
Official 'Quantum of Solace' Teaser Trailer Coming 2 July
#331
Posted 05 June 2008 - 11:34 AM
Shame on me for being interested in the trailer and enjoying a bit of speculation about when it might come out.
#332
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:32 PM
#333
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:33 PM
I know he does, some people may find this of interest
#334
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:36 PM
Though the main reason I consider most people here to be somewhat lacking is because I've been felt to made rather unwelcome from the moment I stepped in here - a few users (honeyjes being the main example) stalking me all over the forums looking for things to pounce on - simply because I disagree with them. The Amy Winehouse threads being the prime example. Sure, I can be opinionated, I'll be the first to admit it ... but that doesn't justify people doing the selfsame things they claim to be calling me down on. So you'll forgive me if I'm somewhat apathetic towards the standing majority of you; for a forum that claims to be the best on its subject on the itnernet, some of you do a hell of good job of making hypocrites and liars of the lot of you. The sheer fact that someone went looking for stuff that I've said elsewhere is proof enough. As some of you constantly remind me, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and that we all represent the forum ... now I'm wholly aware of what I am, but what does all that say about you?"Is the trailer here yet?"
"I wish the trailer was here"
"I really wish the trailer was here"
"Hopefully we'll be getting the trailer soon"
"When do you think we'll get the trailer?"
"The trailer might be out today, or it might not"
"I heard the trailer was going to be out with Hancock, on July 2"
"The trailer is on youtube, unless it isn't"
"Is the trailer here yet?"
"Has anyone seen the trailer?"
"Hi, does anyone know when the trailer will be out?"
"Trailer trailer trailer"
![]()
Edited by Captain Tightpants, 05 June 2008 - 12:39 PM.
#335
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:42 PM
Your call.
#336
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:55 PM
DidnThe sheer fact that someone went looking for stuff that I've said elsewhere is proof enough.
#337
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:08 PM
#338
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:20 PM
#339
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:24 PM
I am really not interested in who started it and winning it will be a particularly unimpressive achievement.
The teaser trailer is not yet out, and when it is out no doubt people will say it is rubbish anyway for a variety of anonymous reasons.
Just calm down. None of this has anything to do with us anyway; we're just parasites.
#340
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:30 PM
So my responding to some of your comments in a few threads qualifies me as a stalker, but it's perfectly OK for you to belittle other posters who you consider of little intellect. Sinking in your own petard me thinks.
#341
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:49 PM
Captaintightpants
So my responding to some of your comments in a few threads qualifies me as a stalker, but it's perfectly OK for you to belittle other posters who you consider of little intellect. Sinking in your own petard me thinks.
Please be careful.
Thank you.
#342
Posted 05 June 2008 - 02:18 PM
Edited by Captain Tightpants, 05 June 2008 - 02:22 PM.
#343
Posted 05 June 2008 - 02:36 PM
I'm not convinced that anyone is as interested in you as you assert, but if they are, then claim that gilded victory and move on to something less boring than drawing attention to yourself. Please.
#344
Posted 05 June 2008 - 02:40 PM
I'm not sure you're saying anything about James Bond here, or the teaser trailer. Please try to keep the discussion of interest to others.
I'm not convinced that anyone is as interested in you as you assert, but if they are, then claim that gilded victory and move on to something less boring than drawing attention to yourself. Please.
I love mods

