Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Who do you want for Bond 7? * POLL ADDED*


4014 replies to this topic

Poll: In lieu of proper news, let's have an opinion...

Do you think Daniel Craig will return for BOND 25?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Now that's out of the way, do you WANT Daniel Craig to return as Bond?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Suppose Daniel Craig will be back as 007, for how many films would you wish to see him back?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Should Daniel Craig not return as James Bond, would you want the current timeline continued?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#421 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 30 December 2010 - 04:15 AM

In fact the only previous bond actor with strong formal acting background was Dalton, whom the majority of posters here hate (BTW, Dalton is my 2nd favorite Bond).


Actually I find that Dalton is much more appreciated on these boards than you think, most members here don't hate him and he is given much more respect than Brosnan(Dalton is my 3rd favorite Bond).

Also, Dalton is not the only Bond with strong formal acting background. In fact Lazenby is the only Bond without a strong acting background. Dalton may have the most stage experience, but Connery, Moore, Brosnan and Craig all have prior stage experience. Roger Moore attended Royal Academy of Dramatic Art and has had the longest and most successful career of any Bond actor prior to being cast as 007. Moore had a 28 year film career prior to Bond while Dalton had a 20 career (Brosnan 15 years and Craig 10 years). Craig had also been nominated and won several awards prior to his casting as Bond.

#422 Safari Suit

Safari Suit

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5099 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 30 December 2010 - 10:33 AM


So he's playing a character that doesn't even get a name in some low-rent looking Danny McBride comedy? WOW, first Holby City and now this? There's no stopping the megastar that is Noah Huntley! Somebody call EON right NOW, because we need to get rid of this Craig nobody who's off doing some rubbish with losers like Spielberg and Fincher, and lock Huntley into an 8 picture contract while he's so RED HOT and all.

I have to laugh at you guys who think a Bond actor needs to be a Shakespearean thespian. All he has to do is look good in a tuxedo, have a decent speaking voice, be able to sell action scenes, and have 'some' acting talent. WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU GUYS?!!.... Connery's best acting was NOT his Bond movies, AND he was an unknown when he was first chosen for the role. Moore has never been known as a great actor, yet he was a great Saint and would have been a pretty good Bond had he not clowned it up! Brosnan has never been nominated for an Oscar, and Lazenby was a male model whom, in retrospect, enjoys the majority opinion for having been a decent Bond in his one appearance.

In fact the only previous bond actor with strong formal acting background was Dalton, whom the majority of posters here hate (BTW, Dalton is my 2nd favorite Bond).

You guys need to get down from that high horse and walk with the rest of us.

SHEESH!!!


There's a difference between "not Oscar calibre" and Your Highness

Though in fairness Your Highness is directed by someone somwhat noteworthy (David Gordon Green), who I guess is just having an off day...

#423 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 30 December 2010 - 12:14 PM

All he has to do is look good in a tuxedo, have a decent speaking voice, be able to sell action scenes, and have 'some' acting talent. WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU GUYS?!!....

Er, no - that is not all that a Bond actor needs to have. He needs a vast gamut of other qualities - some of which have nothing to do with acting.

And since when did the opposite of bad shoddy acting in a hospital soap equal Shakespearean?!

#424 sthgilyadgnivileht

sthgilyadgnivileht

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1854 posts

Posted 30 December 2010 - 01:20 PM



In fact the only previous bond actor with strong formal acting background was Dalton, whom the majority of posters here hate (BTW, Dalton is my 2nd favorite Bond).


Actually I find that Dalton is much more appreciated on these boards than you think, most members here don't hate him and he is given much more respect than Brosnan(Dalton is my 3rd favorite Bond).


I agree - Dalton is appreciated.


All he has to do is look good in a tuxedo, have a decent speaking voice, be able to sell action scenes, and have 'some' acting talent. WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU GUYS?!!....


I think I understand the overall point you are making in your post and to some extent I know what you mean - no one is going to get the OSCAR for playing Bond. However, I have the feeling Guy Hamilton, John Glen and Martin Campbell would disagree with you here. Finding someone with the ability to carry a 007 film on their shoulders and take the audience with them for two hours is not something any actor can do and surely requires a lot more than 'some' acting talent.

My own view is there are very few actors capable of playing 007 and furthermore they don't come around very often.

#425 George88

George88

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 90 posts

Posted 30 December 2010 - 03:45 PM

I have to laugh at you guys who think a Bond actor needs to be a Shakespearean thespian.


I cannot see, reading this back, anyone making any such point.

All he has to do is look good in a tuxedo, have a decent speaking voice, be able to sell action scenes, and have 'some' acting talent.


