
Johnny English (2003)
#61
Posted 14 April 2003 - 09:36 AM
Some of the dialogue written in the last two Bond films, sounds like it has come straight out of a second-rate soap opera
#62
Posted 14 April 2003 - 09:37 AM
I thought it was fairly dull, some very funny scenes, but thought that they could have made use of some of the situations they were in in the adverts, like the Turkish rug scene. Would have liked to see him go abroad more. The only trouble with the gags is you could see them coming from a mile off.
#63
Posted 14 April 2003 - 09:40 AM
#64
Posted 14 April 2003 - 11:34 AM
Originally posted by Xenobia
I think a head full of Bond trivia would make you a better writer because you have a sense of history for the man, and for the film legacy. I think that can only help the writers.
-- Xenobia
Would that not lead us into the same areas of concern that Raymond Benson demonstrated? I am referring to the focussing and relying on the past as opposed to concentrating on the future etc.
#65
Posted 14 April 2003 - 12:07 PM
#66
Posted 14 April 2003 - 01:34 PM
I agree shooting the rockets at the speed camera was great - plus great sequence driving the vanquish in London, good skills too (loads better than driving in DAD - no obstacles, just huge sheet of ice - boring)
All in all, quite funny with some excellent moments - definitely worth a rental.
#67
Posted 14 April 2003 - 02:01 PM
Originally posted by Tim007
I think I have to support [dark]. I really appreciate the jobs of Purvis & Wade on The World is not Enough, the best Brosnan Bond imho. I didn't like Feirstine at all, his scripts were too action loaded. As for Die Another Day, P&W couldn't reprise their good job they did on The World is not Enough. And for Bond 21 I'd really like to see our Zen to write it
P.S. - I still love Johnny English, especially the AM Chase![]()
What I find funny in your remark on Fierstein is that he did an uncredited rewrite on P&W's TWINE script. So, actually you are saying on the one hand that you don't like his scripts, but on the other that he wrote your favorite Brosnan Bond movie.
#68
Posted 14 April 2003 - 06:47 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
What I find funny in your remark on Fierstein is that he did an uncredited rewrite on P&W's TWINE script. So, actually you are saying on the one hand that you don't like his scripts, but on the other that he wrote your favorite Brosnan Bond movie.
And don't leave out Dana Stevens! I will forever be grateful to her for saving us from the jet pack chase over London that Purvis & Wade thought up for TWINE (the boat chase that replaced it was her idea). If those two hacks had been allowed to get away with that we'd have been straight back to the days of 'Bondolas' and double taking pigeons. :eek:
#69
Posted 14 April 2003 - 07:34 PM
Originally posted by flares
great sequence driving the vanquish in London
DB7 Vantage actually, old thing. Sorry- must learn to stop correcting people!
I bought the soundtrack- and its great! Much better than DAD whilst still sounding relatively contemporary. Nice song by Williams and Zimmer too.
#70
Posted 14 April 2003 - 10:14 PM
You must lissen to his Millinium,Angels and Feel.
Millinium look like You only live twice.
#71
Posted 14 April 2003 - 11:05 PM
For Bond 21, I'd like to see a Purvis & Wade script, albeit with re-writes
#72
Posted 14 April 2003 - 11:18 PM
Wonder what their script was like?
#73
Posted 15 April 2003 - 01:14 AM
Originally posted by Simon
Would that not lead us into the same areas of concern that Raymond Benson demonstrated? I am referring to the focussing and relying on the past as opposed to concentrating on the future etc.
A fair point Simon, and one I can not answer in total because I haven't read the Benson novels.
I can tell you that I would hope P&W would acknowledge the past the way it should be acknowledged...as a foundation for the future.
-- Xenobia
#74
Posted 15 April 2003 - 08:05 AM
Originally posted by marktmurphy
DB7 Vantage actually, old thing. Sorry- must learn to stop correcting people!
My mistake - of course it is. My apologies.
Flares
#75
Posted 15 April 2003 - 08:30 AM
Originally posted by [dark]
Wow! Hadn't heard the jetpack chase thing!! Is that really true!?
