What are everyone's thoughts on the arc of Harvey Dent/Two-Face?
Of all the reviews I've read, very few have had any major criticisms. However, one that has popped up more than once, is Dent's transformation into Two-Face. Some have argued it happens too quickly or the story should have been its own film, rather than a subplot.
Also, is Dent actually dead? It certainly seemed so, but as far as I can recall, it wasn't made explicitly clear.
It's tragic that Heath Ledger won't return as there is a clear implication that Batman and the Joker would have otherwise been inextricably linked, but I suppose there is room for Two-Face to return.
While still within spoiler tags, I thought I'd link to this excellent
interview with Christopher Nolan, in which he highlights the need for a film franchise to move forward with its characters and narrative. He cites the Bond movies as probably the only film series to successfully continue otherwise (
Casino Royale's cliffhanger notwithstanding).
But I love
The Dark Knight's conclusion; a real cliffhanger, evocative of
The Empire Strikes Back (arguably the greatest cinematic cliffhanger of all). By the end of each franchise's second instalment (or fifth or sixth, depending on how you count), these characters have been absolutely put through the physical and mental wringer. The stage is set for the ultimate third-act finale that so often eludes such stories. Yet if any director is capable of pulling it off, Nolan must be it. The real shame is that Ledger won't be a part of it.