I think it involves a bit more than this.

My own view is there are very few actors capable of playing 007 and furthermore they don't come around very often.


I agree.

#426 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 30 December 2010 - 04:47 PM

no one is going to get the OSCAR for playing Bond. However, I have the feeling Guy Hamilton, John Glen and Martin Campbell would disagree with you here.


Well, Craig was nominated for a BAFTA for his performance in CR.

#427 Frankie

Frankie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 624 posts

Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:48 PM

There's a difference between "not Oscar calibre" and Your Highness

Though in fairness Your Highness is directed by someone somwhat noteworthy (David Gordon Green), who I guess is just having an off day...

So,.... you have not seen the movie yet and you have made a judgement against it already. Says a lot about your judgement of talent and other qualifications on the topic of this thread! :rolleyes:

#428 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:11 PM

I just saw Inception for the first time last night and now I can sort of see why people are thinking Tom Hardy would be a good candidate. The only previous film I remember him from is Star Trek (I did see Layer Cake, but don't really remember him in it).

#429 Frankie

Frankie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 624 posts

Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:20 PM

I just saw Inception for the first time last night and now I can sort of see why people are thinking Tom Hardy would be a good candidate. The only previous film I remember him from is Star Trek (I did see Layer Cake, but don't really remember him in it).

It's funny how inception made me convinced he is no Bond.

#430 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 30 December 2010 - 11:03 PM

I just saw Inception for the first time last night and now I can sort of see why people are thinking Tom Hardy would be a good candidate. The only previous film I remember him from is Star Trek (I did see Layer Cake, but don't really remember him in it).

I just recently realized that it was him in Layer Cake as Clarkie when I've seen the film numerous times in the past 3 years or so. I agree, he is a good candidate.

#431 Safari Suit

Safari Suit

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5099 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 31 December 2010 - 10:24 AM


There's a difference between "not Oscar calibre" and Your Highness

Though in fairness Your Highness is directed by someone somwhat noteworthy (David Gordon Green), who I guess is just having an off day...

So,.... you have not seen the movie yet and you have made a judgement against it already. Says a lot about your judgement of talent and other qualifications on the topic of this thread! :rolleyes:


Yes, because I have seen the trailer and it is shockingly awful. It is possible it could be wonderful and they somehow managed to fudge cutting a trailer very, very badly. Still I believe judging a movie you have not seen is fairly common, as that is how people pick and choose which films they wath rather than blowing all their money on every film that comes out.

#432 Frankie

Frankie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 624 posts

Posted 31 December 2010 - 09:49 PM

Yes, because I have seen the trailer and it is shockingly awful. It is possible it could be wonderful and they somehow managed to fudge cutting a trailer very, very badly. Still I believe judging a movie you have not seen is fairly common, as that is how people pick and choose which films they wath rather than blowing all their money on every film that comes out.

Whatever!

I'm sure glad some the posters here are not going to be picking the next Bond actor.

#433 Safari Suit

Safari Suit

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5099 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 01 January 2011 - 02:08 PM

Oddly enough, so am I

#434 Sebastian Tombs

Sebastian Tombs

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 117 posts
  • Location:Washington, DC

Posted 04 January 2011 - 08:22 PM

Elsewhere on the 'net, I came across someone making a case for David Duchovny as the next Bond...

Personally, it makes me want to scream and hide under the couch.

#435 talos7

talos7

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 83 posts
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:31 PM

For those who support Fassbender, I think he would be a fine choice, Check out how his character, Magneto, in the X Men prequal, is described by the films director.

The best way of describing it is X-Men meets Bond, with a little bit of Thirteen Days thrown in for good measure. It’s set in the ’60s, and I basically molded a young Magneto on a young Sean Connery. He’s the ultimate spy — imagine Bond, but with superpowers.
http://collider.com/...143/#more-72143


on a side note, I see where Fassbender is also playing the part of Mr. Rockchester in a new production of Jane Eyre. In 1983 Timothy Dalton played the part. All of this may add up to nothing but he does appear to have the right pedigree.

Edited by talos7, 23 January 2011 - 08:34 PM.


#436 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2011 - 01:35 PM

How about Jim Sturgess? He's a young British actor on his way up, with roles in this and that - he's in Peter Weir's THE WAY BACK, and will soon be starring alongside Anne Hathaway in the screen adaptation of David Nicholls' bestseller ONE DAY, a flick that I'm sure will be a romcom smash and put his name on the map.

