
Second 'Quantum of Solace' poster revealed
#181
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:38 AM
#182
Posted 14 July 2008 - 03:17 PM

#183
Posted 16 July 2008 - 01:56 AM
There's a watch?Saw the new quad at my local cinema yesterday. Gets the message accross nicely. You know it's a Bond film and that it's out on Oct 31st. I have to say, when you just see it 'in the flesh' you don't tend to view it as critically (I didn't even notice the watch).
I didn't even notice.
But then, that's my approach to roduct placment in the films. Making movies isn't cheap, and so the producers have to get money from somewhere to pay for it. If they have to use product placement, that's fine. I'll just ignore it. But if it's not there, the film doesn't get made - or is of poorer quality - because of a lack of money.
#184
Posted 16 July 2008 - 09:43 AM

#185
Posted 16 July 2008 - 10:09 AM
Some how I can believe that.I went to see 'Wanted' yesterday and saw a poster hanging up, I asked for one but some fool said I wasn't allowed. I then proceeded to blow the place up.
#187
Posted 17 July 2008 - 01:58 PM
Attached Files
#188
Posted 17 July 2008 - 04:07 PM
Some how I can believe that.I went to see 'Wanted' yesterday and saw a poster hanging up, I asked for one but some fool said I wasn't allowed. I then proceeded to blow the place up.
I know the feeling! You can take it from a video club as soon as it gets in DVD, but I don't think you can wait till then!
#189
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:42 AM
#190
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:09 PM

Attached Files
#191
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:34 PM
#192
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:41 PM
NOT!!!!!!!!
#193
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:48 PM


#194
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:50 PM

#195
Posted 21 July 2008 - 07:18 PM
Why do his hands look monstrously big?
Now we know why his little finger is so good...
#196
Posted 21 July 2008 - 07:20 PM
What a ghastly tick.
#197
Posted 21 July 2008 - 07:21 PM
#199
Posted 21 July 2008 - 08:36 PM
#200
Posted 21 July 2008 - 08:39 PM
xxx
#201
Posted 21 July 2008 - 08:48 PM
#202
Posted 21 July 2008 - 08:50 PM
#203
Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:05 PM
#204
Posted 21 July 2008 - 10:12 PM
Why do his hands look monstrously big?
Now we know why his little finger is so good...
Thanks. I do so agree.

#205
Posted 21 July 2008 - 11:56 PM
Indeed. What happened to the great marketing machine from CASINO ROYALE?Wow, the posters are really stunning for this Bond film.
NOT!!!!!!!!
#206
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:02 AM
I am no fan of the 2-line logo:
Quantum of
.......Solace
........7
But now, what little chance there was of people successfully "reading" the 007 logo from the O in 'of' and the O in 'Solace' has now vanished with the 3-line set-up of:
Quantum
..of
.Solace
..7
I know we've seen the 3-line set-up before, in the QoS blog among other places. But IO never thought we'd see this in an actual poster. I'm no graphic designer, or typesetter, but I know bad graphic design when I see it.
It looks ridiculous.
Edited by neversaynever, 22 July 2008 - 01:06 AM.
#207
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:29 AM

#208
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:35 AM
Yep - just done so.Was mentioned over at the other poster thread - maybe the threads could be merged...
#209
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:43 AM
well... Aren't we being a little unfair? I mean, for CR we had Craig in shadows with a gun at the poker table... And now we have Craig looking pretty dapper in the hot desert sun, with his big gun. Okay, i'm not blown away by this teaser poster but at the same time I think it's in keeping with previous efforts and does the job. There's no reason to think we won't get a more elaborate and exciting final theatrical poster sometime soonWow, the posters are really stunning for this Bond film.
NOT!!!!!!!!
#210
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:44 AM
No idea, they look drab compared to their CR counterparts. I can tolerate them, but they better get their act together. These lot are not in the same league at the moment.Indeed. What happened to the great marketing machine from CASINO ROYALE?Wow, the posters are really stunning for this Bond film.
NOT!!!!!!!!