioned unpretentiously entertaining James Bond film like, say, THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN? No origin story elements, no unnecessary (and unFlemingian) background details, no personal missions, no peeling back the layers.... Please.
Posted 07 October 2011 - 05:08 PM
Posted 07 October 2011 - 05:48 PM
"Zorin's Meals On Wheels". Take your own cutlery and help yourself to dessert.
What makes you think he knows? Zorin could be a caterer of some kind - that way, he'd know enough to know that cameras could be rolling, but not enough to know the title ...
So is Bond 23 Skyfall?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 07:47 PM
Yes. Give an interesting meaning to it and I´m sold. Just like with QOS or TWINE, or... Zorin, I know you for a while now, and you´ve always seemed like a realistic person, with some good reviews and comments over the years, but from your comments it does seem like you have some inside knowledge. Do you? Or are you playing with the fans? Just asking. CheersMight the naysayers be persuaded otherwise if the title SKYFALL was the name of Bond's ancestral home?
Posted 07 October 2011 - 10:24 PM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:02 AM
Yes, but it had the Fleming factor , I for one loved it as a title and found it to be very pragmatic not to care for the non-fan dilema of not knowing what it meant. My first reaction to Skyfall was...meh, ok for a video game. But give it context and I can love it. So, for one, I´ll wait and see. Who knows? It may turn out to be one of the most loved title (and plot) of the series, depending of what they make of it. I remember thinking DAD was nice, but then I cringed when Pierce uttered the line in the film. Cheers Mark.It's not great but, hey; it's only a title. I lived through Quantum of Solace.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:05 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:10 AM
Why would they be?If this is the title I hope this doesn't mean the days of Fleming titles are done.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:14 AM
The man just HOPES they aren´t and is stating his opinion. He can do that, I think. Unless you´re Richard Burton and he´s John Hurt And if that´s the case, bring in the rats Seriously now, I´m hoping that POAL will be used sometime in the future, it´s a nice one, as is Shatterhand (yes, I know you don´t like that one Shadow). Cheers Cap and QOS007Why would they be?
If this is the title I hope this doesn't mean the days of Fleming titles are done.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:25 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 03:27 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 03:38 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 06:17 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 06:29 AM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 09:13 AM
I'm slightly torn about what would be worse as the name behind the title - an apocalyptic plot scenario, or the villain being called Barry Skyfall.Well, if it is SKYFALL...
I like it because it sounds as if there is a lot at stake, like a "world could end"-scenario.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 09:33 AM
I guess there had to be a way of getting the logo in there.Found this fan effort on the net:
Posted 08 October 2011 - 10:54 AM
Dude, we've got Sam Mendes directing. No way in hell are we losing the "This time it's personal" aspect. Sadly.Oh, no. Please, no. Bond doesn't need a damn ancestral home. He's not the Prince of sodding Wales. Can't we please - for once - have a good old-fashioned unpretentiously entertaining James Bond film like, say, THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN? No origin story elements, no unnecessary (and unFlemingian) background details, no personal missions, no peeling back the layers.... Please.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 11:06 AM
I'm sceptical about the comments myself. When news first broke that BOND 23 was looking at a castle or manor home in Scotland, there was speculation that it would be "Bond's ancestral home" because Fleming gave Bond a distant Scottish heritage. I can understand production informing the owners of Castle Duntrune of what they intended for the actual scene - ie explosions, gunfire, etc. - but I can't work out why they would reveal details of the plot. I suspect Mrs. Malcolm did a little bit of independent research, found those early reports and took them as gospel truth.Oh, no. Please, no. Bond doesn't need a damn ancestral home. He's not the Prince of sodding Wales.
What about peeling back layers of a plot. One of the reasons why I think THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS is such a good film is because while he's a weak villain, Koskov is cunning enough to fool MI6 into doing his dirty work by staging his own defection and abduction. I would not complain if the plot of BOND 23 had Bond trying to work out a plan like this.no peeling back the layers.... Please.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 12:52 PM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:27 PM
Edited by JLaidlaw, 08 October 2011 - 01:28 PM.
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:48 PM
I'm surprised that with all of the negativity in the thread I'm one of only 12% of people to vote the title as Dreadful. So it must be growing on people?
I doubt this is a hoax, but I am clinging on to the hope it is. The thing giving me some solace is that many fans have said they'd like to see a film called 'GlobeFall' over the years. Coupled with the existence of Gardner's ColdFall, this sort of thing suggests a lack of imagination that could only come from either an internet fan, or a multi-million dollar movie studio.
But- if Mark Monitor registers websites with deliberate spelling mistakes (ie. Quotumofsolace.com) maybe SkyFall is actually a corruption of the actual title. Maybe Bond 23 will be 'Skive All' - in which James Bond 007 is sent on her majesty's secret service to investigate benefit fraud (in what the Daily Mail describes as 'an absolute masterpiece')
Posted 08 October 2011 - 02:02 PM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 02:10 PM
Posted 08 October 2011 - 03:31 PM