The reason I mention Sturgess is that I've just seen him as the lead in Philip Ridley's remarkable Brit horror yarn HEARTLESS, and was very impressed by his performance. It isn't a Bondian role by any means, but then neither were most of Craig's prior to CASINO ROYALE. I don't think I've seen Sturgess in anything else, but I suspect that he's on the brink of real success and acclaim, just as Craig was in the few years before Eon knocked on his door. Craig was an actor who was going places with or without 007, and the same is true of Sturgess, I think.

Does Sturgess have the looks for Bond? Maybe. In some pics, he looks vaguely like a young Dalton. On the other hand, I'd say he currently looks a little too boyish and babyfaced. I gather he's thirty, but could pass for younger. So I don't think he'd quite suit the part now, but once he reaches his late thirties/early forties (by which time, presumably, Craig will be out of the picture and Eon will be looking to appoint his successor), he may have aged quite nicely, filling out a bit and looking a little more rugged.

Anyway, any thoughts on this chap?

#437 Liparus

Liparus

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 46 posts

Posted 26 January 2011 - 01:39 PM

How about Jim Sturgess? I don't think he'd quite suit the part now,
Anyway, any thoughts on this chap?

Posted Image

Not now and I hope : never. In his "thirties or forties" ? :rolleyes: I'll still look like a nerd !

#438 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2011 - 01:50 PM

Yeah, like every pre-CASINO ROYALE photo of Craig was Bondian.

Back in the day, I remember people putting up plenty of goofy, unflattering or otherwise inappropriate pics of Craig as "proof" that he was the wrong choice for Bond.

Not that I'm saying that Sturgess would be perfect for Bond now, though - quite the opposite. I'm just wondering aloud whether he has some potential for the future.

#439 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2011 - 02:19 PM

Yeah, like every pre-CASINO ROYALE photo of Craig was Bondian.


A few were though, whereas Sturgess doesn't have any.

#440 Santa

Santa

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6445 posts
  • Location:Valencia

Posted 26 January 2011 - 07:01 PM

How about Jim Sturgess?


Anyway, any thoughts on this chap?

I like him. I'm not sure about liking him as Bond yet but I think anyone with any common sense would realise that most good actors are capable of transforming themselves into different characters, that's the point, so pictures of what he's done in the past are far from a reliable indicator - let's be honest, Brosnan so looked the part in that way but as far as I'm concerned that turned out to be a disaster. I'd be interested to see him buffed up a bit and a few years older. That could work for me.

#441 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 27 January 2011 - 07:06 AM

He's a moderate actor at best, but I just don't see him as 007.

#442 Sharpe

Sharpe

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 63 posts
  • Location:In the Aston

Posted 27 January 2011 - 07:31 AM

Michael Fassbender would be my first choice at the moment.

But there's probably many actors i'm not at all aware of.

#443 Alessandra

Alessandra

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 768 posts
  • Location:Milan, Italy

Posted 28 January 2011 - 01:45 AM

Alessandra cara, hadh't seen you a post of yours for ages!

I 'm not actually saying I want him for the part, but shouldn't we keep Adam Croasdell in mind as a potential Bond?

http://www.play-mag....tivisions-bond/

Apart from the obvious connection (see link above), he played an MI6 (I think) agent in Poirrot's 'Cat among the pidgeons', and I remember that when I saw it, I googled him immediately (which probably means he gave me a good impression). I haven't (obviously) seen him in Eastenders or anything else. Does anyone here have an opinion?


Well hi there! I really don't post here at all anymore, but the idea of Henry Cavill becoming Bond n. 7 really tickles my Bond girl appetite :D This guy you suggested is I believe someone to bear in mind. He's got the looks, I've only seen some footage of him in action so I can't really say if he's great or not, but he at least doesn't seem bad, which is a good start. :D

As far as the acting someone mentioned. Sorry to say, but I believe Cavill is a better actor than Craig. I don't see all this great acting in Craig at all. He seems like the average Bond actor to me. Cavill has had solid Shakespearean training ever since he was 12. Plus Cavill has got the perfect looks to be Bond. And, as others said, Bond actors aren't supposed to get Oscars anyway. That said, I also disagree with some very underplayed resume that has been made about his career.

