
Kevin McClory dies
#31
Posted 30 November 2006 - 03:56 AM
#32
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:00 AM
#33
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:13 AM
#34
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:26 AM
I think that any references to the impact his death will have on the future of the Bond franchise are inappropriate at this time. Rest in peace, Mr McClory.
It's an Internet forum specifically for Bond fans. There's nothing inappropriate about discussing the impact that his death may have. Died about a week ago too so when would be a good time to discuss it?
#35
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:26 AM
I just like to think of him, and Never Say Never Again as another, intergal part of Bond history. I think there's actually a book coming out on his whole deal next year I think.
Still, it's rather disgusting how people are treating his death.
My thoughts go out to his family and friends.
Now it will be interesting to see what exactly happens with all IPs he owned.
#36
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:30 AM
Okay fair play, I see your point. But I think that turning this particular thread into somewhere to discuss whether SPECTRE can now return isn't really appropriate. This should be left for people to pay their respects, should they choose to. This is of course merely my opinion, and I do expect people to differ on this.It's an Internet forum specifically for Bond fans. There's nothing inappropriate about discussing the impact that his death may have. Died about a week ago too so when would be a good time to discuss it?
I think that any references to the impact his death will have on the future of the Bond franchise are inappropriate at this time. Rest in peace, Mr McClory.
#37
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:30 AM
#38
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:37 AM
R.I.P., Mr. McClory.
#39
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:44 AM
RIP Kevin.
I agree that the whole Thunderball affair was pretty sad. Fleming should have credited him originally. Saltzman and Broccolli probably shouldn't have used SPECTRE in FRWL and DN. However if Kevin thought that EON ripped him off he should have mentioned it back the 1960s rather than the 1990s.
I thought he did "mention it back in the 1960s"...wasn't Thunderball made with the provision that McClory could remake it after a ten year non-compete clause expired? And sure enough, in the 1970s, talk of James Bond of the Secret Service produced by McClory and starring Connery started up...
And yes, the bottom line is, an innocent man's dead. Don't celebrate like this is Hitler or bin Laden passing, for god's sake.
#40
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:56 AM
I'll make a new thread for this. How about that? I know I'm ready to discuss it.Okay fair play, I see your point. But I think that turning this particular thread into somewhere to discuss whether SPECTRE can now return isn't really appropriate. This should be left for people to pay their respects, should they choose to. This is of course merely my opinion, and I do expect people to differ on this.
It's an Internet forum specifically for Bond fans. There's nothing inappropriate about discussing the impact that his death may have. Died about a week ago too so when would be a good time to discuss it?
I think that any references to the impact his death will have on the future of the Bond franchise are inappropriate at this time. Rest in peace, Mr McClory.
HERE IT IS
#41
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:17 AM
#42
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:20 AM
#43
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:24 AM

R.I.P. Kevin McClory
if it wasn't for him, Thunderball the book, the movie, and the (decidedly less impressive) Never Say Never Again would not be in our hands. At least, not in their current form. Those are, imo, huge positive contributions to Bond lore. Thanks Kevin.
(incidentally, I truly believe this deserves front page mention)
#44
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:26 AM
Where's Blofelds[sic] Cat when you need him?I found it facinating that he had a version of NSNA with Barry's Thunderball score replacing the original one which was much more to his liking.

Anyway I think there needs to be a film (TV or what have you) or documentary on The Battle for Bond. The problem is who would make it?
#45
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:28 AM
I think that any references to the impact his death will have on the future of the Bond franchise are inappropriate at this time. Rest in peace, Mr McClory.
It's an Internet forum specifically for Bond fans. There's nothing inappropriate about discussing the impact that his death may have. Died about a week ago too so when would be a good time to discuss it?
Well, since it was just announced, I'd give it another week or so before we start discussing the future of SPECTRE. Kind of like discussing how the deceased person's possessions are going to be divided up just a half an hour after the person died! Let's wait a little while before we start discussing his future impact on the franchise, preferrably on another thread later on.
Anyway, Kevin left a lot to the Bond franchise. Thunderball and Never Say Never Again are both very good films, and will always be favorites of many. My thoughts and prayers go out to his family and friends during this difficult time.
R.I.P. Kevin.
Edited by A Kristatos, 30 November 2006 - 05:30 AM.
#46
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:47 AM
Well, since it was just announced, I'd give it another week or so before we start discussing the future of SPECTRE. Kind of like discussing how the deceased person's possessions are going to be divided up just a half an hour after the person died! Let's wait a little while before we start discussing his future impact on the franchise, preferrably on another thread later on.
Well to be fair McClory has been dead over a week, we just didn't hear about it until now.
Did anyone notice that McClory turns out to be younger than what was said when he was alive?
#47
Posted 30 November 2006 - 06:01 AM
#48
Posted 30 November 2006 - 06:09 AM
#49
Posted 30 November 2006 - 06:12 AM
Yikes, let me clear up that mess. McClory liked NSNA better with Barry's score.
#50
Posted 30 November 2006 - 07:10 AM
He might not have been a favourite part of the Bond legacy, but he is still a part of it. Rest in peace.
#51
Posted 30 November 2006 - 07:40 AM
Condolences to those who were close to him.
