Thoughts on the game
#61
Posted 16 December 2008 - 05:19 PM
#62
Posted 17 December 2008 - 03:34 AM
#63
Posted 17 December 2008 - 06:47 PM
I have played the PS3 version and it's brilliant.
#64
Posted 18 December 2008 - 05:54 AM
#65
Posted 18 December 2008 - 11:10 PM
I wonder how many of you are/were experienced PC gamers (more specifically first person shooter PC gamers)... because really, this game plays and feels like it was made around the year 2002...
Not that experienced, I'll admit.
#66
Posted 19 December 2008 - 06:17 PM
#67
Posted 29 December 2008 - 02:40 AM
Yeah, it's clear Treyarch put a stronger effort in Call of Duty: World at War than this game, but it's not terrible. It's also clear this was just gonna be a CR game, and the QOS stuff was added later (probably insisted by Activision). The singleplayer's competent but overall disjointed since you need to see the movies to understand the game; but the multiplayer's half-decent.
I've been playing this game since I got it Christmas day. I'm not quite finished with SP yet, but I've been pouring hours into multiplayer. It understands what it wants to do, at least. A few more months in the oven would've made this game great. But it's better than EA's last efforts, and it's up to par with Agent Under Fire. But it doesn't surpass Nightfire as my favorite Bond game, IMO.
#68
Posted 02 January 2009 - 01:59 PM
#69
Posted 02 January 2009 - 07:08 PM
Completed the Opera House level last night, the part where you're using the sniper rifle was challenging.
#70
Posted 03 January 2009 - 12:48 AM
Does it look good?
#71
Posted 04 January 2009 - 02:01 AM
#72
Posted 09 March 2009 - 03:17 PM
#73
Posted 10 March 2009 - 01:46 PM
It's probably going up on Ebay in the coming weeks unless I can somehow get back into the mood soon.
Edited by eddychaput, 10 March 2009 - 01:47 PM.
#74
Posted 11 March 2009 - 04:33 AM
Anyways, the game was WAY too short, but the action is great.
The two other things that I didn't like were the takedown system (I got Quantum on a PC) and the cover system (It's too repetitive).
#75
Posted 29 March 2009 - 03:24 PM
But what sinking it down is that the game is too short and have very little replay value. It feels like the developer doesn't put so much effort into the game. Overall I give it a 3/5.
Thinking about getting the 360 version, which I hope is a little better.
#76
Posted 16 April 2009 - 12:33 AM
#77
Posted 20 April 2009 - 05:11 PM
It's just so damned short (but then again, no shorter than original GoldenEye) and often repetitive. Otherwise, a nice adaptation. Attach driving and versatile gameplay to this, and you've got the best Bond game ever.
Oh, and the story is incoherent, poorly presented, and (in the case of, specifically, Quantum), has absolutely no point. Whatsoever.
#78
Posted 21 April 2009 - 02:38 PM
#79
Posted 22 April 2009 - 01:47 AM
I'm still not sold completely, due to the golden opportunities missed. The Embassy shootout is by far the most "lends itself to a video game-type" sequence in a Craig film thus far, and it's not even included. And yet the Miami airport is expanded to several levels of running around offices and interiors. Puzzling.
And it still amazes me that the story is basically incoherent, and yet GE64, with the disadvantage of not even having cutscenes or the advents of the "cell phone" in-game menu as a means of providing information, did a better job at getting its plot across. Just such a shame.
#80
Posted 22 April 2009 - 02:17 AM
#81
Posted 22 April 2009 - 02:24 AM
#82
Posted 22 April 2009 - 03:20 PM
#83
Posted 22 April 2009 - 03:26 PM
#84
Posted 23 April 2009 - 01:46 PM
I just haven't got the heart to sell it away because of the tiny bits ; better chases and better flow of storyline.
#85
Posted 24 April 2009 - 02:50 PM
#86
Posted 01 May 2009 - 09:30 PM
I consider myself to be a terrible gamer.
But, I have a PS3 and would like to play QoS.
How hard is the easiest mode?
Please don't make fun of me.
Please let me know.
#87
Posted 01 May 2009 - 11:01 PM
Hi.
I consider myself to be a terrible gamer.
But, I have a PS3 and would like to play QoS.
How hard is the easiest mode?
Please don't make fun of me.
Please let me know.
I thought it was fairly easy, and I seriously suck at any video game that isn't an RPG (healing items and revivals are my saving grace lol). Yeah it was still challenging, so it wasn't a quick sit down and beat it in no time at all kind of thing, but I was never really shouting angrily at my TV (as I so often do) and I don't remember ever wanting to throw my controller through the TV.
#88
Posted 02 May 2009 - 01:07 AM
Hi.
I consider myself to be a terrible gamer.
But, I have a PS3 and would like to play QoS.
How hard is the easiest mode?
Please don't make fun of me.
Please let me know.
I thought it was fairly easy, and I seriously suck at any video game that isn't an RPG (healing items and revivals are my saving grace lol). Yeah it was still challenging, so it wasn't a quick sit down and beat it in no time at all kind of thing, but I was never really shouting angrily at my TV (as I so often do) and I don't remember ever wanting to throw my controller through the TV.
Thanks!
I'm probably going to try it.
#89
Posted 05 May 2009 - 04:23 PM
I love this game!!!!!
IT'S THE BEST BOND GAME EVER!
#90
Posted 08 May 2009 - 10:30 PM
Fun, the ps2 sure was not. I played through the chases few times, but I just couldn't bring myself to play through the whole game again. The quick time events and bad targeting just irked me to no end.
So I sold it. But for me the ps3 version hold up pretty well and is fun to pick up and play from time to time. Even though it's not perfect. At least it's fun.