

FIRST PICTURES OF CRAIG AS BOND!
#211
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:47 AM

#212
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:58 AM
Taking another look, he does look like he's "buffed- up" a bit since October. Lean, but not over done. Tough looking bastard. What Bond should be.
Absolutely, he looks a lot beefier - like he could handle himself in a fight and pull some birds on the beach.
#213
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:59 AM
#214
Posted 03 February 2006 - 12:01 PM
As to the question as whether his outfit is his costume- it's worth noting that today it is -3
#215
Posted 03 February 2006 - 12:18 PM
http://commanderbond...s/arrival10.jpg
http://commanderbond...s/arrival15.jpg
http://commanderbond...conference2.jpg
is the same guy as this man
http://cache.gettyim...6E17F8095D70C73
#216
Posted 03 February 2006 - 12:25 PM
#217
Posted 03 February 2006 - 01:52 PM
It's not. The man in the t-shirt is Woody Allen's and Ursula Andress' love child, conceived while making Casino Royale in 1966. Note, that this young fella has Woody's masculine figure.
LOL

#218
Posted 03 February 2006 - 02:58 PM
#219
Posted 03 February 2006 - 03:38 PM
Eyes Only!
#220
Posted 03 February 2006 - 03:49 PM
Was that look very Bondian?
#221
Posted 03 February 2006 - 03:54 PM
#222
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:03 PM
Going back to the cloths and it not being very Bondian! Lets say that the internet was as big in '95 as it is now. Filming had just started on Goldeneye, and they started filming either the PTS, or the end sequence with Brosnan fighting Bean. Both scenes have Bond (especially PTS) in combat espionage type cloths and he looks battered. Would people complain that he isn't Bondian enough? His looks are exempt from this of course. Craig looks great as Bond. Some people on here complain so much it's as if we have Timo Perez as 007!
Eyes Only!
Quite; the internet may bring us many lovely things (free pronography and... um...) but sometimes it's an absolute hell, isn't it? Imagine what this would have been like if the first leaked photos of Goldfinger had shown Connery in that bathing suit or the first pictures of You Only Live Twice were of Connery's "look" in the latter stages of the film.
There'd be killings, probably.
#223
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:06 PM
guys, if there is ONE thing the EON series of films has almost always gotten right.... it's the Bondian clothes..... so don't worry.
#224
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:07 PM
Going back to the cloths and it not being very Bondian! Lets say that the internet was as big in '95 as it is now. Filming had just started on Goldeneye, and they started filming either the PTS, or the end sequence with Brosnan fighting Bean. Both scenes have Bond (especially PTS) in combat espionage type cloths and he looks battered. Would people complain that he isn't Bondian enough? His looks are exempt from this of course. Craig looks great as Bond. Some people on here complain so much it's as if we have Timo Perez as 007!
Eyes Only!
Quite; the internet may bring us many lovely things (free pronography and... um...) but sometimes it's an absolute hell, isn't it? Imagine what this would have been like if the first leaked photos of Goldfinger had shown Connery in that bathing suit or the first pictures of You Only Live Twice were of Connery's "look" in the latter stages of the film.
There'd be killings, probably.
Or Connery in that ripped, dirty and blood stained t-shirt from the end of Dr No
#225
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:09 PM
Boy, I can't wait until he puts a cape and cowl on and prowls the ni---wait...
#226
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:12 PM
OR perhaps Roger Moore looking like a clown in Octopussy!
Oh God, don't.
This place would implode.
#227
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:32 PM
OR perhaps Roger Moore looking like a clown in Octopussy!
Oh God, don't.
This place would implode.
Or Laz dressed up as Hillary Bray (both "station" outfit and kilt)
#228
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:45 PM
OR perhaps Roger Moore looking like a clown in Octopussy!
Oh God, don't.
This place would implode.
Or Laz dressed up as Hillary Bray (both "station" outfit and kilt)
He's wearing a skirt! He's wearing a skirt! And now he looks like Sherlock Holmes! OHMSS is going to be a disaster...
OK, bad sort of example, maybe.
Sorry.
#229
Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:51 PM
Hmmmmmmmmm..........I can't say 3 pictures mean we will have a great Bond film.![]()
It's to be expected 3 pictures would generate excitment here but will that translate to the straight world? Bill Murray would get it BUT will the straights?
Holy crap, was that a Ghostbusters 2 joke?
Flash1087--good man!