#52
Posted 30 November 2006 - 07:46 AM
They say you shouldn't speak ill of the dead, so I won't. But I'm not a hypocrite, so I'm not going to suddenly start eulogising the man either. It is always a sadness when someone dies, but I can't pretend I'm going to mourn him. And if that sounds harsh, at least it's honest.
I merely observe that at least he enjoyed a considerable old age. Something that was denied Ian Fleming. I leave it to others to take what I mean from that.
Edited by dee-bee-five, 30 November 2006 - 07:46 AM.
#53
Posted 30 November 2006 - 08:02 AM
I always loved NSNA, a lot better than many of the EON films, yes it is indeed. Expertly handled by Kershner. In fact now that it's part of the company that EON's under, as a farewell of respect, they could put out McClory's intended version with the Thunderball score, maybe even the gunbarrel sequence!
Edited by Colossus, 30 November 2006 - 08:04 AM.
#54
Posted 30 November 2006 - 08:49 AM
Completely agree on all counts, deth.R.I.P. Kevin McClory
if it wasn't for him, Thunderball the book, the movie, and the (decidedly less impressive) Never Say Never Again would not be in our hands. At least, not in their current form. Those are, imo, huge positive contributions to Bond lore. Thanks Kevin.
(incidentally, I truly believe this deserves front page mention)
McClory's contribution to the Bond series, particularly in regards to the Bahamas and undersea stuff, cannot go unrecognized. How much credit he should get for the novel Thunderball, the Blofeld character, and SPECTRE can be argued, but what can't be argued is that he helped shape that novel which turned into the biggest Bond of all in the film series, and which he also co-produced.
McClory may not have been everyone's ideal Bond producer, but he nevertheless made a significant impact in the world of Bond. Because of him, we got to see what a legitimate remake of a Bond film would be like and he lured Sean Connery back for a seventh and final 007 film, for which we should all be grateful for.
R.I.P. Kevin and thanks for the memories.
#56
Posted 30 November 2006 - 09:30 AM
#57
Posted 30 November 2006 - 09:51 AM
[/quote]
"NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN" would not be in our hands" (?!!) Cinema and Bond is still trying to wash out the stains of that turgid TV movie off its palms like Lady Macbeth. Yes, he was a contributor to THUNDERBALL the book and film - and yes, his death is a sadness for those that knew him and I'm not trying to be deliberately crass.
Furthermore, it doesn't pave the way for SPECTRE fan-boys. The legalities with Eon and the Fleming estate have been long sorted. This "now he's dead, let's put SPECTRE in BOND 22" reeks of fan-boy bed-wetting and nothing resembling where the future of Bond resides. Eon could have used SPECTRE in CASINO ROYALE had they wanted to creatively. The situation is...they didn't. White cats, volcanoes and rockets are the hangovers of the glorious Ken Adam / 1960's era of Bond film making. But that was forty years ago.
My impressions of McClory - and solely those I picked up on in the press and literature - was that he was a "I used to be famous" whinger who couldn't get over the fact he's not on the Bond party bus (like a great many fans). To want to remake a remake of a film he only had a third involvement in is a tad tenuous and has very little to do with the longevity of the franchise. And to continually harp on about getting Connery back - and even Brosnan in the late 1980's - to remake NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN - smacks of creative disabilities and a complete disrespect for the Eon franchise.
R.I.P. definately. Not so sure about the "legacy".
#58
Posted 30 November 2006 - 09:54 AM
Furthermore, it doesn't pave the way for SPECTRE fan-boys. The legalities with Eon and the Fleming estate have been long sorted. This "now he's dead, let's put SPECTRE in BOND 22" reeks of fan-boy bed-wetting and nothing resembling where the future of Bond resides. Eon could have used SPECTRE in CASINO ROYALE had they wanted to creatively. The situation is...they didn't. White cats, volcanoes and rockets are the hangovers of the glorious Ken Adam / 1960's era of Bond film making. But that was forty years ago.
My impressions of McClory - and solely those I picked up on in the press and literature - was that he was a "I used to be famous" whinger who couldn't get over the fact he's not on the Bond party bus (like a great many fans). To want to remake a remake of a film he only had a third involvement in is a tad tenuous and has very little to do with the longevity of the franchise. And to continually harp on about getting Connery back - and even Brosnan in the late 1980's - to remake NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN - smacks of creative disabilities and a complete disrespect for the Eon franchise.
R.I.P. definately. Not so sure about the "legacy".
#59
Posted 30 November 2006 - 11:02 AM
At least in 1964-65 he had the good sense to go to EON with Thunderball and use all their in-house expertise including Connery to get the film made. He had the business sense to make a deal that was agreeable for both sides.
Which is far more admirable and creditable than Charles K. Feldman who was simply so unreasonable in his dealings with EON that we missed a classic 60s Casino Royale.
#60
Posted 30 November 2006 - 11:11 AM
Good point Schofield.Let's think fondly - at least for the moment - about McClory now that he's died, if we can.
At least in 1964-65 he had the good sense to go to EON with Thunderball and use all their in-house expertise including Connery to get the film made. He had the business sense to make a deal that was agreeable for both sides.
Which is far more admirable and creditable than Charles K. Feldman who was simply so unreasonable in his dealings with EON that we missed a classic 60s Casino Royale.