Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Future Bond Film Directors


343 replies to this topic

#211 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 07 September 2012 - 11:56 PM

I´d love the idea of a female director for Bond. And Bigelow definitely knows how to handle tension and action.


Agreed. It's weird that there hasn't been a female director in all these years. And she'd be perfect.

#212 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 08 September 2012 - 03:39 AM

I wont be surprised if she directs Bond24.

And she has an Oscar.

#213 Golden Claw

Golden Claw

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 219 posts
  • Location:Ind-yeah!

Posted 03 October 2012 - 06:46 AM

Female director = Kathryn Bigelow?? Is that the only name that comes to mind? I don't think the producers would choose an American director for Bond.

Aren't there any worthy female directors from Britain or the Commonwealth? I read somewhere that Ralph Fiennes' sisters Martha Fiennes & Sophie Fiennes are directors, though I've not seen anything of theirs.

#214 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 13 October 2012 - 03:31 PM

Has anyone suggested Ralph Fiennes as a future Bond director? Perhaps not necessarily for BOND 24, but given time.

Also, I wouldn't be particularly shocked if someone told me that one day Daniel Craig will direct a Bond movie. His level of involvement in the film-making process already seems more than one may expect.

#215 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 13 October 2012 - 05:45 PM

Not yet, I've yet to see 'Coriolanus' by Riennes.

#216 Twingolot

Twingolot

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 39 posts
  • Location:France

Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:55 PM

Has anyone suggested Ralph Fiennes as a future Bond director? Perhaps not necessarily for BOND 24, but given time.

Also, I wouldn't be particularly shocked if someone told me that one day Daniel Craig will direct a Bond movie. His level of involvement in the film-making process already seems more than one may expect.


Me neither, although I don't think Craig would direct especially a Bond movie. If he wants to direct a movie, guess he would start with some little project like Connery's 1973 "The Offence".

Speaking of Bond directors, I think Danny Boyle could have a chance. But I wouldn't like it.

Kathryn Bigelow could be a very interesting choice now. And of course, there's Matthew Vaughn...

#217 TheManwiththeWaltherPPK

TheManwiththeWaltherPPK

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 147 posts

Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:11 AM

I want Mendes as long as we can have him. My concern with Bigelow is that she might not get Bond and either take the project too seriously or treat it as a joke. What is so excited about all the reviews about Skyfall is that it seems that Mendes knows what makes Bond so enduring and knows how to build and play with the formula without losing the spark that makes a good Bond movie special.

#218 bey-columbo

bey-columbo

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Montpellier, France

Posted 16 October 2012 - 01:10 AM

Christopher Nolan of course.

Matthew Vaughn, why not....

Danny Boyle ? British and director of several excellent movies, creator of the Olympic Games ceremony ?

Pierre Morel ? I don't think so. We need directors more interested by the artistic aspects.

David Cronenberg ? Very good director but too dark for James Bond. He made The Fly and other horror movies.... and when this is not horror movies, this still dark.

David Fincher is more likely to make a Bond like FRWL or OHMSS, where the investigate and the suspense are important.

Ridley Scott, british, but is he adapted for a Bond movie ?

Edited by bey-columbo, 16 October 2012 - 01:13 AM.


#219 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:59 PM

Enough here for Mendes fans to feel hopeful: http://www.guardian....ct-bond-skyfall

#220 bey-columbo

bey-columbo

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Montpellier, France

Posted 21 October 2012 - 01:12 AM

If Skyfall is a masterpiece, and maybe better than Casino Royale, why not !

Just like Terence Young many years before him.

I don't want to talk about Guy Hamilton, because Goldfinger was brillant, but DAF, LALD and TMWTGG are the less goods, from my point of view.

Edited by bey-columbo, 21 October 2012 - 01:12 AM.


#221 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 01:25 AM

Enough here for Mendes fans to feel hopeful: http://www.guardian....ct-bond-skyfall

If SKYFALL is splendid, by all means, he should come back. It would be absolutely lovely to have a director stick around for more than one installment.

#222 seawolfnyy

seawolfnyy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4763 posts
  • Location:La Rioja

Posted 21 October 2012 - 06:56 AM

I don't want to talk about Guy Hamilton, because Goldfinger was brillant, but DAF, LALD and TMWTGG are the less goods, from my point of view.


Directors can't completely fix a broken screenplay. DAF was doomed before it ever got started and TMWTGG is just a mess. I wouldn't say the directing was bad with any of them so much as the scripts were bad.

#223 Redneck007

Redneck007

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 44 posts
  • Location:North Carolina, USA

Posted 24 October 2012 - 01:46 PM

Matthew Vaughn would be superb.

#224 Judo chop

Judo chop

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7461 posts
  • Location:the bottle to the belly!

Posted 24 October 2012 - 06:07 PM

A Matthew Vaughn Bond product strikes me as too unpredictable. Naturally every director is unpredictable to some extent – only some more than others. Vaughn doesn’t right away strike me as the optimum choice. As if Mendes ever did…

And now I will unhitch my jaw to make way for my hat and boldly declare, before evening seeing SKYFALL, that I hope for more intimate Craig/Mendes collaborations.

