
Bond 23: Risico
#121
Posted 18 November 2008 - 11:22 PM
"Hey, I'm gonna go see Property of a Lady!"
QoS wasn't a good Bond title, but atleast it didn't sound like a chick flick.
#122
Posted 19 November 2008 - 03:20 AM
I don't think so. You could just create a brand new character named Shatterhand, or perhaps name a device after it (ala the Moonraker shuttle, the GoldenEye satellite), or even have it be the title of some project or operation (ala Operation: Thunderball). EON can create their own significance for the name.How would it work as a movie title? Wouldn't they have to introduce Blofeld?
If it ended up being a new villain´s name, it would be the first time since Connery´s third: Goldfinger. Now it´s Craig´s third film so it would fit rather well, even in the publicity department

#123
Posted 19 November 2008 - 07:41 PM
I'd frankly be happy witih either risico Shatterhand or the hildebrand rarity.
#124
Posted 21 November 2008 - 11:28 PM
Yes, it does."Risico" was always only ever an adequate title for a brilliant short story. It does not belong on a film poster.
RisicO
....O
....7
#125
Posted 06 March 2009 - 08:18 PM
My Reasoning Bond has learned all the risks of being a spy (falling in love letting his emtions get in the way etc) He has also put himself up to a great deal of risks by exposing Quantum for the multi national orgnization they are nothing is safe thereforth with all these risks it makes sense that James bond return in
RISICO
#126
Posted 06 March 2009 - 10:09 PM
The name itself is sweet nothing. But it does sound Bondian enough to be next title in line.
#127
Posted 06 March 2009 - 10:31 PM
Wel, considering that EON didn't choose the title for QUANTUM OF SOLACE util two days before they announced it, I don't think you've got much to go on.I'm brining this thread back as actually i think bond 23 is Risico.
My Reasoning Bond has learned all the risks of being a spy (falling in love letting his emtions get in the way etc) He has also put himself up to a great deal of risks by exposing Quantum for the multi national orgnization they are nothing is safe thereforth with all these risks it makes sense that James bond return in
RISICO
#128
Posted 07 March 2009 - 12:46 AM
#129
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:27 AM
#130
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:40 AM
#131
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:45 AM
YOU ASKED FOR IT
#132
Posted 07 March 2009 - 03:50 AM
Well, it's almost always an out-of-left-field choice, so I'm going to go out on a limb here and say...
YOU ASKED FOR IT
YOU ASKED
_FOR IT
___7
It's settled then

Edited by Mr Teddy Bear, 07 March 2009 - 03:51 AM.
#133
Posted 07 March 2009 - 04:57 AM
James bond will Return in
007 in New York
I think my logic is sound
#134
Posted 07 March 2009 - 05:13 AM

#135
Posted 07 March 2009 - 06:13 AM
____007 in
New York
_______7
No it just doesn't work hence it will not be the next title.
#136
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:07 PM
#137
Posted 07 March 2009 - 04:42 PM
#138
Posted 07 March 2009 - 08:14 PM
Edited by Martini, 07 March 2009 - 08:16 PM.
#139
Posted 07 March 2009 - 11:19 PM
#140
Posted 08 March 2009 - 02:07 AM
"Risico" was always only ever an adequate title for a brilliant short story. It does not belong on a film poster.
Exactly. If it were such a good title as some would have you believe, Fleming'd have named the book after it. He didn't. Those who point out that after QOS being used, Risico's got a chance are missing the point that Quantum of Solace is indeed a good title.
Then there are those thick enough to believe 007 in New York would work as a title...
Edited by Donovan Mayne-Nicholls, 08 March 2009 - 02:11 AM.
#141
Posted 08 March 2009 - 03:48 AM