
The most obvious, jaw droppingly awful 007 goof
#31
Posted 18 March 2006 - 06:16 AM
#32
Posted 18 March 2006 - 06:20 AM
#33
Posted 18 March 2006 - 06:24 AM
#34
Posted 18 March 2006 - 03:22 PM
#35
Posted 18 March 2006 - 03:29 PM
#36
Posted 18 March 2006 - 05:48 PM

#37
Posted 18 March 2006 - 06:02 PM
#38
Posted 18 March 2006 - 06:17 PM
#39
Posted 18 March 2006 - 10:03 PM
#40
Posted 18 March 2006 - 10:11 PM
#41
Posted 18 March 2006 - 11:24 PM
As JB0074 says - it goes against what Bond films stand for - first class action & entertainment where every dollar is on the screen.
There were some issues with 2nd unit footage on Goldfinger of the Ft Knox aerial raid. So they went back and reshot. They didn't film with toy models or take the cheap way out.
Same director but entirely different ways of correcting mistakes on GF & DAF.
I can just see how happy Sean would be when they told him they would have to film a new scene in the interior of the Mustang to make up for the mistake.
"Bloody .... this better not interfere with my golf..."
#42
Posted 19 March 2006 - 12:13 AM
Also, the weak screams of agony from the "Chinese soldiers" in the same scene.
#43
Posted 19 March 2006 - 12:16 AM
#44
Posted 19 March 2006 - 01:11 AM
in Casino Royale - M promoting Bond to double-O despite working with him for 11 years. Don't get me started about Felix.
Hahahahahahaa!!!!!
#45
Posted 19 March 2006 - 04:26 AM
I vote for the DAF Mustang as well.
As JB0074 says - it goes against what Bond films stand for - first class action & entertainment where every dollar is on the screen.
There were some issues with 2nd unit footage on Goldfinger of the Ft Knox aerial raid. So they went back and reshot. They didn't film with toy models or take the cheap way out.
Same director but entirely different ways of correcting mistakes on GF & DAF.
Well, Connery's salary did take up half the budget. I imagine if they had the money to fix it they would. They just felt securing Connery one last time was more important.
#46
Posted 19 March 2006 - 05:06 AM
The "fire" and "explosions" in "China" when DAF's Blofeld strikes with the diamond-encrusted laser-weapon-from-space thingy. Did that cost even a hundred bucks to film?
Also, the weak screams of agony from the "Chinese soldiers" in the same scene.
A good choice, Bon-san, I'd completely forgotten about that one (although may that's the idea).
#47
Posted 19 March 2006 - 06:01 AM
Ugh. I agree. The "graphics" in DAF are cringeworthy (and I mean that literally, I do cringe when I see it). At least YOLT, which is almost as bad in the awful special effects department, can claim the excuse of coming four years earlier. Granted, that so-called lava at the end, the painfully obvious use of cheap blue-screen for the plane crash, and the original-War-of-the-Worlds look of Blofeld's spacecraft are still deplorable...
The "fire" and "explosions" in "China" when DAF's Blofeld strikes with the diamond-encrusted laser-weapon-from-space thingy. Did that cost even a hundred bucks to film?
Also, the weak screams of agony from the "Chinese soldiers" in the same scene.
A good choice, Bon-san, I'd completely forgotten about that one (although may that's the idea).
I've also gotta admit Krest's exploding head in LTK was laughable. It would have been a more powerful scene by simply cutting to a shot of Sanchez through the glass, and having it suddenly splattered with blood. As it stands, however, it's even more out of place in the film than Pam's crying or that winking fish.
#48
Posted 19 March 2006 - 06:41 AM
The "fire" and "explosions" in "China" when DAF's Blofeld strikes with the diamond-encrusted laser-weapon-from-space thingy. Did that cost even a hundred bucks to film?
Also, the weak screams of agony from the "Chinese soldiers" in the same scene.
I don't know if that counts as a goof. And I love that scene now because it's so awesomely-ridiculously-stupidily done. Heh.. Seriously everytime I see that movie with someone I make a note to point it out right before it happens so everyone can laugh. The Chinese guy on fire only adds to the hilarity.
#49
Posted 19 March 2006 - 08:31 AM
#50
Posted 19 March 2006 - 11:00 AM
#51
Posted 19 March 2006 - 11:06 AM
I say: let
#52
Posted 19 March 2006 - 11:33 AM
As the movies have stictly not any more relationship, colors and grain wise, with what was in the theaters back in the days, I say go with it full lenght. Don't reedit or anything, but fix badly made composites so that they still look as made in the sixties, but are not cheapo fake looking. They did this extremely well on a lot of movies... And you don't even know because they dont make the hype about it.
#53
Posted 19 March 2006 - 01:15 PM
If we follow your way of thinking, we would still watch the first superman with his costume color changing from shot to shot.
If they made the mistake the first time then it just is that way. Why is everybody so obsessed with perfection nowadays?

#54
Posted 19 March 2006 - 02:52 PM
#55
Posted 19 March 2006 - 11:32 PM
#56
Posted 20 March 2006 - 12:53 AM
#57
Posted 20 March 2006 - 03:58 PM
One thing that I always noticed is in TSWLM. They take over the Liparus and Bond is changing the coordinates so that they will destroy each other. When you look at the map on the globe the sub is already across the Atlantic Ocean. That would take days to do...
Yes, that always irked me too. In fact when I was watching The Spy Who Loved Me with my girlfriend this weekend she pointed that out.
#58
Posted 20 March 2006 - 04:22 PM
The World Is Not Enough contains perhaps the most jarring, jaw-droppingly inept goofs ever to be committed to celluloid -
In the mine, Renard is escaping and Bond fires his gun at him point blank. Check how long it takes for the bullet to hit the glass - it must be slowest moving bullet in the history of man. That appallingly p*ss poor moment makes the makers of The World Is Not Enough look like Keystone Cops in their downright ineptitude and inability to properly edit a simple scene.
Considering the oft-repeated claim that you haven't seen this film since 1999 and then only the once, that's a hell of a memory you've got there.
Although I accept that it may have irritated you that much...
#59
Posted 20 March 2006 - 05:08 PM
One thing that I always noticed is in TSWLM. They take over the Liparus and Bond is changing the coordinates so that they will destroy each other. When you look at the map on the globe the sub is already across the Atlantic Ocean. That would take days to do...
That and the trajectory of the missiles projected on the globe is just plain wrong. They should be flying straight at the opposite sub but instead they fly out, go miles out of their way and then come back to hit the subs.
#60
Posted 20 March 2006 - 05:08 PM