It's impossible for me to be 100% certain on that, but the site I read it on is usually reliable for this kind of info. Now I suspect this jet pack idea may sound exciting to you, but for me it conjures up images of second-rate CGI and dodgy back projection. Or, worst of all, some poor stuntman dressed as Brosnan being slung from wires beneath a helicopter.
If EON had gotten hold of one of those SoloTrek aircraft the scene might have worked, but chances are it would have been prohibitively expensive to shoot and I doubt they would have been given permission to fly those contraptions over central London.
#76
Posted 15 April 2003 - 11:05 AM
#77
Posted 15 April 2003 - 11:22 AM
Originally posted by marktmurphy
DB7 Vantage actually, old thing. Sorry- must learn to stop correcting people!
Whoops! Silly Mark! The chrome around the grill marks it out as a DB7 GT! Probably. Or maybe it is a Vantage. I'm not entirely sure anymore...
#78
Posted 15 April 2003 - 11:56 AM
How silly could it have been . Every one complains about the CGI in Die Another Day . They forget about the Jet pack stunt in "ThunderBall . Connery clearly is not flying the machine . Also remember the stunt with Dalton hanging from wires under the helicopter in "Lisence To Kill" .Originally posted by Roebuck
Now I suspect this jet pack idea may sound exciting to you, but for me it conjures up images of second-rate CGI and dodgy back projection. Or, worst of all, some poor stuntman dressed as Brosnan being slung from wires beneath a helicopter.
#79
Posted 15 April 2003 - 12:04 PM
#80
Posted 15 April 2003 - 12:32 PM
Originally posted by marktmurphy
Whoops! Silly Mark! The chrome around the grill marks it out as a DB7 GT! Probably. Or maybe it is a Vantage. I'm not entirely sure anymore...
Sorry to disagree Mark, but I think it was a Vantage with a pretty grill.
#81
Posted 15 April 2003 - 01:06 PM
Originally posted by Roebuck
Now I suspect this jet pack idea may sound exciting to you, but for me it conjures up images of second-rate CGI and dodgy back projection. Or, worst of all, some poor stuntman dressed as Brosnan being slung from wires beneath a helicopter.
Huh? It sounds awful! Nothing would beat that fantastic boat chase!
#82
Posted 15 April 2003 - 01:24 PM
#83
Posted 15 April 2003 - 03:29 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
How silly could it have been . Every one complains about the CGI in Die Another Day . They forget about the Jet pack stunt in "ThunderBall . Connery clearly is not flying the machine . Also remember the stunt with Dalton hanging from wires under the helicopter in "Lisence To Kill" .
Connery was not flying the jetpack, but the thing did actually work as shown in the movie. It was a member of the US military that flew the jetpack in the movie.
The unrealistic part of that sequence in "Thunderball" is them picking it up and sticking it in the boot of the car. According to the documentary "Inside Thunderball" the jetpack would be too hot after the flight to just casually pick up and throw in the boot of a car.
#84
Posted 15 April 2003 - 05:16 PM
Originally posted by [dark]
Huh? It sounds awful! Nothing would beat that fantastic boat chase!
Sorry [dark]. I owe you an apology. I misinterpreted the ''Wow!'' in your earlier post.

#85
Posted 15 April 2003 - 05:19 PM
Plus the size of the jet pack would prevent it from fitting into the Aston Martin's boot .Originally posted by DLibrasnow
Connery was not flying the jetpack, but the thing did actually work as shown in the movie. It was a member of the US military that flew the jetpack in the movie.
The unrealistic part of that sequence in "Thunderball" is them picking it up and sticking it in the boot of the car. According to the documentary "Inside Thunderball" the jetpack would be too hot after the flight to just casually pick up and throw in the boot of a car.
#86
Posted 28 April 2003 - 09:30 AM
Originally posted by Roebuck
Sorry [dark]. I owe you an apology. I misinterpreted the ''Wow!'' in your earlier post.![]()
No need to apologise. The "Wow!" was astonishment more than anything. It definitely wasn't an impressed "Wow!", anyway.
#87
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:11 PM
If the character is based on the Baraclays Bank TV ads from a few years ago, does the bank have some ownership to it?
Just curious.
#88
Posted 28 April 2003 - 05:00 PM
#89
Posted 18 May 2003 - 01:36 PM
#90
Posted 23 June 2003 - 02:43 PM