A)Cavill was a LEAD in the Tudors, he and Rhys Meyers were the only two actors who lasted the whole run of the series, 4 seasons. And most definitely they were the leading duo B)The show was very successful, and broadcast not only in the US but worldwide. It wasn't some minor show. And it garnered him very good popularity in the US. C)Cavill's outing in the Woody Allen movie was never meant to be a huge thing, but he certainly was a fundamental part of the story in Whatever Works in terms of plot. And most importantly D) He has two movies being released this year "The Cold Light of Day" where he is the lead, and his co-stars are Bruce Willis and Sigourney Weaver (and it's an action movie where he uncovers a conspiracy as his family is kidnapped while they are on vacation in Spain) and "Immortals". While "Cold Light of Day" may be just a regular action flick, nothing special (though I sure hope it turns out to be good, I've seen some of the stunts Cavill did himself as well as some of the car chase and shooting scenes and they look GOOD), "Immortals" is a big production and he's the lead of that one, too. (It will be released on Nov. 11) I've read and heard quite a few comments both from the director and from people directly involved in production stating this will definitely cement him as the new leading man in Hollywood. So I think if anyone wants more proof about him as a leading man, this should do. But I don't think EON wants that. They go for relatively unknown actors and the fact Cavill hasn't yet been in any big budget movie (and Immortals will be that movie) plays to his advantage, not to his disadvantage in my opinion. I am in fact worried that these two movies may make him become too popular too quickly and that would be a disadvantage.

Oh, and about height. Cavill is 6' 1'', not 6. (1 mt 85 cm). And no, Craig isn't 5 ft 10. Met him in person, he's definitely under 5' 10' seen as I was that tall in my heels and he wasn't taller than me, quite the opposite. And he isn't physically imposing at all. He's extremely thin. It's all camera work. And the fact he pumped himself up at the gym for CR. That said, I don't see him as physically imposing at all even on camera, so I think it's a mere matter of perception. I agree with whoever said that so far, the most physically imposing actor in the role was Timothy Dalton.

That said, Campbell wanted Cavill for CR and I think it would have made more sense to have a rookie angle with Cavill rather than Craig. The fact actors for Bond are often approached when they're young and then picked for the role afterward makes me confident that Cavill does have a good chance of becoming Bond #7. He sure had what was needed to be Bond seen as he was the last one standing vs Craig. I, for one, really hope that he will be Bond #7. I will be fully in love with Bond again, should that happen :D Surely there will be other contenders that may do well in the role, but I strongly feel he is the perfect fit.

ETA:

Nobody's mentioned that Cavill already has two roles filmed and ready to come out in 2011. He plays the lead role of Theseus in the Greek myth saga Immortals co-starring Mickey Rourke and John Hurt. He also has the lead in thriller The Cold Light Of Day co-starring Bruce Willis and Sigourney Weaver.

This doesn't seem to me to be an actor whose career is going nowhere who is stuck in the same place as five years ago. I think his career has been undersold in some of the previous posts.


Thank you! You summarized it better than I did. I DID mention he has The Cold light of Day coming up in my previous post, but didn'g get into Immortals. Anyway some posts just overlooked the fact and yeah, definitely undersold his career.

Edited by Alessandra, 28 January 2011 - 02:22 AM.


#444 Fro

Fro

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 741 posts

Posted 30 January 2011 - 05:31 PM

Cavill just landed the role of Superman, so I think that would knock his chances down a few pegs
http://www.deadline....as-new-superman

#445 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 30 January 2011 - 05:38 PM

Cavill just landed the role of Superman, so I think that would knock his chances down a few pegs
http://www.deadline....as-new-superman


Yeah I'd say that strikes him off EON's list. Ha - funnily enough, a lot of people said because he auditioned for Bond once, he's "due" the next time round. Well it looks like that worked for Superman too, he was originally lined up to star in the McG Superman before it fell apart in the early 00s.

Still, good for him, he finally got a huge gig after auditioning for just about everything.

#446 Garth007

Garth007

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 598 posts
  • Location:La Plata, MO

Posted 30 January 2011 - 05:45 PM

I was watching Hot Fuzz the other day call me crazy, but I actually Thought Simon Pegg would be great as Bond. Just needs to bulk up alittle more than he was in the movie. I think he could pull it off easily. Just cause he's a comedian doensn't mean he can't do bond.

#447 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 30 January 2011 - 05:59 PM

Cavill just landed the role of Superman, so I think that would knock his chances down a few pegs
http://www.deadline....as-new-superman


I would say more than a few pegs, probably totally puts him out of the running.

#448 Matt_13

Matt_13

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5969 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 30 January 2011 - 06:11 PM

He was too obvious a choice anyway.

#449 smudge76

smudge76

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 153 posts
  • Location:Where i get paid to be.

Posted 30 January 2011 - 11:37 PM

Tom Hardy would be a decent shout after Craig. I think he could the role justice.

#450 Doctor Whom

Doctor Whom

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 108 posts
  • Location:Omaha, Nebraska

Posted 31 January 2011 - 01:04 AM

Cavill just landed the role of Superman, so I think that would knock his chances down a few pegs
http://www.deadline....as-new-superman

Well, I guess I have to scratch him off the list.