What's the last Bond movie you watched?
#781
Posted 31 December 2009 - 05:44 PM
#782
Posted 31 December 2009 - 05:53 PM
#783
Posted 31 December 2009 - 07:38 PM
#784
Posted 04 January 2010 - 11:27 PM
#785
Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:58 AM
#786
Posted 05 January 2010 - 03:41 PM
Just the first hour. I really appreciate Dalton's performance and John Glen's pacing with the mostly excellent script.
#787
Posted 05 January 2010 - 04:41 PM
#788
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:32 AM
#789
Posted 07 January 2010 - 07:58 AM
#790
Posted 10 January 2010 - 07:36 AM
Octopussy & OHMSS last night.
Those 2 would make a great double feature.
Moonraker. I looked for and noticed many things in common with On Her Majesty’s Secret Service which I have also watched recently.
#791
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:16 PM
Edited by ChrissBond007, 11 January 2010 - 10:17 PM.
#792
Posted 12 January 2010 - 10:19 PM
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger
#793
Posted 13 January 2010 - 05:24 AM
#794
Posted 15 January 2010 - 02:42 PM
Watched Quantum of Solace last night. Craig shouldn't be bothered by the critics at all. His second film is a first-rate romp and definitely one of the best films in the franchise.
It's not terrible by any means. It's definately not the best though, either. I can enjoy it, it's certainly rewatchable. Just dire compared to it's predecessor. I agree with you though, Craig is the best thing about the movie.
#795
Posted 16 January 2010 - 01:26 AM
#796
Posted 17 January 2010 - 11:04 PM
Octopussy & OHMSS last night.
Those 2 would make a great double feature.
Moonraker. I looked for and noticed many things in common with On Her Majesty’s Secret Service which I have also watched recently.
Ah interesting. Would you care to list them for us? It would be an interesting read.
#797
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:07 AM
#798
Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:19 AM
Octopussy & OHMSS last night.
Those 2 would make a great double feature.
Moonraker. I looked for and noticed many things in common with On Her Majesty’s Secret Service which I have also watched recently.
Ah interesting. Would you care to list them for us? It would be an interesting read.
Not wishing to hijack, but the basic central plot is the same, right?
mad genius sends out carriers of destruction to cause death/wreak havoc?
They also contain Barry's two most romantic scores...
Edited by jrcjohnny99, 18 January 2010 - 05:20 AM.
#799
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:07 AM
hat's the proper way to see DAF and the entire 1971-1974 Bond period, i.e. a sequel to the events of YOLT, not OHMSS.
I would view that era as 1967-1974 Bond period, with OHMSS being the exception.
The last Bond movie I saw was THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS. And I loved every minute of it . . . even the Aston-Martin sequence, which I'm usually not that fond of. Watching the movie reminded me why I had seen it 7 to 8 times when it first came out in 1987.
#800
Posted 19 January 2010 - 04:06 PM
Everytime i watch it again i love it even more
#801
Posted 19 January 2010 - 05:51 PM
#802
Posted 19 January 2010 - 09:37 PM
I was going to wait but I ended up saying screw it and now after I get a flat screen TV I will decide to get them all again on Blu Ray or just certain ones.
Moonraker I love because it has everything in a Bond that should be there. A great hero and villian, beautiful women in which Bond gets to know better, and great locations with wonderful color photography. The story line is larger than life which is why the film stands up. Most of the special effects stand up as well which just goes to show how brilliant the film makers are over there in England.
As Roger has said, the money is up there on the screen.
This was covered on another thread but I have come to love Roger as much as Sean and maybe even more so now because I am so familiar with Seans Bond's. I know ever line and every move so this is a breath of fresh air especially since I no longer have any predjudice who plays Bond now. It always was Connery for me but now I just enjoy the film.
#803
Posted 19 January 2010 - 10:04 PM
I know ever line and every move so this is a breath of fresh air especially since I no longer have any predjudice who plays Bond now. It always was Connery for me but now I just enjoy the film
That is very interesting to read Hotwinds. I know a few people in their 50's and 60's who say that Connery is the only Bond, and Roger Moore will always be The Saint to them. My grandparents still say that Connery was the best 007.
However, I wonder how many in that age group have followed the series longer, and have now come to appreciate Roger's take on the role, and maybe even some of the more recent actors?
#804
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:18 PM
However, I wonder how many in that age group have followed the series longer, and have now come to appreciate Roger's take on the role, and maybe even some of the more recent actors?
#805
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:23 PM
#806
Posted 20 January 2010 - 11:50 PM
Sounds like a new thread.....
However, I wonder how many in that age group have followed the series longer, and have now come to appreciate Roger's take on the role, and maybe even some of the more recent actors?
I was thinking that, but I was unsure as to what to call it?
#807
Posted 21 January 2010 - 03:52 AM
More and more, the Brosnan films seem like a transition period in the series, building on that Dalton vibe and attempting some seriousness some of the time, but never fully embracing it or even getting the mix right IMO. Baby steps.
#808
Posted 21 January 2010 - 05:59 PM
#809
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:17 AM
More and more, the Brosnan films seem like a transition period in the series, building on that Dalton vibe and attempting some seriousness some of the time, but never fully embracing it or even getting the mix right IMO. Baby steps
I can understand the caution when it came to changing things too much, when they had such huge blockbusters on their hands. It's what makes Casino Royale such a brave step.
#810
Posted 23 January 2010 - 06:53 PM