#345
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:00 PM
#346
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:34 PM
Be careful of what, Jim? A modsmack? Doesn't much scare me. While some people would no doubt be in a celebratory mood - and they know perfectly well who they are - it won't do much good if that's what I'm aiming for. All those people that would rather see the back of me and have worked so hard at justifying themselves by saying "well you do it, so it's okay for me to do it to you" and then take the moral high road as if they can somehow make a person better by posting on the internet will have woked for nothing. And if I don't get banned, they still get nothing because I'll still be here. Even if I lose, I still win.
You would prefer that I denied it outright and invented some lame excuse as to what I wrote? Of course, if I'm a hypocrite and a liar, that destorys the credibility of everything I said. Not just here, but elsewhere.I love the way you completely ignored the next line of the post:And then when he is caught-out he has the effrontery to say…
For a forum that claims to be the best on its subject on the itnernet, some of you do a hell of good job of making hypocrites and liars of the lot of you.
for a forum that claims to be the best on its subject on the itnernet, some of you do a hell of good job of making hypocrites and liars of the lot of you. The sheer fact that someone went looking for stuff that I've said elsewhere is proof enough. As some of you constantly remind me, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and that we all represent the forum ... now I'm wholly aware of what I am
I see.
So are saying that you are "a liar and a hypocrite "? and then you start berating me for not paying attention to every word you write.
Interesting, most interesting.
And honeyjes, this is precisely what I'm talking about. I aware I'm flawed, and that one of the few good things I have about me is a sense of self-awareness. And then it's people such as your ownself who come along with the intentions of putting a whole negative light on it to justify your own actions. I'm no saint and I have no claims to being right - and nor did I ever make them - but in this case, I'm less-wrong.
Captain Tightpants, do us all a favour and please SHUT UP! I dont mean to be rude but you're becoming very irritating.

As for the Trailer. Why does everyone still think its coming with Hancock? Wasn't It delayed?
I expect to see it in the coming week.

#347
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:34 PM
So is the trailer out yet?
Um..........no.
#348
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:51 PM
What amuses me is the notion that if EoN don't give us the trailer 'RIGHT NOW', then the film will lose audiences. I think its fairly safe to say that even if they released no trailer at all, we'd all go and see the film, most probably more than once.
Edited by iexpectu2die, 05 June 2008 - 03:54 PM.
#349
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:54 PM
#350
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:55 PM
#351
Posted 05 June 2008 - 04:06 PM
I love JimI'm not sure you're saying anything about James Bond here, or the teaser trailer. Please try to keep the discussion of interest to others.
I'm not convinced that anyone is as interested in you as you assert, but if they are, then claim that gilded victory and move on to something less boring than drawing attention to yourself. Please.
I love mods

I'm convinced he is actually Stephen Fry.
#352
Posted 05 June 2008 - 06:47 PM
I love JimI'm not sure you're saying anything about James Bond here, or the teaser trailer. Please try to keep the discussion of interest to others.
I'm not convinced that anyone is as interested in you as you assert, but if they are, then claim that gilded victory and move on to something less boring than drawing attention to yourself. Please.
I love mods
I'm convinced he is actually Stephen Fry.
I'm getting vibes of Paxman and Laurie...
#353
Posted 05 June 2008 - 07:41 PM

#354
Posted 05 June 2008 - 07:56 PM
xxx
#355
Posted 05 June 2008 - 08:39 PM
#356
Posted 05 June 2008 - 08:47 PM
As for the Trailer. Why does everyone still think its coming with Hancock? Wasn't It delayed?
I expect to see it in the coming week.
Hancock will be released as scheduled - July 2nd in the states.
Edited by Ace Roberts, 05 June 2008 - 08:47 PM.
#357
Posted 05 June 2008 - 09:11 PM
A bit of trivia: Eisler wrote the intro to For Your Eyes Only.
#358
Posted 05 June 2008 - 09:11 PM
As for the Trailer. Why does everyone still think its coming with Hancock? Wasn't It delayed?
I expect to see it in the coming week.
Hancock will be released as scheduled - July 2nd in the states.
And in the UK... I just saw a TV Spot.
#359
Posted 05 June 2008 - 09:38 PM
Shame they couldn't persuade Daniel Craig to play Sid James, though.
#360
Posted 05 June 2008 - 10:02 PM
Shame that it's gotten universally mediocre advance reviews (not a positive reaction in the bunch).This Hancock film sounds interesting.