#225 Armand Fancypants

Armand Fancypants

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 121 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:36 PM

Vaughn has withdrawn from directing X-Men: Days of Future Past.

My thoughts immediately went to EON having approached him. I wouldn't argue.

#226 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:45 PM

I wonder who will direct the sequel. I am interested in Vaughn directing a Bond film and think it would be great.

#227 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:59 PM

Vaughn has withdrawn from directing X-Men: Days of Future Past.

My thoughts immediately went to EON having approached him. I wouldn't argue.


Or maybe Craig saw him at a party and offered him the job.

#228 Single-O-Seven

Single-O-Seven

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1323 posts
  • Location:Toronto, ON, Canada

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:12 PM


Vaughn has withdrawn from directing X-Men: Days of Future Past.

My thoughts immediately went to EON having approached him. I wouldn't argue.


Or maybe Craig saw him at a party and offered him the job.


An article on IGN states he is instead directing a film for Fox called The Secret Service. Bryan Singer is allegedly being asked to take over directing duties for X-Men.

#229 CLS

CLS

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 6 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:13 PM

If Skyfall is as great as advertised, I'm all for Mendes getting another shot. But, I'd be lying if I didn't want Nolan to really do one with Craig. Frankly, for this viewer, it needs to happen next...as in make the announcement already.

But, apart of me believes he'll never do one, no matter how much he says he wants to do one. The reason is the Dark Knight Trilogy and Inception. Those four films have Bond written all over them. He might feel that he's repeating himself if he does Bond.

Still, Bond, Craig, and Nolan...yeah, let's get that done EON.

#230 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:18 PM

I don't feel the need to see Michael Caine, Tom Hardy (unless he played a villain in a film without Nolan), Marion Cottilard (beautiful, but talentless), Joseph gordon-Levitt, Ken Watanabe, and Hans Zimmer.

Keep Nolan and co. away from the film.

#231 CLS

CLS

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 6 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:20 PM

It's not like EON won't have a say in the casting of this film. I don't think Nolan's that dogmatic. He'll be in service of the franchise. Nothing more.

Still don't understand the venom towards Nolan directing in a franchise he clearly loves.

#232 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:25 PM

The fact he cast's almost 35-50% of the same actors is annoying. He's overrated, overhyped, and a bit of a hack. If anything he'll make a movie that's overly long, limited action scenes, too many characters that in the end serve no purpose to the plot.

#233 CLS

CLS

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 6 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:26 PM

The fact he cast's almost 35-50% of the same actors is annoying. He's overrated, overhyped, and a bit of a hack. If anything he'll make a movie that's overly long, limited action scenes, too many characters that in the end serve no purpose to the plot.


Clearly, you're not a fan. Agree to disagree then.

Edited by CLS, 25 October 2012 - 10:26 PM.


#234 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:29 PM

Still don't understand the venom towards Nolan directing in a franchise he clearly loves.


Because he's completely wrong for it.

#235 CLS

CLS

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 6 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:29 PM

By the way, the guy that makes Memento, the Prestige, and Inception is not a hack. That just doesn't apply.

Still don't understand the venom towards Nolan directing in a franchise he clearly loves.


Because he's completely wrong for it.


In what way? And Mendes was? Nobody had him on the radar until it was actually confirmed that he was doing it.

Edited by CLS, 25 October 2012 - 10:30 PM.


#236 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:37 PM

A fan of what, Nolan?

Let's see ever since The Dark Knight, Nolan's fan base has their heads so far up his [censored] it crazy (not saying you do) Memento is fantastic, great performances by Joe Pantoliano and Guy Pearce. The Prestige is good, but not a masterpiece. Inception, I like it, but it gets WAY To much credit and it's only a good for one or two play-throughs.

The Dark Knight Is a good film, but it's quite "meh". The Dark Knight Rises is a joke.

#237 Armand Fancypants

Armand Fancypants

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 121 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:49 PM

The fact he cast's almost 35-50% of the same actors is annoying.


Hmm, I've heard a lot of bitching about Nolan, but this is a new reason as to why he's a bad filmmaker.

Quick, someone tell John Ford, Robert Altman, and Akira Kurosawa that they're [censored]house because they have a stock acting company.

#238 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:55 PM

Tom Hooper.

Danny Boyle.

#239 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 25 October 2012 - 11:00 PM


The fact he cast's almost 35-50% of the same actors is annoying.


Hmm, I've heard a lot of bitching about Nolan, but this is a new reason as to why he's a bad filmmaker.

Quick, someone tell John Ford, Robert Altman, and Akira Kurosawa that they're [censored]house because they have a stock acting company.


Did I say that was THE MAIN reason he's a bad filmmaker? It's simply an annoyance. Casting one actor repeatedly is one thing, in fact it's nothing. Casting almost half the cast from your previous work in your next film is an annoyance. This is 'The Dark Knight Rises' not 'The Dark Inception Rises' Please do not put words in my mouth pal.

#240 Armand Fancypants

Armand Fancypants

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 121 posts

Posted 25 October 2012 - 11:29 PM

I guess I don't quite get why it's an annoyance. Were you really watching Tom Hardy in TDKR and thinking "Oh hey, there's whatsisface from Inception"?