It's funny how so many can get so excited over 3 blah photos. I'm not impressed.
Looking at these pics, I can't say he looks tougher than Sean. Dirtier, yes.
Also hard to say for sure if he is more muscular than Sean in DR.NO, or George in OHMSS. You'd be surprised how a tight t-shirt can fool the eye. If he were in a t-shirt that was one size larger, most here would be describing him as wiry.
Someone wake me when something worth 7 pages of posts comes up.
Have to agree. These snapshots aren't anything to get excited over. I'll wait and see as they progress along. What is it? Just Day 2 of shooting? I'm sure something a lot cooler may come along...
Yes an UNDERSTANDABLE overreaction to 3 pictures--nice to get some photos BUT i'm hardly going to exclaim Craig "King Bond" yet.

#230
Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:21 PM
anyways, as far as him looking stronger.... did you see him in Layer Cake... he was quite 'chiseled' there..... no reason to excpect any less.... I never understood why people thought he looked skinny.... quite the opposite in fact...
Edited by deth, 03 February 2006 - 11:10 PM.
#231
Posted 03 February 2006 - 07:40 PM
#232
Posted 03 February 2006 - 08:00 PM
#233
Posted 03 February 2006 - 08:02 PM
..........My God...... And I thought that Roger Moore and George Lazenby were bad........ My mistake, sorry! We got the worse Bond-James Bond ever and still, you're trying to cheer yourself up! Well, do whatever you want, guys. Maybe after you see the movie, y'll understand what I understood after the first look at Craig... Worst Bond EVER. Period.
Please send me the advance footage of Casino Royale that you have seemed to have seen. I would love to see it.
#234
Posted 03 February 2006 - 09:05 PM
..........My God...... And I thought that Roger Moore and George Lazenby were bad........ My mistake, sorry! We got the worse Bond-James Bond ever and still, you're trying to cheer yourself up! Well, do whatever you want, guys. Maybe after you see the movie, y'll understand what I understood after the first look at Craig... Worst Bond EVER. Period.
Please send me the advance footage of Casino Royale that you have seemed to have seen. I would love to see it.
He's clairvoyant, didn't you get the memo

#235
Posted 03 February 2006 - 09:11 PM
..........My God...... And I thought that Roger Moore and George Lazenby were bad........ My mistake, sorry! We got the worse Bond-James Bond ever and still, you're trying to cheer yourself up! Well, do whatever you want, guys. Maybe after you see the movie, y'll understand what I understood after the first look at Craig... Worst Bond EVER. Period.
Beast, aren't you jumping to conclusions rather quickly??

#236
Posted 03 February 2006 - 09:43 PM
#237
Posted 03 February 2006 - 10:16 PM
anyways, as far as him looking stronger.... did you see him in Layer Cake... he was quite 'chiseled' there..... no reason to excpect any less.... I never understodd why people thought he looked skinny.... quite the opposite in fact...
Agreed. See also the first Tomb Raider film. DC is no pushover.
#238
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:16 PM
..........My God...... And I thought that Roger Moore and George Lazenby were bad........ My mistake, sorry! We got the worse Bond-James Bond ever and still, you're trying to cheer yourself up! Well, do whatever you want, guys. Maybe after you see the movie, y'll understand what I understood after the first look at Craig... Worst Bond EVER. Period.
Please send me the advance footage of Casino Royale that you have seemed to have seen. I would love to see it.
He's clairvoyant, didn't you get the memo
There's not much time for you to laugh... Use it well.
We'll see in november, who'll be laughing last.
#239
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:25 PM
I don't understand one thing, why some fans have to bash one actor for being cast as James Bond, even without see his portrayal?!
..........My God...... And I thought that Roger Moore and George Lazenby were bad........ My mistake, sorry! We got the worse Bond-James Bond ever and still, you're trying to cheer yourself up! Well, do whatever you want, guys. Maybe after you see the movie, y'll understand what I understood after the first look at Craig... Worst Bond EVER. Period.
Please send me the advance footage of Casino Royale that you have seemed to have seen. I would love to see it.
He's clairvoyant, didn't you get the memo
There's not much time for you to laugh... Use it well.
We'll see in november, who'll be laughing last.


I tell you one thing, no matter which actor they would choose, I would support the actor always, because in my ingenuity, I believe the Eon people only wants the best for the franchise, not the worst. Sure, we the fans had our favourite for the role, I for one wanted Adrian Paul for it, but I didn't got it that way, and because of that I'm not sad, on the other way I'm very excited for this movie. Even if they choose Hugh Jackman, Clive Owen or any other actor I would suportive.
Why can't all of us, be sailing the same wave, and support Mr Craig, and give him a chance, hey?!

It's a great time to be a Bond fan, have you tought of that? In November James Bond will be everywhere!
#240
Posted 03 February 2006 - 11:45 PM